Hammerbro_64 wrote: » Scarlet witch wasn’t even funny. She literally required no skill. Power lock, Infinite stun lock, great damage. She’s way to powerful to bring back. She’s still good how she is. I would appreciate a 5*/6* version of these guys tho.
Hulksmasshh wrote: » All they need to do is bring those champs in as 5* or 6* and they would be god tier again (minus Loki, how did he get in there). 6* versions of Scarlett Witch, Dr strange, Thor, BW would make them very relevant again and some of the best 6*, when they get their proper dupes. It’s kind of strange to have many of the core avengers not available as 5* or 6*.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're comparing apples and oranges.
Dtl7714 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're comparing apples and oranges. It is not an apples to oranges comparison. Kabaam's stated reason for nerfing those characters was that they were too powerful. They then turn around and release more powerful characters. Which means either they lied or the strength of those characters is no longer an issue. Either way unnerfing them isn't an unreasonable request
DaMunk wrote: » While I think SW is probably about right, they didn't need to Nerf the rest the way they did. I'd be interested to see what a 5* doctor Strange would be like but still think he needs buffed a little bit. Diminishing returns nerfed black widow more than enough, she should be restored. If I remember correctly they even nerfed ultrons crit rate by about 7 percent which is ridiculous, while still a great champ a damage dealer he isn't. Out of all of those I'm still upset about how they pushed the Dr. Strange crystals right before the Nerf and the Ultron Nerf because he's the only 5 star out of the bunch. In reality if they don't release them as 5* I don't really care if they fix just 4 star champs. There's lots in the game that needs fixed before fixing 4* only champs. That said I'd be thrilled if they released them as 5s.
tufan_1974 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Dtl7714 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're comparing apples and oranges. It is not an apples to oranges comparison. Kabaam's stated reason for nerfing those characters was that they were too powerful. They then turn around and release more powerful characters. Which means either they lied or the strength of those characters is no longer an issue. Either way unnerfing them isn't an unreasonable request No. They didn't nerf then because they were powerful. They nerfed them because they couldn't create content that those Champs could not cut through. It wasn't just that they were OP. The Champs in combination with the Synergies and the old percentage-based system meant their strength multiplied exponentially. Which is why they also changed the system along with the nerfs. One Champ that has a very specific OP Ability that requires a very specific set of circumstances is not the same as a hot knife through warm butter like those Champs were. They were all-around OP. Nothing could really stop them. That's not the case with the new Champs, and just because one is strong at something doesn't mean it's the same situation. There's a misconception that the nerfs were to make all Champs equally powerful. That's not the case. Some Champs will have very strong skills in some areas, but none have a Swiss Army Knife quality like those Champs did. Behold, kabam's advocate, whatever you say this guy will come and object and defend kabam to the death. if not believe me check out his other posts
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Dtl7714 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're comparing apples and oranges. It is not an apples to oranges comparison. Kabaam's stated reason for nerfing those characters was that they were too powerful. They then turn around and release more powerful characters. Which means either they lied or the strength of those characters is no longer an issue. Either way unnerfing them isn't an unreasonable request No. They didn't nerf then because they were powerful. They nerfed them because they couldn't create content that those Champs could not cut through. It wasn't just that they were OP. The Champs in combination with the Synergies and the old percentage-based system meant their strength multiplied exponentially. Which is why they also changed the system along with the nerfs. One Champ that has a very specific OP Ability that requires a very specific set of circumstances is not the same as a hot knife through warm butter like those Champs were. They were all-around OP. Nothing could really stop them. That's not the case with the new Champs, and just because one is strong at something doesn't mean it's the same situation. There's a misconception that the nerfs were to make all Champs equally powerful. That's not the case. Some Champs will have very strong skills in some areas, but none have a Swiss Army Knife quality like those Champs did.
Saiyan wrote: » "They didn't nerf then because they were powerful. They nerfed them because they couldn't create content that those Champs could not cut through." - Groundedwisdomtooth Did he just agree and disagree at the same time? 1. Not nerfed cuz to powerful 2. Nerfed cuz to powerful for content "My name, is Grounded Wisdom (tooth), and I am the advocate for the RAINING, DEFENDING, UNDISPUTED, BEST GAME DEV ON THE PLANET, KAAAAAAABAMMMMMM!!! (bonus points for those who get that reference and yes I know it's fake) Now to actually add a constructive part to this post. I agree with OP, those guys should come to the 5 star pool and I do thin they will eventually. I mean by this time next year, people will have awakened 6 stars and the pool by that point will be expanded. Why would I bother to use a 4 star BW when I maybe have an awakened 6 star champ in say Act 6? It's a matter of time but I think they should do it sooner than later. Give us that 5 star Abom and Joe Fixit Kabam, we needs them.
Patchie93 wrote: » Saiyan wrote: » "They didn't nerf then because they were powerful. They nerfed them because they couldn't create content that those Champs could not cut through." - Groundedwisdomtooth Did he just agree and disagree at the same time? 1. Not nerfed cuz to powerful 2. Nerfed cuz to powerful for content "My name, is Grounded Wisdom (tooth), and I am the advocate for the RAINING, DEFENDING, UNDISPUTED, BEST GAME DEV ON THE PLANET, KAAAAAAABAMMMMMM!!! (bonus points for those who get that reference and yes I know it's fake) Now to actually add a constructive part to this post. I agree with OP, those guys should come to the 5 star pool and I do thin they will eventually. I mean by this time next year, people will have awakened 6 stars and the pool by that point will be expanded. Why would I bother to use a 4 star BW when I maybe have an awakened 6 star champ in say Act 6? It's a matter of time but I think they should do it sooner than later. Give us that 5 star Abom and Joe Fixit Kabam, we needs them. No his point makes perfect sense if you'd take your head out your ass for a second. The old Thor could basically 10 hit win any fight Sw could permanently stun lock, power lock and regen an entire fight regardless of difficulty Those 2 in their former state could prolly beat LoL without any potions or revives. It may take awhile for SW since she doesn't always hit hard but what does it matter if the opponent can't fight back at all. Thor would just stack 10+ armour breaks and then l3 and do like 80% of the health and finish them before the stun ended. Only champs that could use some love is Bw maybe not back to 100% aar but maybe buff her damage or add some thing to her. Ds could also use some love a bit more power gain and maybe adjust his healing a bit