**UPDATES TO ENLISTMENT GIFTING EVENT:**
To prevent exploitation, we will prevent new Accounts from being able to Gift enlistment crystals. We will also be taking action on those who are using 3rd Party Sellers, Bots and other farms to gift themselves mass amounts of Enlistment Crystals. Lastly, we will be adding an expiration timer to Enlistment Crystals. All unopened Enlistment Crystals will expire on Oct 18 @ 17:00 UTC. For more information, please see this post: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/346104/updates-to-enlistment-gifting-event
To prevent exploitation, we will prevent new Accounts from being able to Gift enlistment crystals. We will also be taking action on those who are using 3rd Party Sellers, Bots and other farms to gift themselves mass amounts of Enlistment Crystals. Lastly, we will be adding an expiration timer to Enlistment Crystals. All unopened Enlistment Crystals will expire on Oct 18 @ 17:00 UTC. For more information, please see this post: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/346104/updates-to-enlistment-gifting-event
Comments
One question, how does emperical data indicate AW and AQ effectiveness?
I thought by now Kabam would have realized that emperical data means squat when it comes to AW and AQ, you need players to test out the champs because obviously your data are full of loopholes like Loki-Hela synergy, GP infinite heavy, Kang's infinite stun lock etc.
How when miike stated that it a 4% chance an that the feature has the same odds as the basic champs in the crystal
Sadly I think you are incorrect. It is likely that 80% of their income comes from 20% of the player base. That 20% will be buying odin after odin's worth of FGMC. The game used to function this way in the past. The difference is that there is no 5* arena so the only way to get the champ immediately at 5* level is by purchasing FGMC.
The interesting question is how Kabam is going work around the Apple requirements as to disclosing drop rates on FGMC.
My suggestion:
Keep the core concepts but keep the odds of our current featured crystal.
- 2 Featured Champs, 6 Basic - total of 8 Champs in Crystal
- Rotated every month instead of 3 months
- Can make the basic champs total meme champs (KK, IP, SG, etc)
Hit "Agree" if you Agree, hit "Insightful" if you don't.
Please comment regardless so Kabam hears the community!
Some people dont have the uncollected title and don't get 5 stars and this will make things a lot more harder
And I’d like to add that although it’s not one of the most used avatars, it’s one of the most effective.
Storm
Cable
Cyclops (New Xavier School)
Thor (Ragnarok)
Taskmaster
Agent Venom
Hawkeye
Modok
Sentry
Void
Ant-Man
Mordo
Thor (Jane Foster)
Loki
Juggernaut
Hela
Phoenix
Ronan
Venompool
Nebula
Punisher (2099)
Civil Warrior
Doctor Octopus
This list worries me to great extremes if you have data to support that they are "effective". I've never seen anyone use ant-man on offense. Never seen anyone use a cyclops either. Venom Pool? This data must be based only by effectiveness, not what the majority of people are using. Just because one skilled player uses Cyclops really well, doesn't mean he's effective. That's like saying one papaya is the same as a banana. They both provide a lot of potassium, but no one eats Papaya because they suck!
Because its bad business for him...he makes money on people watching 5s Featured pulls and other similar type videos.
Agree. that's pretty damn accurate.
Why do you not listen and not learn. And your "metrics" are ludicrous. People are using your highly "effective" champs out of necessity because that's all they've been able to pull and that's all they've been able to afford to go after. All your doing is compounding the problem.
That's like saying "well clearly the potato famine proved that the Irish sure do like potatoes."
Not defending Kabam here but did you read the post? Sentry and Void are in it because they are part of the 6 FEATURED champs since they are new...
So remove those and my point still stands.
(edited)
I was hoping that after 600 plus responses (97% against this travesty) in less than 24 hours, there would be some sort of response. Instead, they are "cleaning up" the thread by removing some valid points in places.
I will assume that this post also may be "cleaned up", so for the few of you who get to read it, good luck.
Most companies would want to know how kabam gets this many followers on their mobile game.