Is two new champions per month too many?

I feel like with all of the other things breaking, maybe the dev team ought to focus on putting out just one new champ out per month and maybe focus more on fixing some of the lingering problems in the game and make sure updates are actually ready.

Also I feel like this schedule of 2 per month is sky-rocketing the number of champs and there are so many options now, it is hard to have enough time get to know any of them enough to know what champ I want to go for and rank up. I feel like the speed of the game is just all about more, more, more and it feels sometimes like things might be getting out of hand. It makes me wonder if introducing one new champ per month might be a potential solution to this problem. What do you think?

Comments

Heddarta

I agree. Quality should be the main focus of any release, whether champ, update, quest, etc.

I’m upset with the quick flooding of new content because each new ‘thing’ introduced causes emergency maintenance, bugs, or worse, as we’ve seen with the latest update.

I would monetarily support the game if i felt like it was a quality investment, but I do not at the moment because I feel my support will just feed the development of Champions and content that will place an even bigger gap between the players striving for steady progression (myself) and end-game high spenders.

Tiemilios

Completely and whole-heartedly agree. Kabam should be focusing on better testing their releases, the quality of their updates, fixing bugs identified by the community, identifying more bugs on their own rather than leaving it all to the community to find them, improving older champs, and paying attention to the community and needs/wants/desires of the community.

I have no problem spending on my hobby and investing in the development, but as a result of what I've seen, like @Heddarta I am no longer spending on this game with the way it is being managed. I am dissatisfied with how much Kabam has tried to do too quickly without appropriate testing and often seemingly prioritizing monetary gain. I perhaps will when I am more satisfied again with the development quality and customer service, and hopefully it will improve.

Usmcclt0316

Personally...after the 12.0 update, Kabam told the gaming community that god-tier champs ruin the game. What happened? Magneto, DS, Thor....and other champs got the nerf. SW, Thor, Wolverine, DS and some others STILL dont have a 5* or 6* version planned. Now...we have game content-deciding champs such as Blade "hurt you when you do anything" champs like Domino as well as other champs that are designed around auto-blocking/evading/parrying/stunning you. Yeah...remember when blocking, evading, parrying actually required skill?!?

I think we can do with fewer new champs if it means Kabam takes more time and resources to actually improve game mechanics and the quality of the game. Also, I would be ok with older...possibly obsolete champs getting a refresh each month to make more relevant (ie. Luke Cage, Red Hulk, etc.).

Also...now that we have Swiss army like champs with ability sets that require a novel-size manual to go along with their abilities and have 5* and 6* versions....its time for SW, Thor, and Wolvy to get their 5* and 6* versions.

Usmcclt0316

Also, like @Tiemilios I am also no longer spending on this game as it is clear that the newer champs released have thrown the balance of rosters way off. Basically, the state of the game has entered into a dark area of if you're not willing to spend to get the latest champs at 2 new per month...then that puts you at a serious disadvantage to those that have deep pockets.