Auce wrote: » That's what I figured, but I thought they based his character from Civil War.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Only OG.
Mainer123 wrote: » Wold at 2 of current time. He’s still the same guy. Right
AxeCopFire wrote: » Auce wrote: » That's what I figured, but I thought they based his character from Civil War. You know that World War II happened a few years before 2016 right?
Austin555555 wrote: » He wasn’t apart of the avengers during WW2. Wooulldnt make sense to have him as an avenger if he is from 1962(I think, I can’t remember right)
Maat1985 wrote: » cap america was the first avenger.... however... at the the time of WWii there was no other avengers.... it was the birth of Cap... who then later started the Avengers... so yes Cap America is a founder of the Avengers... however as WWii variation Avengers did not exist...
Akarsh383 wrote: » Maat1985 wrote: » cap america was the first avenger.... however... at the the time of WWii there was no other avengers.... it was the birth of Cap... who then later started the Avengers... so yes Cap America is a founder of the Avengers... however as WWii variation Avengers did not exist... Nick fury is the founder of avengers. Cap is just a member of avengers team
Maat1985 wrote: » Akarsh383 wrote: » Maat1985 wrote: » cap america was the first avenger.... however... at the the time of WWii there was no other avengers.... it was the birth of Cap... who then later started the Avengers... so yes Cap America is a founder of the Avengers... however as WWii variation Avengers did not exist... Nick fury is the founder of avengers. Cap is just a member of avengers team i said "a founder" as in a founding member.... he was an original avenger..... yes nick fury created the avengers.... but he was never an avenger himself.....
Maat1985 wrote: » tbh i really think the first avenger thing comes not from the fact that he was the first member of the avengers but the fact that he is the oldest superhero that becomes and avenger.....
My_Superior wrote: » spaceoctopus wrote: » No, he was only the first avenger lol That title was a cheap marketing ploy to hype up the first Captain America movie.
spaceoctopus wrote: » No, he was only the first avenger lol
Maat1985 wrote: » Austin555555 wrote: » He wasn’t apart of the avengers during WW2. Wooulldnt make sense to have him as an avenger if he is from 1962(I think, I can’t remember right) are you serious...... are you seriously telling us you dont know when WWII was????? you must be joking.....