She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question. At the end of the day it wasn't a "wrong" questioned even if it wasn't a block break some may call it that some don't what I don't understand is why is demon so focused on what people call it because at the end of the day it is still a bug that Kabam has addressed so I doubt there is any confusion as kabam clearly know what we are talking about when we mention the so called "block break"
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question. At the end of the day it wasn't a "wrong" questioned even if it wasn't a block break some may call it that some don't what I don't understand is why is demon so focused on what people call it because at the end of the day it is still a bug that Kabam has addressed so I doubt there is any confusion as kabam clearly know what we are talking about when we mention the so called "block break" Agree to disagree but spreading false info of block breaks that dont exist. Isnt the right move no matter how you feel like justifing it.The bug exists its NOT a block break call it what it is
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question. At the end of the day it wasn't a "wrong" questioned even if it wasn't a block break some may call it that some don't what I don't understand is why is demon so focused on what people call it because at the end of the day it is still a bug that Kabam has addressed so I doubt there is any confusion as kabam clearly know what we are talking about when we mention the so called "block break" I dont mind the interaction for the most part. I think it could make the game more interesting if done right from a skill stand point. In interactions where the game let's you drop block lock you should be able to dex out. If you can drop a block to get hit you should be able to move
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question. At the end of the day it wasn't a "wrong" questioned even if it wasn't a block break some may call it that some don't what I don't understand is why is demon so focused on what people call it because at the end of the day it is still a bug that Kabam has addressed so I doubt there is any confusion as kabam clearly know what we are talking about when we mention the so called "block break" I dont mind the interaction for the most part. I think it could make the game more interesting if done right from a skill stand point. In interactions where the game let's you drop block lock you should be able to dex out. If you can drop a block to get hit you should be able to move Yeah I agree I just don't understand why drax doesn't have a problem but domino does as they both have double mediums Drax framerates is faster that's also why drax was bypassing mordo evade
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question. At the end of the day it wasn't a "wrong" questioned even if it wasn't a block break some may call it that some don't what I don't understand is why is demon so focused on what people call it because at the end of the day it is still a bug that Kabam has addressed so I doubt there is any confusion as kabam clearly know what we are talking about when we mention the so called "block break" I dont mind the interaction for the most part. I think it could make the game more interesting if done right from a skill stand point. In interactions where the game let's you drop block lock you should be able to dex out. If you can drop a block to get hit you should be able to move Yeah I agree I just don't understand why drax doesn't have a problem but domino does as they both have double mediums
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Because using the term block break leads to miss-information and confusion of what the actual problem is. OP says the words block break and others think that is the issue when it's not.
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question. At the end of the day it wasn't a "wrong" questioned even if it wasn't a block break some may call it that some don't what I don't understand is why is demon so focused on what people call it because at the end of the day it is still a bug that Kabam has addressed so I doubt there is any confusion as kabam clearly know what we are talking about when we mention the so called "block break" I dont mind the interaction for the most part. I think it could make the game more interesting if done right from a skill stand point. In interactions where the game let's you drop block lock you should be able to dex out. If you can drop a block to get hit you should be able to move Yeah I agree I just don't understand why drax doesn't have a problem but domino does as they both have double mediums Drax framerates is faster that's also why drax was bypassing mordo evade Why can't they max domino's medium do the same as there is no issue dodging draxs medium but there is a struggle with domino's medium so why not make her medium framerate the same as drax
She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. It wasnt an attack. What you did was an attack. To sit there and tell someone not to start a conversation like they dont have the right to talk, which is what you did, is an attack.And just like you have every else has the right to comment also. Did I say they couldn't talk? No, I said don't start the block break conversation back up. Report the bug as it should be. Quit trying to twist and put words into my mouth. So by telling them not to start a conversation you werent telling them not to talk?That's not twisting your words, that's just repeating them.So long as that makes sense to you. Dont start a conversation on a falsehood doesnt mean dont talkIt means gather facts and start the proper conversation. Isnt the best way to gather facts, to ask the question here?This is a forum right? A place to discuss?And a logical, fact based explanation is all that is neccessarry instead of being nasty to people Who was nasty? There was a question and it was told to be the wrong question and explained why it was the wrong question. At the end of the day it wasn't a "wrong" questioned even if it wasn't a block break some may call it that some don't what I don't understand is why is demon so focused on what people call it because at the end of the day it is still a bug that Kabam has addressed so I doubt there is any confusion as kabam clearly know what we are talking about when we mention the so called "block break" I dont mind the interaction for the most part. I think it could make the game more interesting if done right from a skill stand point. In interactions where the game let's you drop block lock you should be able to dex out. If you can drop a block to get hit you should be able to move Yeah I agree I just don't understand why drax doesn't have a problem but domino does as they both have double mediums Drax framerates is faster that's also why drax was bypassing mordo evade Why can't they max domino's medium do the same as there is no issue dodging draxs medium but there is a struggle with domino's medium so why not make her medium framerate the same as drax Animations maybe? I dont program in unity or animations.But drax can land his medium cleaner in less images(frames) then domino due to.the animation from what i see
Well, She doesnt break blocks. Don't start that conversation up again. Learn what the bug is/was. Her medium attack was supposed to be adjusted so that if you block the first hit, you won't be able to release block before the 2nd hit. She cant and will never be able to break a block. Why so technical Cause it's his job to regulate threads on the forums, or didnt you know.At least that's the way he acts in telling people not to start a conversation up. Attack me all you want. I have every right to comment on any thread I choose to. If you are going to post about a bug, get the information right. Well, she breaks through my block, and I am 100% sure I’m not letting go of block at any point.Sounds like a Block Break to me
This has gotten wayyyyy off topic and potentially a reason why kabam hasnt responded to their mess up because the posts get cluttered w/ ****.I posted all the information about it on the 2nd reply of the start of this.