kabam you said something about fair matchups in aw right?

AndrewAndrew Posts: 238
edited July 2017 in General Discussion
yeah you said something about it few days ago. i remember guys, someone was angry about unfair wars, and you said "its not about alliance size, its about war rating guys <3 "
so there you have it boys and gals, 100% fair war VS 13.7ml and 2836 war rating alliance,
we are 7.3ml with 1366 war rating.
it will be gooood. bless you guys <304xfjfkndyrw.png
parpmxnxoxkw.png

Comments

  • Kabam will always do this. You can win 3-4 in a row then they mismatch you so bad that you have to just sit back and laugh.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 238
    Kabam will always do this. You can win 3-4 in a row then they mismatch you so bad that you have to just sit back and laugh.

    yeah we won few, and we were happy.
    so kabam gave us one more great and fair matchup before 4july.
    thank you guys, thank you <3 luv yaaa
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 21,541 ★★★★★
    That is rare. It's most likely the result of no one else closer Matchmaking at that time.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 21,541 ★★★★★
    Andrew wrote: »
    That is rare. It's most likely the result of no one else closer Matchmaking at that time.
    Matchmaking was 24hours ago not now.
    do you wanaa see some joke? there you go lol
    bxdc4aa1ib17.png

    Whenever the Matchmaking was, the computer draws on other Allies that are Matching at the time. I'm sorry it's so far off. Like I said, it's rare.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 238
    let it be here <3bahg5mfquz9b.jpg
  • ADDZZADDZZ Posts: 71
    We're a 3.5m alliance and have had 3 straight wars against 9m and 10m opponents. Complete BS.
  • wray1976wray1976 Posts: 459 ★★
    Andrew wrote: »
    let it be here <3bahg5mfquz9b.jpg

    Its a 1500 difference. No way should this match up happen.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 238
    wray1976 wrote: »
    Andrew wrote: »
    let it be here <3bahg5mfquz9b.jpg

    Its a 1500 difference. No way should this match up happen.

    yeah, my allance thinks the same too.
    can someone tag the administration?
  • Scud70Scud70 Posts: 77
    Lol of course this happens... Best way to make sure you use revives and units... Only way to combat it is just give up the loss and move on... Don't use items... They won't fix problems that they actually admit to let alone this which they say is part of the game...
  • DLegendDLegend Posts: 746 ★★★
    bahg5mfquz9b.jpg[/quote]
    AW should be based on alliance prestige and number of members. Not war rating.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Posts: 3,114 ★★★★
    The system widens its parameters for match making once an alliance's search exceeds a certain period of time. It's common in many ladder systems. Sucks to be in the losing end of it but it also sucks to go without a war because no other alliances near your war rating are searching along with yours. It should be a rare event to be on the losing end of this but if for some reason it isn't rare or you don't want the possibility search at an earlier time so you won't align your search times with those alliances.
    DLegend wrote: »
    AW should be based on alliance prestige and number of members. Not war rating.
    The prestige idea is idiotic, Prestige does not measure your talent or effectiveness to create a viable match. What does? War rating.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 238
    [/quote]
    The prestige idea is idiotic, Prestige does not measure your talent or effectiveness to create a viable match. What does? War rating.
    [/quote]

    agee, but this war rating algorithm is aslo broken..
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Posts: 3,114 ★★★★
    Andrew wrote: »
    agee, but this war rating algorithm is aslo broken..
    How is it broken? You found one of the exceptions that represents a fraction of a percent of all war matches in the rating system.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 238
    edited July 2017
    CoatHang3r wrote: »
    Andrew wrote: »
    agee, but this war rating algorithm is aslo broken..
    How is it broken? You found one of the exceptions that represents a fraction of a percent of all war matches in the rating system.

    yeah, and so some part is broken in the system.r7e4sxav6ai9.png
  • Robotron23Robotron23 Posts: 1
    Why is it that certain characters work differently in AW than in other games. Daredevil evaded most projectiles in quest and in Arena, but "all of a sudden" you put him in AW and he can't evade Hood, Yellow Jacket, Punisher, etc
  • MannysmokerMannysmoker Posts: 314
    War match up shouldn't be based on rating, but rather on prestige...
  • GrinderGrinder Posts: 242
    edited July 2017
    Wars are matched by war rating, if you get a really bad matchup it's because no one closer was currently trying to find a war when you were. Having said that, it does have the brick wall feature that many games have with stuff like this, similar to how arenas are. When you start to get on a win streak it'll eventually throw you against a higher team to bring you back down. You get into those higher ratings by pushing through those streaks. It sucks when it happens but it's just the name of the game. Things like AW aren't meant to allow you to have a continuous permanent win streak without repercussions.
Sign In or Register to comment.