Being allowed to sell useless/unwanted 5* champions
Bolita
Member Posts: 7
I’m stuck with a useless champion and can’t rid of it, in order to max another. What can we do about it, Kabbam?!
1
Comments
Why do you "need" to? Just don't use him. There's a difference between Need and Want. But since it's not possible, you want to.
It's not going to hurt your game play at all by having him. And if you really like him, your 5* could be a lot better than your 4* after taking him to R3 or R4. Less block damage, stronger, etc. Also, just having him makes your PI better, which helps if you have an ally since you'll get better rewards at higher ally levels and the 5* gives you a better score in arena if you use them - at least to hit some of the lower milestones quickly.
How useful can it 5* or 6* Howard The Duck?! You tell me... those useless champs, Can and should be sold to max others. But just having them there, unused? Makes no sense to me. That’s KABAM “Oh Well” trap! You don’t spend all this money, to get a 5* Rocket Racoon or Howard The Duck. I think they should sell champs individually, as opposed to an already selected “chance”, based on how much you spend. Once you read these offers
“But this bundle for an INCREASED chance to get a 5* Quake”, and you find out there’s a 1.8% of you getting a useful champion, forget it. They did once with Dr. Strange, apparently not good for business.
What is DUPE?!
@Bolita then whats the point of releasing new champions?
every champ that comes out all people care if they are op
Why should any skill champion exist if blade is the best skill champion to use?
why have thor rag? blade is better
why have taskmaser blade is better
why have agent venom? blade is better
why have karnak? blade is better
why have kingpin? blade is better
why have crossbones? blade is better
why have black widow? blade is better
why have falcon? bade is better
why have black panther or bpcw? blade is better
why have winter soldier? blade is better
why have hawkeye? blade is better
why have Elektra? blade is better
why have gwenpool? blade is better?
OMG but say gwenpool is also good? but if u had a choice, u would rather pick blade cause hes better.
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh another skill champion massacre is coming? is he more op than blade?
if hes not as good as blade.....then blade is still better!
tell me another skill champ that has..
insane amount of damage
mystic destroyer with danger sense
expand danger sense to all villains with ghost rider
infinite "REGEN"
insane bleed damage + he gains power gain vs bleeding oppoenets
insane sp2 damage.
insane synergy with stark Spider-Man further increasing
insane high prestige
insane synergy with stark also making danger sense even better
can also shake off debuffs up to 95% faster based on power bar
Guess what? what if they release an even stronger champ in the future? blade is useless
Guess what? what if they release a champ weaker than blade in the future? blade is better
we should have only champ tier per class right? again people will complain why is there only alittle bit of champs, when this game came out it had 24 champions. All people cared about is kabam adding more marvel characters. Then when it came to resources people only wanted the best champs to use so they.... CAN BEAT content!
why use any of those skill champs besides blade to beat act v!
because if I didn't have blade and had all those other champions I would of struggled getting through act v!
Why make howard the duck any good or rocket any good? clearly there should only be starlord os stark Spider-Man, but only kabam knows if they make a stronger champ than them, then starlord and stark Spider-Man will be useless