How!?

Primis00Primis00 Member Posts: 281 ★★★
in General Discussion
how did we lose this war? we had every other score higher and the only difference was the bgs cleared??? how should this result in us losing when we clearly beat them in everything else?!?!

Comments

  • StatStat Member Posts: 113 Content Creator
    Score was 133k to 125k and you left 20k points on the table by not killing boss.
  • NeotwismNeotwism Member Posts: 1,803 ★★★★★
    U get more points for clearing a battle group. U guys barely scored higher in the other categories. The clear gave them just enough points to win.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Darkstar4387Darkstar4387 Member Posts: 2,145 ★★★
    edited September 2018
    Happyadam00 wrote: »
    how did we lose this war? we had every other score higher and the only difference was the bgs cleared??? how should this result in us losing when we clearly beat them in everything else?!?!

    Simple you didn't clear one group and left 20k left on the table if you beat that boss you would have won and got the victory bonus to but you didn't so you lost and so gave your opposition extra points which could hurt you in the long run.

    Boss kills are the most important things usually if you clear more and take down the bosses and the maps without dying that much you will win if not in close wars the side with the most boss kills will win it's as simple as that.

    We've lost wars like that and some a hell of a lost closer than that and we know why we lost and don't make pointless threads about it.
  • AxeCopFireAxeCopFire Member Posts: 1,115 ★★★
    Happyadam00 wrote: »
    sounds like bs. why should 1 bg not clearing decide the entire war. makes the other categories worthless in cases like this

    So, like... is this your first war? Because it seems like this might be your first war. If it is, then congrats on your first war! Today you learned that each boss kill is worth 20,000 points! Good job!
  • cx23433cx23433 Member Posts: 465 ★★
    ha
  • Colinwhitworth69Colinwhitworth69 Member Posts: 7,470 ★★★★★
    chrissbjordann wrote: »
    They do that because kabam anticipates that all bosses will be taken out. Those catergories are basically just tie breakers. To win wars you need to take out bosses plain and simple.

    Question: what happens to your score if the other team has no boss on that node?
  • WerewrymWerewrym Member Posts: 2,830 ★★★★★
    Colinwhitworth69 wrote: »
    chrissbjordann wrote: »
    They do that because kabam anticipates that all bosses will be taken out. Those catergories are basically just tie breakers. To win wars you need to take out bosses plain and simple.

    Question: what happens to your score if the other team has no boss on that node?

    You still get the points once the boss node is explored by someone.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • SpiderCoolsSpiderCools Member Posts: 615 ★★★
    Pennmabob wrote: »
    Just leave the guy alone, he's right in a way, his alliance won in all other categories therefore meaning that they are better in most ways so they should win. One node shouldn't mean the loss of a team. Stop being bullies.












    Lol joking this guy is hilarious. Boss kills are the most important things lmao. This guy should do some more wars to figure out how it works.

    Best comment here XD
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • TwmRTwmR Member Posts: 662 ★★★
    Pennmabob wrote: »
    SpiderCools wrote: »
    Pennmabob wrote: »
    Just leave the guy alone, he's right in a way, his alliance won in all other categories therefore meaning that they are better in most ways so they should win. One node shouldn't mean the loss of a team. Stop being bullies.












    Lol joking this guy is hilarious. Boss kills are the most important things lmao. This guy should do some more wars to figure out how it works.

    Best comment here XD

    Nah, the best comment came from the guy who created this discussion XD

    No the best comment came from John Madden
Sign In or Register to comment.