Also if they really cared and wanted everyone to be able to do act 6 they could always change the arenas and instead of making it a free for all fight to see who can score 100 million points (exaggerated I know) to get this week's best champion ever, they post a score, for example 20 million, and everyone who gets 20 million gets the champ, they could have other rewards for who gets the highest scores, but kabam doesn't do this, which incourages cheating and being overly competitive and kabam acts like they only have a certain number of champs they can give out in arenas, and if u believe that ur the exact kind of summoner kabam loves.
They indicated 6.2 may have restrictions like having a certain amount of 5*s and 6*s, and Class Requirements. Not that they would be banning the use of 5*s.
@Kabam Miike@Kabam Zibiit will we see any account bans for act6 piloting. We can expect this for legends runs.....
I'd say that depends on the players. If people pilot then there will probably be bans, if not then not but I'm not sure how many people would risk losing an account that is strong enough for Act 6
Agreed. If we are restricted from using 4* it would be nice to see ALL accounts restricted to just the proper user.
tbm acho vcs restringe os heróis de 5 e 6 * e vem com essa de do usar os de 5* e 6* com nos que so vai benefiar quem gasta dinheiro nesse jogo então pra que vcs oferecem o jogo gratis no Google play
@Kabam Vydious I appreciate you cleaning up the thread, can you enlighten us on if the beta testers were allowed to use there full roster or just 5 & 6 stars?
They indicated 6.2 may have restrictions like having a certain amount of 5*s and 6*s, and Class Requirements. Not that they would be banning the use of 5*s.
Grounded... hit up Seatin's lastest vid. That should give a clue of what the community thinks of you
This thread is meant to discuss constructively everyone's thoughts and concerns towards the addition of Act 6. Moving off topic to discuss other items that can be completely inflammatory results in a violation of forum rules. Keep the discussion on topic or comments will continue to be removed. We don't mind hearing feedback if it is negative, none of that is being removed unless it breaks forum rules in some manner.
Glad to see you are reading the comments hopefully all those comments concerning the death of 4*s has made an impression!
I still remember the reaction post 12.0. I remember how you guys acknowledge that you should listen to the player base.
The player base has spoken. We are not ready to bury our 4*s!!
This is just **** they are limiting 4 stars and removing any need of skill from this game and not only that have stated we will be having 5* banned as well which is just garbage. I rank up my four stars and five stars to be used and sometimes a 4* is better than a 5*. What’s the difference from a 4* at rank 5 and a 5 star at rank 3 there is no difference so why can’t I use the four star. What’s next your gonna ban champs on rank 4/55
To stay on topic about our concern about the use of 4 star champions and so forth the solution is simple, when a company don’t care about the consumer (US) then when they bring deals that’s geared toward 4 stars don’t spend a dime on it. Complaining about this and that really don’t work sometimes not spending and a company losing revenue is the only way to get our point across. I’ve spend a lot on this game and I’m just disappointed now.
Let's look at this from a players point of view....
This whole game has a fundamental basis in **building a roster**, which means acquiring the most powerful champs now, AND using lesser *s to fill in gaps for synergy or champ utility, where RNG has not favored us, to accomplish tasks/complete content. I would say that is one of MCOC's most appealing features (that we love), as with any collection based game. We take pride in what we have built, and get the sense of continued value from past effort in building up the roster. You want to remove that from significant, upcoming content eagerly awaited by your player base. (Sure, the gate doesn't apply to all content, but if anything, this one would be most significant.) From the vast majority of player's POV, there isn't anything appealing about a game design that removes that fundamental appeal in such a broad sweep in forward moving content. Some may be indifferent, and even less, accepting.
Kabam, did you really expect players to jump up and down with excitement over the 4* gate?!!! Seriously! What player is saying to themselves, "Wow, what a great decision. I wish I would have thought of not using any lesser *s. I should just start playing all future content with only 5* and 6* champs, even where there is no gate. It will thoroughly enrich my game, and play experience by making significant moments (etc), and vastly make this game more fun." NO ONE!!!!
We tolerate or even find it acceptably challenging to see *some, limited* champ restrictions here and there (path or chapter), because we might explore other champs for the task, but an entire gate of 4* or less, is absurd. That doesn't make anything more challenging, or move us to other strategies. It simply just *** creates a demand *** for a higher * champ, that we most likely already have in a lesser *. That's the contradiction, and why players are upset. It doesn't make sense, especially given the explanation you have given, and goes against what we love about MCOC.
I think my biggest complaint is that the star restriction has limited those of us with poor RNG luck. Sure I have a decent-sized 5* & 6* roster (almost 60), but one can only do so much with Black Panther, Iron Fist, Khan, Jane Foster, etc.
These champs do have some functionality, but it is severely limited when compared to the likes of Corvus, Domino, Aegon, Omega, CAIW, Mr Sinister, Havoc, etc.
Update 12.0 was done under the premise that the developers wanted to "close the gap" between a few top champs and the rest of the pool. However, every new champ has gotten progressively stronger and have rendered a large percentage of the basic pool as grossly out-matched. In addition, the developers have ramped up the difficulty and complexity of events to cater to these new OP champs. Sure it's good that the devs are updating a few of the older champs, but even those changes get them up to 2018 standards.
93% of my roster are 2017 and older champs and simply are not built to endure this progressing meta. I have been running the same 5-champ team for over 6 months simply because I haven't had much luck. My most recent 4/55 rank up was Iceman just a couple weeks ago because I finally pulled him. Even he is becoming outdated in this progressing meta.
My concern is not that I don't have enough 5 & 6* champs to gain entry, my concern is that they simply aren't good enough to handle new content. My most recent pulls have been Black Panther, Phoenix, 6* Blackbolt, Proxima, Red Cyclops, and Mephisto. Again some functionality but nothing to really build an end-game caliber team around...
Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.
Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators? Ad revenue. Nothing more.
yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though. This might help you understand the concept.
Moving on.
Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire. It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work. Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
You even english...? Please, stay on topic.
Did you read the message yet?
The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
As a reminder for everyone, we encourage debate and won’t shy away from criticism however we expect all users to treat each other with respect.
Insults, personal attacks, harassment, inflammatory posting, or generally rude posts will not be tolerated in either the forums, or private messages. This also includes the use of inappropriate, vulgar, discriminatory or offensive language of any kind.
^^^ How much u want to bet that Kabam made this because of the controversy of the 4* ban.
Limiting conditions that discourage skill and roster planning, goes against every principle that the game is founded upon. These 7 day dramatic meta shifts are also very poorly executed.
Let us use our rosters, enough with these restrictions, don't create more discontempt.
The game is founded on the principle of making money.. people really seem to think kabam cares what the players think or want.. I keep saying it.. if people want kabam to change their mind.. then stop spending money.. 2 days of no revenue due to this 4* thing and the decision would be reversed.. simple as that
Did you even read the thing yourself? Nothing in there even suggests a 5* ban.
Do you know what you and all the other people on this bandwagon mean to seatin and other end game content creators? Ad revenue. Nothing more.
yeah i read it kid and restricting 5*s is right in the same area. Its unnecessary and their explanation of "gates" for 4*s is a joke. So how about you read it son.
First of all, the "flag" button isn't a "dislike" button, mate. Trying to insult me by calling me a kid, while pretty pathetic as an attempt, is actually worth a flag, though. This might help you understand the concept.
Moving on.
Again, did you read it? It says absolutely nothing about a 5* ban. It even mostly talks about making 5* and 6* champs easier to acquire. It hints at certain paths in missions after 6.1 maybe requiring you to have X amount of 5*/6* champs in your team. But calling that a 5* ban is way above semantics. It's just plain old not understanding how words work. Or, still my guess, you actually did not read the whole message.
i read it son and its a restriction. My guess is that your roster doesnt even meet the requirements for act 6.1 anyways so why are you even arguing. whats your ign. Prove me I'm wrong fanboy.
513 posts in 2 months lol seriously dude. You even play?
You even english...? Please, stay on topic.
Did you read the message yet?
The gent named umberto says you even english. Ive read it... and its garbage. You posting every other minute rambling that it isn't wont make it any less garbage.
And that's supposed to make... Sense... I guess?
Okay, look as much as I like turning around in circles, I'd like you to do one thing for me:
Once you finally got to read the whole message yourself, please quote the part that mentions a 5* ban and/or restriction.
Then, although I already quoted and explained that already, I can tell you exactly where your cognitive dissonance stems from.
I might even find an even easier to digest analogy to explain the concept to you then.
Oh, also again, the "flag" button is not a "dislike" button. Flag is spelled f-l-a-g and dislike is spelled d-i-s-l-i-k-e. See the difference?
You spam... what you're doing is spamming. You've stated your incorrect opinion already. Repeating it 30 more times isnt necessary.
First off all i would like to thank you and congratulate you for taking the time to make thid thread.
My name is Don King aka Donkilla AKA the supreme King AKA the supreme Don.
I have been part off the mcoc universe for many years, i was born when Iron Man didnt even exist, i watched the 2000 milliuem before thanos ever considered to cause mass destruction.
Back to the debate in hand. I would like to say KaBam you have done well but also you have done very bad!
Many will feel hard done by, by the fact you made them grind for featured 4* for a good few months and you also made them waste time and resourses on champions now they cannot use on Act 6.
We are very pleased the Act 6 has arrived.
But do you not think it would off been better to give due dilligence to everyone 6 months too 1 year to say that Act 6 will have rank limit?!
It would off given everyone half a chance to use them resourses on Mid tier 5* instead on god tier 4*.
That is my question to you Sir aka Kabam Aka i dont like you anymore.
Comments
I still remember the reaction post 12.0. I remember how you guys acknowledge that you should listen to the player base.
The player base has spoken. We are not ready to bury our 4*s!!
This whole game has a fundamental basis in **building a roster**, which means acquiring the most powerful champs now, AND using lesser *s to fill in gaps for synergy or champ utility, where RNG has not favored us, to accomplish tasks/complete content. I would say that is one of MCOC's most appealing features (that we love), as with any collection based game. We take pride in what we have built, and get the sense of continued value from past effort in building up the roster. You want to remove that from significant, upcoming content eagerly awaited by your player base. (Sure, the gate doesn't apply to all content, but if anything, this one would be most significant.)
From the vast majority of player's POV, there isn't anything appealing about a game design that removes that fundamental appeal in such a broad sweep in forward moving content. Some may be indifferent, and even less, accepting.
Kabam, did you really expect players to jump up and down with excitement over the 4* gate?!!! Seriously!
What player is saying to themselves, "Wow, what a great decision. I wish I would have thought of not using any lesser *s. I should just start playing all future content with only 5* and 6* champs, even where there is no gate. It will thoroughly enrich my game, and play experience by making significant moments (etc), and vastly make this game more fun." NO ONE!!!!
We tolerate or even find it acceptably challenging to see *some, limited* champ restrictions here and there (path or chapter), because we might explore other champs for the task, but an entire gate of 4* or less, is absurd. That doesn't make anything more challenging, or move us to other strategies. It simply just *** creates a demand *** for a higher * champ, that we most likely already have in a lesser *. That's the contradiction, and why players are upset. It doesn't make sense, especially given the explanation you have given, and goes against what we love about MCOC.
These champs do have some functionality, but it is severely limited when compared to the likes of Corvus, Domino, Aegon, Omega, CAIW, Mr Sinister, Havoc, etc.
Update 12.0 was done under the premise that the developers wanted to "close the gap" between a few top champs and the rest of the pool. However, every new champ has gotten progressively stronger and have rendered a large percentage of the basic pool as grossly out-matched. In addition, the developers have ramped up the difficulty and complexity of events to cater to these new OP champs. Sure it's good that the devs are updating a few of the older champs, but even those changes get them up to 2018 standards.
93% of my roster are 2017 and older champs and simply are not built to endure this progressing meta. I have been running the same 5-champ team for over 6 months simply because I haven't had much luck. My most recent 4/55 rank up was Iceman just a couple weeks ago because I finally pulled him. Even he is becoming outdated in this progressing meta.
My concern is not that I don't have enough 5 & 6* champs to gain entry, my concern is that they simply aren't good enough to handle new content. My most recent pulls have been Black Panther, Phoenix, 6* Blackbolt, Proxima, Red Cyclops, and Mephisto. Again some functionality but nothing to really build an end-game caliber team around...
Insults, personal attacks, harassment, inflammatory posting, or generally rude posts will not be tolerated in either the forums, or private messages. This also includes the use of inappropriate, vulgar, discriminatory or offensive language of any kind.
^^^
How much u want to bet that Kabam made this because of the controversy of the 4* ban.
My name is Don King aka Donkilla AKA the supreme King AKA the supreme Don.
I have been part off the mcoc universe for many years, i was born when Iron Man didnt even exist, i watched the 2000 milliuem before thanos ever considered to cause mass destruction.
Back to the debate in hand. I would like to say KaBam you have done well but also you have done very bad!
Many will feel hard done by, by the fact you made them grind for featured 4* for a good few months and you also made them waste time and resourses on champions now they cannot use on Act 6.
We are very pleased the Act 6 has arrived.
But do you not think it would off been better to give due dilligence to everyone 6 months too 1 year to say that Act 6 will have rank limit?!
It would off given everyone half a chance to use them resourses on Mid tier 5* instead on god tier 4*.
That is my question to you Sir aka Kabam Aka i dont like you anymore.