**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Will you buy the summ(on)er resort pass?
Reference
Posts: 2,899 ★★★★★
Will you buy the summ(on)er resort pass? 221 votes
0
Comments
Unit milestones covers the cash value and since they will end up doing the objective anyway, they'll get double things for it.
I'm fine with the free things.
Just not a fan of, fights, claim, claim, token, store, calculate hexagon polygon trigonometry alpha beta.
Never have, never will
Just annoys me it costs AUD$15 vs USD$10
We Aussies gets so ripped off
But not this time
To many objektives, to much time. Not enough stuff for me to be excited for.
Realy no.