Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against. Yes. There is. For one thing, you give people Rewards they didn't earn based on performance. For another, you incentivize people to report every little Loss because they might score Rewards out of it. The performance is moot based on the playing field being rigged. Not really. By that standard, no one gets anything because you can't call anything fair. That doesn't even make sense. You're potentially screwing a legitimate alliance's season bc they were unfortunate enough to get matched against cheaters. In what world is that fair? I've been on the receiving end of multiple matches through a season against alliances that were docked after our wars. That would have potentially the difference between Plat 3 or Plat 2 for us that season.You're saying you want the leader boards to be accurate how can they be in that situation?I couldn't care less about war anymore personally but people have been getting screwed like this since seasons started and they really need to fix it. Stop feeding the skrulls lol Constantly labeling me and telling others not to participate in discussions with me is adding nothing productive. I'm sorry I'm confused I re-read my post and don't see your name anywhere in it. You are the one calling me out personally when I have done nothing about you. It's a movie reference called Captain Marvel. Please don't feed the Skrulls....they can be anywhere.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against. Yes. There is. For one thing, you give people Rewards they didn't earn based on performance. For another, you incentivize people to report every little Loss because they might score Rewards out of it. The performance is moot based on the playing field being rigged. Not really. By that standard, no one gets anything because you can't call anything fair. That doesn't even make sense. You're potentially screwing a legitimate alliance's season bc they were unfortunate enough to get matched against cheaters. In what world is that fair? I've been on the receiving end of multiple matches through a season against alliances that were docked after our wars. That would have potentially the difference between Plat 3 or Plat 2 for us that season.You're saying you want the leader boards to be accurate how can they be in that situation?I couldn't care less about war anymore personally but people have been getting screwed like this since seasons started and they really need to fix it. Stop feeding the skrulls lol Constantly labeling me and telling others not to participate in discussions with me is adding nothing productive.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against. Yes. There is. For one thing, you give people Rewards they didn't earn based on performance. For another, you incentivize people to report every little Loss because they might score Rewards out of it. The performance is moot based on the playing field being rigged. Not really. By that standard, no one gets anything because you can't call anything fair. That doesn't even make sense. You're potentially screwing a legitimate alliance's season bc they were unfortunate enough to get matched against cheaters. In what world is that fair? I've been on the receiving end of multiple matches through a season against alliances that were docked after our wars. That would have potentially the difference between Plat 3 or Plat 2 for us that season.You're saying you want the leader boards to be accurate how can they be in that situation?I couldn't care less about war anymore personally but people have been getting screwed like this since seasons started and they really need to fix it. Stop feeding the skrulls lol
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against. Yes. There is. For one thing, you give people Rewards they didn't earn based on performance. For another, you incentivize people to report every little Loss because they might score Rewards out of it. The performance is moot based on the playing field being rigged. Not really. By that standard, no one gets anything because you can't call anything fair. That doesn't even make sense. You're potentially screwing a legitimate alliance's season bc they were unfortunate enough to get matched against cheaters. In what world is that fair? I've been on the receiving end of multiple matches through a season against alliances that were docked after our wars. That would have potentially the difference between Plat 3 or Plat 2 for us that season.You're saying you want the leader boards to be accurate how can they be in that situation?I couldn't care less about war anymore personally but people have been getting screwed like this since seasons started and they really need to fix it.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against. Yes. There is. For one thing, you give people Rewards they didn't earn based on performance. For another, you incentivize people to report every little Loss because they might score Rewards out of it. The performance is moot based on the playing field being rigged. Not really. By that standard, no one gets anything because you can't call anything fair.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against. Yes. There is. For one thing, you give people Rewards they didn't earn based on performance. For another, you incentivize people to report every little Loss because they might score Rewards out of it. The performance is moot based on the playing field being rigged.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against. Yes. There is. For one thing, you give people Rewards they didn't earn based on performance. For another, you incentivize people to report every little Loss because they might score Rewards out of it.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. That's absurd. Anyone who thinks there's even a chance someone is cheating is already sending tickets in.There is absolutely no harm in awarding the win to an alliance that was cheated against.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could.
I'd say a good way to get closer to being more proactive would be for further investment in better mod detection technology. Simply put, what Kabam is using now for mod detection isn't cutting it. I can't put a solid number on how many groups or people are doing this but the fact that it's more than a handful is a handful too many in my opinion.There are players out there that have been tracking these groups throughout the seasons as well as the players in those groups that have a better idea on the exact number. Seeing this first hand (as well as multiple videos from others of impossible solo matchups) via sub 5 death tier 1 wars from a 20 million rating alliance I can tell you it's real and at least the group I've seen this first hand with has had zero punishment.
@Lormif To each his own, I really think that we're just arguing semantics here which is getting people riled up. Cheating appears to be rampant to people at the top because we see it A LOT. So it's relative to our experience whereas your experience in the middle is clearly different.now that we've derailed this thread for pages upon pages can we all just agree that cheaters need to be punished and move on.... I have already agreed cheaters need to be punished , shoot that had nothing to do with my original point anyways, that was others derailing it. The argument was made that finding these cheaters should be proactive not reactive, and I asked how, when modding is a reactive thing.
@Lormif To each his own, I really think that we're just arguing semantics here which is getting people riled up. Cheating appears to be rampant to people at the top because we see it A LOT. So it's relative to our experience whereas your experience in the middle is clearly different.now that we've derailed this thread for pages upon pages can we all just agree that cheaters need to be punished and move on....
@Lormif To each his own, I really think that we're just arguing semantics here which is getting people riled up. Cheating appears to be rampant to people at the top because we see it A LOT. So it's relative to our experience whereas your experience in the middle is clearly different.now that we've derailed this thread for pages upon pages can we all just agree that cheaters need to be punished and move on.... I have already agreed cheaters need to be punished , shoot that had nothing to do with my original point anyways, that was others derailing it. The argument was made that finding these cheaters should be proactive not reactive, and I asked how, when modding is a reactive thing. If you know cheaters need to be punished why are you even arguing in the first place that was the point of the thread not what lever your point was
I'd say a good way to get closer to being more proactive would be for further investment in better mod detection technology. Simply put, what Kabam is using now for mod detection isn't cutting it. I can't put a solid number on how many groups or people are doing this but the fact that it's more than a handful is a handful too many in my opinion.There are players out there that have been tracking these groups throughout the seasons as well as the players in those groups that have a better idea on the exact number. Seeing this first hand (as well as multiple videos from others of impossible solo matchups) via sub 5 death tier 1 wars from a 20 million rating alliance I can tell you it's real and at least the group I've seen this first hand with has had zero punishment. Without knowing what they are using how can you even state this? Every competitive game has an issue with modders, and when they come out with a tool to detect them the modders move around it. As long as there is a client that manages any of the data there will be ways of modding it.
Buuuuut we do know the exact mod. It's been passed along. Again, lotta assumptions being made here that just come down to ppl not knowing the realities and wanting to argue word definitions for zero relative up-side. But sometimes, ppl are bored I guess.
Its like you are reading another post and then attriburint it to me. I never said you didnt know what the modders were using, I never even said you made up anything. I said you didnt know what THEY were using. You defined the subject of that they in your quoted post as being KABAM...And then you go on and on about stuff I never said. It is not my fault you dont understand how computer applications work on the layer, or mods for that matter, all that matters is you get what you want and that you are labled as right and everyone else is quite.
Its like you are reading another post and then attriburint it to me. I never said you didnt know what the modders were using, I never even said you made up anything. I said you didnt know what THEY were using. You defined the subject of that they in your quoted post as being KABAM...And then you go on and on about stuff I never said. It is not my fault you dont understand how computer applications work on the layer, or mods for that matter, all that matters is you get what you want and that you are labled as right and everyone else is quite. Good luck to you and your future endeavors. I'm done arguing nothing.
Possibly the greatest troll of all time.
Possibly the greatest troll of all time. I say it's a tie between Lormif and you know who
Possibly the greatest troll of all time. I say it's a tie between Lormif and you know who Voldemort?
It seems off that Android APK mod software is capable of outsmarting 6-figure salary developers who work for a multi-million dollar gaming company. I have contacts that work in security, some have been involved in competitive cyber competitions like CyberPatriot and Wicked6 Cyber Games. According to these people, identifying competitors who cheat comes down to allocation of time and resources. We can't comment on what Kabam is able to allocate in terms of those two variables. We can comment on how mods that got one alliance docked twice during AW Season 9 have been used all of AW Season 11 without alliances who've used them receiving a dock. That doesn't make sense to me.
I'd say a good way to get closer to being more proactive would be for further investment in better mod detection technology. Simply put, what Kabam is using now for mod detection isn't cutting it. I can't put a solid number on how many groups or people are doing this but the fact that it's more than a handful is a handful too many in my opinion.There are players out there that have been tracking these groups throughout the seasons as well as the players in those groups that have a better idea on the exact number. Seeing this first hand (as well as multiple videos from others of impossible solo matchups) via sub 5 death tier 1 wars from a 20 million rating alliance I can tell you it's real and at least the group I've seen this first hand with has had zero punishment. Without knowing what they are using how can you even state this? Every competitive game has an issue with modders, and when they come out with a tool to detect them the modders move around it. As long as there is a client that manages any of the data there will be ways of modding it. So because I don't know the exact mod they are using or where they got it from I must be imagining it right? Trying to be calm here but you gotta be kidding me. I totally understand that modding exists and that it will always to a degree but what I'd like to see is improved mod detection. Modders will work around it? FINE, make them work around it then and actually make the "contest" fair like Mods are constantly preaching. I'm not sure how we're even going back and forth here other than you're purposely pushing buttons.Is your "constructive criticism" that people are ALL crying wolf but AT THE SAME TIME to just be ok with modding because it will always be there? Everyone can't be making this up but then you also admit modding exists... I as well as a lot of others on this thread understand what you were trying to get at with your first handful of posts, modding isn't EVERYWHERE obviously. But 1908438490 posts after that, just please give it up. Modding may have been more prevalent in previous seasons so maybe saying "all time high" isn't factually accurate but the main problem is that it STILL exists. You can say it doesn't in Tier 4 which is probably true but this isn't aimed at Tier 4 but rather Tier 1 more than anything else.Please go argue semantics, punctuation or some other arbitrary aspect of a post on another thread. The people on this thread are trying to at least get a SINGLE REPLY from a mod assuring us they are AT LEAST looking into this. 15 pages deep and nothing of the sort yet which I have to think is due to all of the useless back and forth that normally torments any thread that was created with good intentions.
Imagine hyping up a revamped war map and buffed rewards intended to take 6* champs to the next rank as the game moves forward, and then allowing cheaters to get better rewards than basically every other alliance because you cant detect modified apk that turns the volume sliders into kabam game genie.
Imagine hyping up a revamped war map and buffed rewards intended to take 6* champs to the next rank as the game moves forward, and then allowing cheaters to get better rewards than basically every other alliance because you cant detect modified apk that turns the volume sliders into kabam game genie. They detected it fine in season 9, makes no sense detecting the exact same thing this season can't be done 🤷♂️
Because 1)I am pointing out they are over generalizing, claiming modding is rampant in the entire war system and not just at the very top.2) Pointing out that dispite what they want finding an punishing moders is mostly a reactionary process.3) not being 100% lock step with them.
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. If a gold medal winner at the olympics is caught cheating, you dont think silver place deserves to get promoted to gold?
Cheating is wrong. No question about that. Benefitting from someone else's punishment isn't any better. I don't even think people realize how the system would be inundated by people reporting others if you had the opportunity to gain Rewards from catching cheaters. Support would be swamped by every little chance people could. If a gold medal winner at the olympics is caught cheating, you dont think silver place deserves to get promoted to gold? I will not agree with a system that defaults Win Rewards for catching cheaters.