Beholder_V wrote: » It was a bug that got fixed. The neurotoxin effect is a passive effect and not a debuff, and when it expires it stuns the opponent. However, it was mistakenly applying the stun as a passive effect as well instead of a debuff, so it was able to stun opponents even if they were stun immune. Getting upset about this is just plain ridiculous, AA is one of the most powerful champs in the game, and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the bypass of stun immune was a bug since it wasn't anywhere in his description. This is a really silly thing to whine about, and to say it was now a waste of an upgrade to rank him? GTFO
Fluffy wrote: » Except that's not why people are upset...the STUN was communicated as working as intended. Yes, people make mistakes. In my workplace, we quote sales to customers. If one of my people were to quote an incorrect price I would be required to honor it regardless if it was a mistake or not. I would fix it going forward, of course, but I would make it right for my customer. That's not what happened here. Yes, being able to stun a stun immune opponent is ridiculous. So to was how Kabam handled the change...and that is the issue. The cover up is always worse than the crime!
Beholder_V wrote: » I remember seeing threads where people pointed out that AA's neurotoxin stun could bypass immunity, but did Kabam ever actually say that this was working as intended? Or did folks just assume that silence on their part meant that it was working as intended? I agree that Kabam really needs to work on that whole transparency thing. Could save themselves a lot of heartburn.....
Shrimkins wrote: » Fluffy wrote: » Except that's not why people are upset...the STUN was communicated as working as intended. Yes, people make mistakes. In my workplace, we quote sales to customers. If one of my people were to quote an incorrect price I would be required to honor it regardless if it was a mistake or not. I would fix it going forward, of course, but I would make it right for my customer. That's not what happened here. Yes, being able to stun a stun immune opponent is ridiculous. So to was how Kabam handled the change...and that is the issue. The cover up is always worse than the crime! Stop being so over dramatic. Everyone knew it was broken regardless of what some random kabam mod said. Your analogy is total ****. This situation is more like one of your salesmen was having dinner with a customer and promising to meet some targeted price while half drunk. Of course that isn't good but it's also not official communication either. Just because someone said something doesn't make it gospel.
Appleisgod wrote: » I want a 5* AA rank down ticket for my r4 AA because of this
Beholder_V wrote: » Appleisgod wrote: » I want a 5* AA rank down ticket for my r4 AA because of this Seriously? ROFL Are you trying to say that AA's ability to bypass stun immune was the only thing that made him good? He's easily one of the most powerful characters in the game right now, and not because of his ability to bypass stun immunity.
Sirnoob2 wrote: » they have said themself that it was working as intendedhttps://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/41952/arch-angel-against-stun-immune-champs
DaMunk wrote: » It was a Nerf. No matter how you spin it, it was a Nerf. The only reason AA was looked at and changed is because people were using him in LoL and bypassing the maps limber. That's why a lot of people ranked him up and that's why their upset. I don't even have him as a 5 and think it's a little sketchy. Kabam was probably perfectly fine with his ability until they noticed how people were using him to clear certain things like LoL and last months Thanos. I honestly don't mind if they make changes to a champ if it's needed but they need to do it right and treat their customers right. I think rdts are warranted, I don't need one but still think it's a big enough change to require them.
Bader_Bajwa wrote: » What happened to archangel in this new update. Archangel is my strongest champ.