MattMan wrote: » Last AQ was last AQ and this AQ is different. They appreciate your feedback on this, however they don’t have plans at this current time to bring back AQ Completion event. They have different plans.
TacoScotty wrote: » MattMan wrote: » Last AQ was last AQ and this AQ is different. They appreciate your feedback on this, however they don’t have plans at this current time to bring back AQ Completion event. They have different plans. Well spoken. We should stop taking things like these for granted and see it as a blessing if it returns each week
Lovejoy72 wrote: » TacoScotty wrote: » MattMan wrote: » Last AQ was last AQ and this AQ is different. They appreciate your feedback on this, however they don’t have plans at this current time to bring back AQ Completion event. They have different plans. Well spoken. We should stop taking things like these for granted and see it as a blessing if it returns each week Wait, which one of you is taking the piss out of what? My irony detector is broken...
dkatryl wrote: » MattMan wrote: » Last AQ was last AQ and this AQ is different. They appreciate your feedback on this, however they don’t have plans at this current time to bring back AQ Completion event. They have different plans. Now the question is: Was a precedent set last AQ? Furthermore, will we need to debate the literal definition of 'precedent'? On topic, I was actually coming to the forums for this exact reason. Seems im not alone.