Witness the Great Revival! Act 6 Chapter 1 - Coming March 13th

1373840424378

Comments

  • MaatManMaatMan Member Posts: 958 ★★★
    i also said many times its not a money grab but i aint gunna keep replying everytime someone says it.
    people will not change their opinion.
    simple

    peace out
  • GamerGamer Member Posts: 11,708 ★★★★★
    Why not keep this for kabam and ingor @GroundedWisdom That esay to do hav a great day all
  • SnizzbarSnizzbar Member Posts: 2,289 ★★★★★
    edited March 2019
    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.
  • CFreeCFree Member Posts: 491 ★★
    Snizzbar said:

    I still think it's a stupid idea that's been poorly communicated, but purely on a personal level I think I'd be ok with it if either a. the 4* restriction was moved to Act 6.2; or b. we are given a STACK of 4* Rank 5 to 4 RDTs. Would obviously prefer neither option to be necessary though.

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Member Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    The gate should just be act 5 100%
    CFree said:

    Option b doesn’t make sense. If there giving them out, I’ll take 5* RDT, but a RDT for this issue makes zero sense because you didn’t upgrade your 4* for Act 6.
    How do you know they didn’t upgrade his 4* for act 6
  • This content has been removed.
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Member Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    CFree said:

    Because Act 6 was just announced.
    Ye and same with the 4* restriction meaning they could have ranked up that champ to fill a niche utility that they thought would be needed in act 6
  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    So only people who agree with you get to speak?
    MaatMan said:

    no but you can let them say it without replying to it all.
    you dsont have to have the last input.
    you can let someone say thier piece without saying anything against it.

    like i will be doing now.
    i will now stop replying to you. i have said my piece and that is all there is.
  • MaatManMaatMan Member Posts: 958 ★★★
    Lormif said:

    So only people who agree with you get to speak?

    exact opposite of wat i have said bro.
    everyone can have thier opinion.
    simple wat i said.
  • edited March 2019
    This content has been removed.
  • CFreeCFree Member Posts: 491 ★★
    Kobster84 said:

    Ye and same with the 4* restriction meaning they could have ranked up that champ to fill a niche utility that they thought would be needed in act 6
    Ya. Makes perfect sense. He actually downloaded the app based on using 4* so he should get reimbursed his data usage.
  • CFreeCFree Member Posts: 491 ★★
    AndiYTDE said:

    Actually I have upgraded a 4* champion for Act 6: My 4* Thing, I even put in an awakening gem. And back then I thought it was a smart decision for several reasons:
    I will not get a 5* Thing for at least 6 months, not even speaking of awakening him.
    In Act 5 Chapter 4, there were some bosses that were a lot easier with champions released a couple of months before Act 5.4, like Mephisto (Blade) and Ultron (Medusa). So I figured they´d follow the same pattern and make a boss my 4* Thing would help me a lot with.
    He´s an amazing champion who can save your butt if you mess up once, and his fury stacks generate an outstanding attack rating the longer the fight goes.

    This is not why I hate the champion restrictions, there are many other reasons for that. I also do not demand RDT as well, but I just wanted to let you know that there are some people who have upgraded their 4* champions specifically for Act 6, myself included.
    Right. So you ranked him for reasons other than Act 6.
  • Kobster84Kobster84 Member Posts: 2,898 ★★★★★
    CFree said:

    Ya. Makes perfect sense. He actually downloaded the app based on using 4* so he should get reimbursed his data usage.
    It’s like your purposely avoiding the point if the restriction hadn’t been announced 1 week before the release people may have used resources on mediocre 5* instead
  • CFreeCFree Member Posts: 491 ★★
    Kobster84 said:

    It’s like your purposely avoiding the point if the restriction hadn’t been announced 1 week before the release people may have used resources on mediocre 5* instead
    And you just made my point that it was announced prior to the release so what you did last month or last year is irrelevant. You want to use 4*, fine. But don’t pretend you ranked them because of Act 6.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Dead1Dead1 Member Posts: 225
    Oh kabam, my exam in 13th march
  • TheSquish671TheSquish671 Member Posts: 2,880 ★★★★★
    CFree said:

    Everyone just ignore this ☝️guy. You’re wasting your time
    Everyone just ignore this 👇guy. You’re wasting your time.
  • This content has been removed.
  • TheSquish671TheSquish671 Member Posts: 2,880 ★★★★★
    edited March 2019
    Well my comment is waiting to be approved. Gonna be so weird when it pops up randomly and won't make sense at all
  • CFreeCFree Member Posts: 491 ★★
    AndiYTDE said:

    You still did not reply to my comment. Why is that? Did you realize your post that nobody ranked up 4* champions for Act 6 is prooven wrong?
    No. But if someone did that, it doesn’t make a lot of sense (i.e., it was stupid).
  • This content has been removed.
  • Doomsfist79Doomsfist79 Member Posts: 922 ★★★
    AndiYTDE said:

    Well... were are the videos that shall help us prepare for Act 6? Only 3 days to go, I have not found a single video
    LOL.. maybe the content creators are finding it a bit difficult with out some synergies.. synergies that they had with 4*s.. OMFG.. how funny would that be??
Sign In or Register to comment.