I'm not sitting on a stellar Roster, but it's not horrible. I even used a Skill Gem on HE and took him to R4 because my pulls are hit-or-miss. The point I'm making is in order for Act 6 to exist, it has to be harder than Act 5. 4*s carried people through Act 5. They can't be expected to do the same for Act 6. Which means we either have to make do with what we have, or wait for something else to come along. Not the end of the world. It'll still be there. No one says people have to rush out and buy every Crystal that comes. You could, if you didn't have patience. However, I find it extremely hard to believe that out of an average of let's say, 30 or 40 5*s in someone's Roster, there's not something they can use to get started on it. Again, if people are waiting around for Corvus, Ghost, or Aegon, they could be using what they have in the meantime.
I used 4* in variant aswell so dont u start with your “act 6 is harder” And second if this 4* ban does not affect you why are you trying to ruin other peoples fun in game who game is affected?
I'm not trying to ruin anything. It's not my decision. It was theirs, and they made it. It also affects me because I'm a Player. The same roadblock applies to me too. I'm trying to explain the situation. If you can take a 4* into Variant, then you should have no problems taking your 5*s into Act 6.
I managed to take 4* to variant because they are still strong champions and they are much stronger than my 5* roster just as i said before, i dont know why i have to keep on repeating myself.
There's literally a few Champs that aren't available as 5*s. If you have the skill to make it through Variant with 4* strong Champs, then you have the skill to make it through Act 6 with mediocre Champs. 100%. That's the point I was trying to make. People get so hung up on having the same Champs they don't see their own skill and ability to use others.
I'm not sitting on a stellar Roster, but it's not horrible. I even used a Skill Gem on HE and took him to R4 because my pulls are hit-or-miss. The point I'm making is in order for Act 6 to exist, it has to be harder than Act 5. 4*s carried people through Act 5. They can't be expected to do the same for Act 6. Which means we either have to make do with what we have, or wait for something else to come along. Not the end of the world. It'll still be there. No one says people have to rush out and buy every Crystal that comes. You could, if you didn't have patience. However, I find it extremely hard to believe that out of an average of let's say, 30 or 40 5*s in someone's Roster, there's not something they can use to get started on it. Again, if people are waiting around for Corvus, Ghost, or Aegon, they could be using what they have in the meantime.
I used 4* in variant aswell so dont u start with your “act 6 is harder” And second if this 4* ban does not affect you why are you trying to ruin other peoples fun in game who game is affected?
I'm not trying to ruin anything. It's not my decision. It was theirs, and they made it. It also affects me because I'm a Player. The same roadblock applies to me too. I'm trying to explain the situation. If you can take a 4* into Variant, then you should have no problems taking your 5*s into Act 6.
I managed to take 4* to variant because they are still strong champions and they are much stronger than my 5* roster just as i said before, i dont know why i have to keep on repeating myself.
There's literally a few Champs that aren't available as 5*s. If you have the skill to make it through Variant with 4* strong Champs, then you have the skill to make it through Act 6 with mediocre Champs. 100%. That's the point I was trying to make. People get so hung up on having the same Champs they don't see their own skill and ability to use others.
That doesn’t make any sense. 4* AA is still AA and doesn’t what AA does. Using a mediocre champ in place of a AA when AA is needed doesn’t make any sense.
It makes perfect sense when you don't have the 5* version.
As much as I think Grounded Wisdom brings some of this on him (or her) self, it’s time to stop the personal attacks. If you dislike the points made, that’s fine—but republication of Seatin’s comments and reveling in them is wrong.
Please get back to the point of this thread—bad decision making by the game team. Bullying and ad hominems don’t need to be part of it.
Dr. Zola
What is the point of getting back to the point, if Kabam doesn’t give a f*** about what they’re player base thinks?
The point of the thread is important, and Kabam has changed course on more than one thing in the past in response to backlash. There’s no guarantee here—other than that attacks on a fellow forums member do nothing to help.
I asked for clarification on the upcoming content restrictions for act 6.2 a few days ago and still haven't seen a mod respond. With the direction the contest is going are we now expected to invest all resources into the 6*s we pull now regardless of the lack of utility they may have? You have given us some notice about act 6.2 restrictions unlike the short notice you gave for act 6.1 I would be curious to know is the restrictions for act 6.2 going to be 6*s by class to enter a lane or just x number of 6*s? It would be helpful to have a direction for our future rankup decisions as well as an idea on the value of the resources you keep selling
Also are you going to further increase the restrictions by requiring not only class and rarity rating by adding size rating too to limit player options while tackling future content?
The requirements in Chapter 1 are set as a primer for rest of Act 6. Act 6 Chapter 2 and beyond will also have Champion Requirements, including some more stringent ones like paths that have Class Requirements for your entire team, and Rarity requirements where you must bring [X] amount of 5-Star or 6-Star Champions to complete the quest path.
@Kabam Miike, Kabam absolutely lost my support of the 4* ban with this. I mean, Act 5 release was over the course of a few months. To go from a 4* gate, to path gates of 6* is a little too much, especially if you stagger class and rarity requirements (all must be Science and 3 of this must be 6*).
6* are far too rare to put a restriction or gate of having. I can understand the 4* gates... as many players have a plethora of 5* (though maybe not ones that give the best synergies). I am sorry, but I just joined the rest of the community on this issue.
This is one of the reasons I am against the rarity gate because of the fear of where it would lead. As we can see from the response those fears are justified because its happening.
I asked for clarification on the upcoming content restrictions for act 6.2 a few days ago and still haven't seen a mod respond. With the direction the contest is going are we now expected to invest all resources into the 6*s we pull now regardless of the lack of utility they may have? You have given us some notice about act 6.2 restrictions unlike the short notice you gave for act 6.1 I would be curious to know is the restrictions for act 6.2 going to be 6*s by class to enter a lane or just x number of 6*s? It would be helpful to have a direction for our future rankup decisions as well as an idea on the value of the resources you keep selling
There has never been a path in any quest that required multiple different things. So we most likely wont see path that require 6* champs of specific classes
It’s the depreciation on the investment people have made into 4*s (and now apparently 5*s) that is truly shocking. And the fact that Kabam seems hell bent on doing this regardless of the community’s opinions does not instill trust that this game will be pleasant for the mid-level players in a years time.
@Kabam Miike@Kabam Zibiit will we see any account bans for act6 piloting. We can expect this for legends runs.....
I'd say that depends on the players. If people pilot then there will probably be bans, if not then not but I'm not sure how many people would risk losing an account that is strong enough for Act 6
I asked for clarification on the upcoming content restrictions for act 6.2 a few days ago and still haven't seen a mod respond. With the direction the contest is going are we now expected to invest all resources into the 6*s we pull now regardless of the lack of utility they may have? You have given us some notice about act 6.2 restrictions unlike the short notice you gave for act 6.1 I would be curious to know is the restrictions for act 6.2 going to be 6*s by class to enter a lane or just x number of 6*s? It would be helpful to have a direction for our future rankup decisions as well as an idea on the value of the resources you keep selling
There has never been a path in any quest that required multiple different things. So we most likely wont see path that require 6* champs of specific classes
There has never been content that banned characters by rarity rating before now. While I'd like to believe they would not go to the extent of multiple different things the current gate on act 6 shows we have zero reason to believe they wont go to this extreme to remove certain champs from being viable counters to different content
I asked for clarification on the upcoming content restrictions for act 6.2 a few days ago and still haven't seen a mod respond. With the direction the contest is going are we now expected to invest all resources into the 6*s we pull now regardless of the lack of utility they may have? You have given us some notice about act 6.2 restrictions unlike the short notice you gave for act 6.1 I would be curious to know is the restrictions for act 6.2 going to be 6*s by class to enter a lane or just x number of 6*s? It would be helpful to have a direction for our future rankup decisions as well as an idea on the value of the resources you keep selling
There has never been a path in any quest that required multiple different things. So we most likely wont see path that require 6* champs of specific classes
There has never been content that banned characters by rarity rating before now. While I'd like to believe they would not go to the extent of multiple different things the current gate on act 6 shows we have zero reason to believe they wont go to this extreme to remove certain champs from being viable counters to different content
It's not very funny at all. I don't even mean because he's talking about me. I just mean it's not funny. He's just rambling smack talk. I Unsubbed from him years ago. He's got one agenda, and that's himself.
Wait a second, you’ve been playing for years and you just became uncollected a couple of months ago? You are playing the game at a much slower pace than many players and especially the ones that are upset about these changes. These changes will not affect you for what seems to be a long time. I can’t understand other than just being combative or possibly working for Kabam why you would continue your insessant ranting against any opinion that against these changes. You’ve made yourself clear countless times already. There’s no reason other than I just stated to retort to every single opinion that does not coincide with yours. I’m sure you’ll respond but you really don't need to, we know......
First of all, you comment has nothing to do with what you quoted. Secondly, it affects everyone, and we're not here to vent about other people. Stick to the topic.
easy to say that when everyone is talking about you... topic? kabam doesnt care about the players and talking is cheap
You’re using some logic there. Or should I call it wisdom 😂
This thread is meant to discuss constructively everyone's thoughts and concerns towards the addition of Act 6. Moving off topic to discuss other items that can be completely inflammatory results in a violation of forum rules. Keep the discussion on topic or comments will continue to be removed. We don't mind hearing feedback if it is negative, none of that is being removed unless it breaks forum rules in some manner.
Fed up of the commu ity being treated so poorly. I spend about £30 a month on this game, i know this isnt a great amount of money to some people.....i will never spend anymore now as all i read is Kabam greed ;(
Clearly Kabam is watching this discussion carefully. I will definitely remain constructive.
I get the idea of hard gates. Must be level 25 or 40 or whatever. Must have certain roster depth for certain dungeon rewards. I dont even hate the idea of special events (i call back issues a special event because hey that's where it is) having roster restrictions.
A hard gate like this for 4* champs on the primary game content is an oversight. Assuming that changing that is a non-starter I would suggest you offer rank down tickets. My Thor Ragnarok is useless without his synergy. He cleared almost all of act 5 at rank 4 for me complimented by some 4* for synergy.
I made rank up decisions based on the synergy options he had. Taking that away for your primary game content drastically changes his value. I know RDT are a bit of a taboo concept but when you make such a dramatic change TO THE PRIMARY game mode it seems appropriate to bring that idea to the discussion. I am glad I didn't use an awakening gem on ghost right now because my wasp is a 4*.
This thread is meant to discuss constructively everyone's thoughts and concerns towards the addition of Act 6. Moving off topic to discuss other items that can be completely inflammatory results in a violation of forum rules. Keep the discussion on topic or comments will continue to be removed. We don't mind hearing feedback if it is negative, none of that is being removed unless it breaks forum rules in some manner.
at this point feels it doenst matter what we discuss, kabam will do what kabam wants, im up to talk improvements but if past is any indication it wont matter
I have to say I just became uncollected about 2 months ago, my 5* roster is not great, but it is decent and I have no 6* so I wasn't planning on trying out act 6 anytime soon, but I am a part of the mcoc community and I really do not understand kabam. First I think this proves kabam doesn't read these forums or really care much about what we think as a community and after reading the latest news about more requirements in the later chapters of act 6, (certain amount of 5* & 6* u have to have to run that chapter) it seems pretty clear that kabam is alienating a large chunk of the community and are making act 6, for the most part, for the whales in the game so if u are "free to play" or like myself spend some but not alot kabam is saying sorry this is not for u to prob 75%, if not more, of the community who don't buy every deal in the game. I understand the idea behind dividing the summoners by uncollected and above this is for u and not uncollected this is for you, until u become uncollected and had kabam done that with act 6 it prob would have been fine but instead they all but said "we only care about the people who spend alot of money on this game" and to the rest of us losers who don't, who grind there life away for resources we don't matter, we just have to take the **** sandwich kabam is feeding us and thank them for it and ask for seconds. I truly hope as a community we can get together, whales and all, to do something to make kabam understand we have the power here, they seemed to have forgotten that AGAIN.
Comments
Dr. Zola
I get the idea of hard gates. Must be level 25 or 40 or whatever. Must have certain roster depth for certain dungeon rewards. I dont even hate the idea of special events (i call back issues a special event because hey that's where it is) having roster restrictions.
A hard gate like this for 4* champs on the primary game content is an oversight. Assuming that changing that is a non-starter I would suggest you offer rank down tickets. My Thor Ragnarok is useless without his synergy. He cleared almost all of act 5 at rank 4 for me complimented by some 4* for synergy.
I made rank up decisions based on the synergy options he had. Taking that away for your primary game content drastically changes his value. I know RDT are a bit of a taboo concept but when you make such a dramatic change TO THE PRIMARY game mode it seems appropriate to bring that idea to the discussion. I am glad I didn't use an awakening gem on ghost right now because my wasp is a 4*.