I wouldn't mind a new title if it's just "if you beat 7.4."Once they start adding dumb additions like "have a 6 star champ at R4" or "have 10 R3 6 star champs" or "have a max sig R3 6 star champ" is where I go against new titles.
I wouldn't mind a new title if it's just "if you beat 7.4."Once they start adding dumb additions like "have a 6 star champ at R4" or "have 10 R3 6 star champs" or "have a max sig R3 6 star champ" is where I go against new titles. I mean, if the leaked rewards are true, anyone could get a 6* rank 4 from Act 7 Exploration, which wouldn’t be much of a stretch for a new title.
Kabam Dev A: Who do we design Thronebreaker EQ difficulty for? I'm thinking players who have the roster and experience for Map 8, end gamers, players with already 1 r4 and 30+ r3s.Dev B: Sounds about right. Thronebreaker with 1 r3: Noooo! No r4 requirements, just 1 run of 7.4.Kabam: OkayThe minute EQ drops:Unfair! Cash grab! Slap in the face! Boycott!
I think the new title will come with Act 8, chapter 1. An it will definitely be have a 6 star rank 5 champ requirement too
I wouldn't mind a new title if it's just "if you beat 7.4."Once they start adding dumb additions like "have a 6 star champ at R4" or "have 10 R3 6 star champs" or "have a max sig R3 6 star champ" is where I go against new titles. I mean, if the leaked rewards are true, anyone could get a 6* rank 4 from Act 7 Exploration, which wouldn’t be much of a stretch for a new title. Agree!! If they do come up with a new title with act 7, they may make 2 r4’s a requirement or maybe have some set number of r3’s as requirement.
CD has never been wrong on his leaks so I wouldn't be too skeptical on the rewards 🤷♂️
We could of became thronebreaker with 6.4 and so now with 7.4 arriving could we see a new title? I think with kabam that anything is possible
CD has never been wrong on his leaks so I wouldn't be too skeptical on the rewards 🤷♂️ Datamining can only be so accurate, precisely because they are pulling data from the game client. As a result, they are pulling information that was pushed into the client, but does not necessarily represent the content's final form. That data is sometimes preliminary, sometimes placeholder, and sometimes simply gets changed before go-live. When dataminers have gotten things wrong in the past, it has usually been not because they read the data wrong, but rather because the data changed between when they looked at it and when the content went live. But has he been wrong?
CD has never been wrong on his leaks so I wouldn't be too skeptical on the rewards 🤷♂️ Datamining can only be so accurate, precisely because they are pulling data from the game client. As a result, they are pulling information that was pushed into the client, but does not necessarily represent the content's final form. That data is sometimes preliminary, sometimes placeholder, and sometimes simply gets changed before go-live. When dataminers have gotten things wrong in the past, it has usually been not because they read the data wrong, but rather because the data changed between when they looked at it and when the content went live.
I wouldn't mind a new title if it's just "if you beat 7.4."Once they start adding dumb additions like "have a 6 star champ at R4" or "have 10 R3 6 star champs" or "have a max sig R3 6 star champ" is where I go against new titles. I mean, if the leaked rewards are true, anyone could get a 6* rank 4 from Act 7 Exploration, which wouldn’t be much of a stretch for a new title. Agree!! If they do come up with a new title with act 7, they may make 2 r4’s a requirement or maybe have some set number of r3’s as requirement. I don’t see them saying you need 24+ R3’s but having 2 rank 4’s is possible. I’m guessing if they have a new title it will be with a 1 rank 4 requirement. And anyone that has fully explored act 7 should be able to have one. I am hoping there is a new title tied to fully exploring act 7.
CD has never been wrong on his leaks so I wouldn't be too skeptical on the rewards 🤷♂️ Datamining can only be so accurate, precisely because they are pulling data from the game client. As a result, they are pulling information that was pushed into the client, but does not necessarily represent the content's final form. That data is sometimes preliminary, sometimes placeholder, and sometimes simply gets changed before go-live. When dataminers have gotten things wrong in the past, it has usually been not because they read the data wrong, but rather because the data changed between when they looked at it and when the content went live. But has he been wrong? I remember he once predicted that Winter Soldier and Dormammu would get buffs, but instead it was Mr Fantastic and Vulture. https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/262309/what-are-the-odds-the-3rd-buff-of-may-will-be-leaked/p1https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/262045/predict-mays-3rd-buff/p4Here are two discussions about the false predictions. Obviously it doesn’t say it was Code Dagoth anymore since the video was taken down, but if anyone else can verify that they can remember it being CD as well that would be great.
I wouldn't mind a new title if it's just "if you beat 7.4."Once they start adding dumb additions like "have a 6 star champ at R4" or "have 10 R3 6 star champs" or "have a max sig R3 6 star champ" is where I go against new titles. I mean, if the leaked rewards are true, anyone could get a 6* rank 4 from Act 7 Exploration, which wouldn’t be much of a stretch for a new title. I'm waiting until the official announcement with 7.4. The rewards are SO good in the leak that I'm skeptical. I'd love to be proven wrong though and they turn out to be what the leaked rewards are as they're so good.