Beste Inhalte

hiddenblizzard schrieb: »

I reckon he hits like a bug when out of glaive charges so why he's so good?

Read things about him or watch a video. Stop being lazy

Hopefully next buff is colossus and magneto

she doesn't: taunt or power drain or have any immunities, so any node she can handle, so can stark spidey but better. she can't build poise charges. she's not as versatile as stark spidey and she doesn't hit as hard. Also playing her as an attacker her quantum evade can be helpful but isn't reliable.

Placing defenders timely isn’t the issue it’s trying to complete the war at 7 am when the majority of players are sleeping or getting up to go to work, get kids to school, go to school.

Low health, but hits with crazy criticals. Probably top 5 hardest hitters...any thoughts on upgrading her to R5 5*

Wait and see how she turns out after her buff

BrianGrant schrieb: »

Well my loyalty is going down really. I counted the loyalty from the unopened crystals in the equation of loyalty evening out. But the updated costs don't lead me to make interesting choices between AW and AQ, it leads me to just make an alt so I can do both. And with the biggest source of loyalty coming from War, it hurts alliances who would prefer to just focus on AQ. Conceptually I understand the changes and why they were made, but it pushes burnout more than it pushes fun in my opinion. I think Kabam can do a better job at moving the game forward in a way that doesn't burn players out.

Hypothetically speaking, Kabam could take the players' psychology out of the equation. Instead of using high costs to step progress they could put alliances on rails. They could limit alliances to no more than one Map 7 per week, no matter how much resources they have. Then six months later they could increase that limit to two. Then they could look at resource earning averages and if those supported it they could increase that limit to three. They could take the spending costs out of the player's hands and put everyone on a max budget. No one would be allowed to push harder for more resources to unlock more Map 7s than anyone else, so there's no more rat race to push for higher donation spending.

That creates the stepped progress you generally want to have, while also eliminating the possibility for players to push past reasonable limits. It also takes control out of the players' hands. That's not a coincidence. Burnout is a function of players given the opportunity to push higher than healthy. You eliminate burnout in only one of two ways. You make it impossible to push that high, or you make it worthless to push that high. This makes it impossible. We could also cap Map 7 rewards with throttles which would make it worthless to push too high. There are games that exist that do one or both of these. But are either of these a good idea?

borntohula schrieb: »

I own a business. Have a wife and a four year old kid. Schedule suits me just fine. Way better than what it was before. Again, everyone’s lives are different. The EU and UK players in my alliance have zero issues with the current schedule. I understand you might not. But that’s not the be all, end all opinion.

You and your ally can suck it. You 1% that's happy does not cut it. Your location as far as money making for kabam is concerned, is a dump site. Changes need to be made or kabam will lose big time.

The new war timing is flat out insulting and on verge of discrimination against your pacific time zone players. It now ends when we are getting up and starting work, are we supposed to rearrange our schedules cause Kabam wants to put more control in the game????
Why can’t we start when we want? It has worked for years!!! Please change this back and focus on fixing what is wrong with the game instead of adding features that are going to keep breaking the game.
You have serious bugs and gameplay issues that are causing connection dropouts and unresponsivness during fights but instead of working those bugs out you start changing staring times and adding new features to confuse people????