1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
What video said “cull obsidian is being nerfed” and even if it DID say that, it’s a question not a statement.
@Lormif The video has 10k views. What do u think, he’s ballin, dripping with cash? He probably made a few hundred dollars of that video, depending on his monetization. Also, u need to change your definition of clickbait. Clickbait-misleading title and thumbnail that has nothing to do with video. This is what everybody hates Ex. Same title and thumbnail but he played candy crush Misleading title/thumbnail- title or thumbnail that is exaggerated or implies things that aren’t true. This is what people don’t like but ignore if the youtuber still addresses what the title/thumbnail said Ex. What RTM did. He had a misleading title and thumbnail but he addressed the problem properly in The video
Also, u need to change your definition of clickbait. Clickbait-misleading title and thumbnail that has nothing to do with video. This is what everybody hates Ex. Same title and thumbnail but he played candy crush Misleading title/thumbnail- title or thumbnail that is exaggerated or implies things that aren’t true. This is what people don’t like but ignore if the youtuber still addresses what the title/thumbnail Ex. What RTM did. He had a misleading title and thumbnail but he addressed the problem properly in The video
There is nothing illegal or immoral about clickbaiting, but what you're doing is making the community a worse place by wasting peoples time. It's a good method to get a few cheap clicks but it also leads to unsubscribes which destroys long term profitability. Nobody likes a cheap-ploy. Be better than that.
There is nothing illegal or immoral about clickbaiting, but what you're doing is making the community a worse place by wasting peoples time. It's a good method to get a few cheap clicks but it also leads to unsubscribes which destroys long term profitability. Nobody likes a cheap-ploy. Be better than that.
The original video linked has nothing to do with clickbait? Did you even see the full title? The forums won’t show the full video title. So I wrote it out in full
Cull Obsidian - NERFED?! Or FIXED?! Fact-checked Fight data
What I am doing is showcasing someone’s video about the numbers behind the champion.
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
What video said “cull obsidian is being nerfed” and even if it DID say that, it’s a question not a statement.
Rich the Man's video, the one we are talking about from the start...
Not all questions are equal. there is a difference between "Cull Obsidian is being Nerfed?" vs "Is Cull Obsidian being nerfed" The first is a declarative as a question, the second is not. In the first you are declaring something and that is what makes it misleading because you are declaring something that is untrue.
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
What video said “cull obsidian is being nerfed” and even if it DID say that, it’s a question not a statement.
Rich the Man's video, the one we are talking about from the start...
Not all questions are equal. there is a difference between "Cull Obsidian is being Nerfed?" vs "Is Cull Obsidian being nerfed" The first is a declarative as a question, the second is not. In the first you are declaring something and that is what makes it misleading because you are declaring something that is untrue.
The question mark stops it from being a declaration and makes it a QueSTioN. Simple grammar jeez
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
What video said “cull obsidian is being nerfed” and even if it DID say that, it’s a question not a statement.
Rich the Man's video, the one we are talking about from the start...
Not all questions are equal. there is a difference between "Cull Obsidian is being Nerfed?" vs "Is Cull Obsidian being nerfed" The first is a declarative as a question, the second is not. In the first you are declaring something and that is what makes it misleading because you are declaring something that is untrue.
Again, inflection and inference is in the eye/mind or the person reading/hearing it. The title is a question, not a declaration. Watch the video, you even hear the question inflection on “nerfed”.
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
What video said “cull obsidian is being nerfed” and even if it DID say that, it’s a question not a statement.
Rich the Man's video, the one we are talking about from the start...
Not all questions are equal. there is a difference between "Cull Obsidian is being Nerfed?" vs "Is Cull Obsidian being nerfed" The first is a declarative as a question, the second is not. In the first you are declaring something and that is what makes it misleading because you are declaring something that is untrue.
The question mark stops it from being a declaration and makes it a QueSTioN. Simple grammar jeez
Your knowledge of grammar is somewhat wrong. A declarative can be either a statement or a question, but the quesiton is very limited to yes/no questions. You use declarative as a question when you already know, or think you know the question and you are asking the person or to express surprise.
You fight out someone is 40..."You're 40?" is a declarative as a statement as a question.
Have to step in here. That's being dramatic, meaning the emphasis. As for catchy titles, that's a part of the platform you're working on. We can have an existential conversation about right and wrong, but you need to catch peoples' attention on YouTube. That's the market. I'd much rather have a catchy title and decent substance than an abrupt title and gobbledee goop. To be fair, Rich has been quite reasonable in the past, from what I've seen. There are certainly worse ways to use the platform. I don't need to cite. We've seen it. Cull has had 2 fixes. One subsequently made him more broken. The second fixed that. I'm quite positive they don't go into a second fix unless they're sure something is wrong.
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
What video said “cull obsidian is being nerfed” and even if it DID say that, it’s a question not a statement.
Rich the Man's video, the one we are talking about from the start...
Not all questions are equal. there is a difference between "Cull Obsidian is being Nerfed?" vs "Is Cull Obsidian being nerfed" The first is a declarative as a question, the second is not. In the first you are declaring something and that is what makes it misleading because you are declaring something that is untrue.
Again, inflection and inference is in the eye/mind or the person reading/hearing it. The title is a question, not a declaration. Watch the video, you even hear the question inflection on “nerfed”.
It is both a declaration and a question. The question mark does not change a declaration to a non declaration. There is not an interrogative word in the title, which is required for it to not be a declaration, who, what, when, where, is, which etc.
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
What video said “cull obsidian is being nerfed” and even if it DID say that, it’s a question not a statement.
Rich the Man's video, the one we are talking about from the start...
Not all questions are equal. there is a difference between "Cull Obsidian is being Nerfed?" vs "Is Cull Obsidian being nerfed" The first is a declarative as a question, the second is not. In the first you are declaring something and that is what makes it misleading because you are declaring something that is untrue.
Again, inflection and inference is in the eye/mind or the person reading/hearing it. The title is a question, not a declaration. Watch the video, you even hear the question inflection on “nerfed”.
Have to step in here. That's being dramatic, meaning the emphasis. As for catchy titles, that's a part of the platform you're working on. We can have an existential conversation about right and wrong, but you need to catch peoples' attention on YouTube. That's the market. I'd much rather have a catchy title and decent substance than an abrupt title and gobbledee goop. To be fair, Rich has been quite reasonable in the past, from what I've seen. There are certainly worse ways to use the platform. I don't need to cite. We've seen it. Cull has had 2 fixes. One subsequently made him more broken. The second fixed that. I'm quite positive they don't go into a second fix unless they're sure something is wrong.
Have to step in here. That's being dramatic, meaning the emphasis. As for catchy titles, that's a part of the platform you're working on. We can have an existential conversation about right and wrong, but you need to catch peoples' attention on YouTube. That's the market. I'd much rather have a catchy title and decent substance than an abrupt title and gobbledee goop. To be fair, Rich has been quite reasonable in the past, from what I've seen. There are certainly worse ways to use the platform. I don't need to cite. We've seen it. Cull has had 2 fixes. One subsequently made him more broken. The second fixed that. I'm quite positive they don't go into a second fix unless they're sure something is wrong.
@SquishyjrThe_4TH Can you go a bit further to explain how I didn't cover this story correctly? I'm watching my vid back and I take information presented on the forums that looks legit, that hasn't been discredited by either community individuals of Kabam. I have been following Cull Obsidians Changes from; . Covering him in the CCP (mentioned in my video) . The Thanos Favour's not staying paused (bug) of last month . The changes to the damage output based on, as said screenshots 'presented on the forums that look legit'
I personally felt based on the information, the delivery and not putting my opinion in that I covered it correctly. Thanks for the criticism, keeps me in check, cheers.
Well the title did say cull obsidian being nerfed which isn’t true
Can you show what title you are referring to? Because both videos being talked about never once implied that.
https://youtu.be/Vd7TofVK3rs The title on this one I have watched the video and he doesn’t go on like a raving lunatic about how cull is nerfed quite the opposite but nevertheless the title does kinda imply cull was being nerfed
Inference is in the eyes of who reads it.
What does that have to do with my reply all I as doing was talking about how the title does imply he was being nerfed nothing else
But they title doesn’t imply he is being nerfed. “End off Cull” could mean ANYTHING.
That’s the thumbnail the title says cull obsidian being nerfed?
But you know what here is a novel idea, let’s get back to the original topic. Do the numbers support Cull back to his original state, or after the fix is something still off?
That's difficult to say considering he was bugged in his original state. Then fixed, and broke again. I think the real question is, is this the intended state?
Cull is working and hitting now as original release. The only problem is he will steal yo gurl, his milkshake brings all the girls to the yard. Don’t hate the playa, hate the game. Pimpin ain’t easy
Wasn't there 2 fixes pushed? First fix resulted in the Damage increase.
Kind of. He was working as intended at release. The update broke something with his favors falling off. They fixed that but that resulted in a bug giving more damage. Next came the fix of the damage increase
Wasn't there 2 fixes pushed? First fix resulted in the Damage increase.
Kind of. He was working as intended at release. The update broke something with his favors falling off. They fixed that but that resulted in a bug giving more damage. Next came the fix of the damage increase
Comments
1) The headline we are talking that you are defending is:
"Cull Obsidian Is Being Nerfed?"
That is a far cry from "You’ll never believe what happened when I came home'
The one you are defending is intentionally misleading.
2) I dont have hate towards all ploys to make money, just the questionable ones.
3) there are lots of jobs where employing questionable methods will make you more money. You realize there is a reason click bait is nearly universally despised right?
The video has 10k views. What do u think, he’s ballin, dripping with cash? He probably made a few hundred dollars of that video, depending on his monetization. Also, u need to change your definition of clickbait.
Clickbait-misleading title and thumbnail that has nothing to do with video. This is what everybody hates
Ex. Same title and thumbnail but he played candy crush
Misleading title/thumbnail- title or thumbnail that is exaggerated or implies things that aren’t true. This is what people don’t like but ignore if the youtuber still addresses what the title/thumbnail said
Ex. What RTM did. He had a misleading title and thumbnail but he addressed the problem properly in The video
Cull Obsidian - NERFED?! Or FIXED?! Fact-checked Fight data
What I am doing is showcasing someone’s video about the numbers behind the champion.
Not all questions are equal. there is a difference between "Cull Obsidian is being Nerfed?" vs "Is Cull Obsidian being nerfed" The first is a declarative as a question, the second is not. In the first you are declaring something and that is what makes it misleading because you are declaring something that is untrue.
Simple grammar jeez
You fight out someone is 40..."You're 40?" is a declarative as a statement as a question.
Here is a very basic link:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/grammar/british-grammar/questions-statement-questions-you-re-over-18
I'd much rather have a catchy title and decent substance than an abrupt title and gobbledee goop. To be fair, Rich has been quite reasonable in the past, from what I've seen. There are certainly worse ways to use the platform. I don't need to cite. We've seen it.
Cull has had 2 fixes. One subsequently made him more broken. The second fixed that. I'm quite positive they don't go into a second fix unless they're sure something is wrong.
I know. I was making declarative question joke.
The only problem is he will steal yo gurl, his milkshake brings all the girls to the yard.
Don’t hate the playa, hate the game. Pimpin ain’t easy
He was working as intended at release. The update broke something with his favors falling off. They fixed that but that resulted in a bug giving more damage.
Next came the fix of the damage increase