BUNGALNGAL wrote: » lol you are the one who talked about VPN yet you cannot answer a simple question? truth is your logic is flawed lol. nobody here claims they know how kabam does it, only you with your so called expertise. I do not need to google cause i never claimed i know nor do i want to know. im asking you cause it will only show how dumb you really are.
BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » @DNA3000 so what you mean is if I log in to a friend's device using my account and I play on his device using my own account is considered account sharing? coz if a friend comes to my house, how would kabam know who is playing on his device? That is not considered account sharing. How you would go about telling the difference is a complicated analysis question. this is why checking ip address too is important rather than just relying on mac address and IMEI. IP address proves nothing. We could be sitting side by side and have radically different IP addresses for a variety of reasons. Conversely, if Kabam concluded that two logins with the same IP address can't be pilots because those accounts are in the same place then every pilot with a brain would VPN to the account holder's internet router and appear as their IP address. This capability exists for anyone that owns a cheapo $20 internet router. There are very specific, very limited circumstances in which I would consider routeable non-RFC1918 addresses significant as a part of this kind of analysis. 99% of the time I presume that information is more likely to be misleading than illustrative. thats why you also check mac add and IMEI, having same ip add gives you the benefit of the doubt. its a process and not a one step thing like you say. like you said earlier if a friends goes to your house and he logs in your account, that is account sharing, but if you log in to your account using his device, its not account sharing. How can kabam be sure if what really happened? how can you punish someone if you are unsure. You shouldn't. But it is possible to be sure with high degree of confidence. I've done this type of analysis before, so I know how I would do it. And I can state with authority that in this situation IP address is untrustworthy, and therefore of extremely limited value. To be candid, I know how this works, so I'm offering the benefit of my expertise. But I'm not in any way involved with catching MCOC account sharers and I have no specific compulsion to correct other peoples wild guesses on how this works. If you think it is impossible to be sure, or if you think Kabam is looking at things I doubt they are placing a lot of weight upon, that's entirely your prerogative. lol kabam can tell whose fingers are touching the device? and the vpn thing if you are so expert at it, how would you do it? you said if the pilot have brains which i assume they do, will all members use same vpn or just the pilot use vpn to match the ip of the members? you seem to be expert only at being vague lol why not enlighten us with your brilliance lol the devil is in the details after all.
DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » @DNA3000 so what you mean is if I log in to a friend's device using my account and I play on his device using my own account is considered account sharing? coz if a friend comes to my house, how would kabam know who is playing on his device? That is not considered account sharing. How you would go about telling the difference is a complicated analysis question. this is why checking ip address too is important rather than just relying on mac address and IMEI. IP address proves nothing. We could be sitting side by side and have radically different IP addresses for a variety of reasons. Conversely, if Kabam concluded that two logins with the same IP address can't be pilots because those accounts are in the same place then every pilot with a brain would VPN to the account holder's internet router and appear as their IP address. This capability exists for anyone that owns a cheapo $20 internet router. There are very specific, very limited circumstances in which I would consider routeable non-RFC1918 addresses significant as a part of this kind of analysis. 99% of the time I presume that information is more likely to be misleading than illustrative. thats why you also check mac add and IMEI, having same ip add gives you the benefit of the doubt. its a process and not a one step thing like you say. like you said earlier if a friends goes to your house and he logs in your account, that is account sharing, but if you log in to your account using his device, its not account sharing. How can kabam be sure if what really happened? how can you punish someone if you are unsure. You shouldn't. But it is possible to be sure with high degree of confidence. I've done this type of analysis before, so I know how I would do it. And I can state with authority that in this situation IP address is untrustworthy, and therefore of extremely limited value. To be candid, I know how this works, so I'm offering the benefit of my expertise. But I'm not in any way involved with catching MCOC account sharers and I have no specific compulsion to correct other peoples wild guesses on how this works. If you think it is impossible to be sure, or if you think Kabam is looking at things I doubt they are placing a lot of weight upon, that's entirely your prerogative.
BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » @DNA3000 so what you mean is if I log in to a friend's device using my account and I play on his device using my own account is considered account sharing? coz if a friend comes to my house, how would kabam know who is playing on his device? That is not considered account sharing. How you would go about telling the difference is a complicated analysis question. this is why checking ip address too is important rather than just relying on mac address and IMEI. IP address proves nothing. We could be sitting side by side and have radically different IP addresses for a variety of reasons. Conversely, if Kabam concluded that two logins with the same IP address can't be pilots because those accounts are in the same place then every pilot with a brain would VPN to the account holder's internet router and appear as their IP address. This capability exists for anyone that owns a cheapo $20 internet router. There are very specific, very limited circumstances in which I would consider routeable non-RFC1918 addresses significant as a part of this kind of analysis. 99% of the time I presume that information is more likely to be misleading than illustrative. thats why you also check mac add and IMEI, having same ip add gives you the benefit of the doubt. its a process and not a one step thing like you say. like you said earlier if a friends goes to your house and he logs in your account, that is account sharing, but if you log in to your account using his device, its not account sharing. How can kabam be sure if what really happened? how can you punish someone if you are unsure.
DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » @DNA3000 so what you mean is if I log in to a friend's device using my account and I play on his device using my own account is considered account sharing? coz if a friend comes to my house, how would kabam know who is playing on his device? That is not considered account sharing. How you would go about telling the difference is a complicated analysis question. this is why checking ip address too is important rather than just relying on mac address and IMEI. IP address proves nothing. We could be sitting side by side and have radically different IP addresses for a variety of reasons. Conversely, if Kabam concluded that two logins with the same IP address can't be pilots because those accounts are in the same place then every pilot with a brain would VPN to the account holder's internet router and appear as their IP address. This capability exists for anyone that owns a cheapo $20 internet router. There are very specific, very limited circumstances in which I would consider routeable non-RFC1918 addresses significant as a part of this kind of analysis. 99% of the time I presume that information is more likely to be misleading than illustrative.
BUNGALNGAL wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » @DNA3000 so what you mean is if I log in to a friend's device using my account and I play on his device using my own account is considered account sharing? coz if a friend comes to my house, how would kabam know who is playing on his device? That is not considered account sharing. How you would go about telling the difference is a complicated analysis question. this is why checking ip address too is important rather than just relying on mac address and IMEI.
DNA3000 wrote: » BUNGALNGAL wrote: » @DNA3000 so what you mean is if I log in to a friend's device using my account and I play on his device using my own account is considered account sharing? coz if a friend comes to my house, how would kabam know who is playing on his device? That is not considered account sharing. How you would go about telling the difference is a complicated analysis question.
BUNGALNGAL wrote: » @DNA3000 so what you mean is if I log in to a friend's device using my account and I play on his device using my own account is considered account sharing? coz if a friend comes to my house, how would kabam know who is playing on his device?
NDK13 wrote: » Guys fighting over stupid stuff. OP core is no more they bought iso8b. What do u say about this
DTMelodicMetal wrote: » NDK13 wrote: » Guys fighting over stupid stuff. OP core is no more they bought iso8b. What do u say about this Hilarious, so much $ and manipulation invested to get video game rewards
Hulksmasshh wrote: » DTMelodicMetal wrote: » NDK13 wrote: » Guys fighting over stupid stuff. OP core is no more they bought iso8b. What do u say about this Hilarious, so much $ and manipulation invested to get video game rewards You’d be surprised how ridiculous and how much stupidity went into that exchange No $ was involved
JohnnyVsTheContest wrote: » When 1 guy logs in and out of 4 different people's accounts to finish 2 of the toughest nodes, 3 minibosses, and the boss with only 1 death, it's not "having fun playing a game with buddies". It's cheating because you needed a competitive advantage to win because you weren't good enough as an alliance to be at the level at which you rank. And yes. This happened today. It's not fair competitively, and it needed to be dealt with.
Spera wrote: » @GroundedWisdom The irony is the excuse is that's what it takes at a "competitive level". The reality is with a system based on Rank Rewards, cheating is not only unnecessary, it also affects everyone else. Problem is, those who cheat generally don't care about other people. "Cheating is not only necessary "??? It's never necessary.
Double_Dragon2 wrote: » Kabam's decision to go after piloting was a great move to ensure the integrity of the game, and I'm all for that, but it will come with a giant cost and who knows what that cost could be. Alliances of all tiers pilot to some degree. Some egregiously, others minimally, but regardless of how badly, many do it. It's ingrained in MCOC alliance culture to pilot. What we're seeing now (and going to see more of), is an implosion of alliances across all tiers. Why? Because we've been told to knock it off or get punished, which means get really good really soon or hit the bricks! Players who used to rely on a buddy to finish the mini boss for the longest time can't hang in their alliance anymore. Their skills weren't that good and their account is miles ahead. And what are they going to do? Many are quitting. Many will have to go down 6 tiers to find a suitable alliance. Many will say, "to hell with this game. i used to play with my buddies for years and now i'm getting booted. screw this". I'm all for punishing pilots, but realize what this game has turned into. It's no longer a fun game with friends. It's a sudden race to match up with equally skilled partners and that's it. Kabam has inadvertently stuck a giant wedge between long term in-game friends and rewards, and I don't see how this can be healthy at all for retention. You didn't just break up the super mercs running a dozen war bosses a day, you're changing the experience across all alliances. Is it better for the game in the long run? Probably. But if there's no one left to play then it's no longer a game. You think season 1 was pressure? Right now it's 10 times that.
Double_Dragon2 wrote: » What we're seeing now (and going to see more of), is an implosion of alliances across all tiers. Why? Because we've been told to knock it off or get punished, which means get really good really soon or hit the bricks!
Double_Dragon2 wrote: » Kabam's decision to go after piloting was a great move to ensure the integrity of the game, and I'm all for that, but it will come with a giant cost and who knows what that cost could be. Alliances of all tiers pilot to some degree. Some egregiously, others minimally, but regardless of how badly, many do it. It's ingrained in MCOC alliance culture to pilot. What we're seeing now (and going to see more of), is an implosion of alliances across all tiers. Why? Because we've been told to knock it off or get punished, which means get really good really soon or hit the bricks! Players who used to rely on a buddy to finish the mini boss for the longest time can't hang in their alliance anymore. Their skills weren't that good and their account is miles ahead. And what are they going to do? Many are quitting. Many will have to go down 6 tiers to find a suitable alliance. Many will say, "to hell with this game. i used to play with my buddies for years and now i'm getting booted. screw this".
DTMelodicMetal wrote: » Many top alliances have stopped piloting and recruited more skilled members to replace old members who allowed their accounts to be piloted. Complaining that you can’t play in the same alliance as your friends because you won’t get good enough AW season rewards without piloting is selfish reasoning.
Kabam said the goal of AW Seasons was to determine the most skilled alliance. Now, finally, that can be accomplished.
Epsilonlogan wrote: » Got an announcement from the game on an alliance member violating the Alliance TOS. How do I find out what the infraction was and who did it so I can insure it won’t happen again???????
Rets wrote: » Epsilonlogan wrote: » Got an announcement from the game on an alliance member violating the Alliance TOS. How do I find out what the infraction was and who did it so I can insure it won’t happen again??????? Same here, id like to know who it was so i can ban him, our hopes of platinum are gone now
Asmodeyus wrote: » So I'm actually curious, and really would like to know an answer to this. "HOW" do you know the cheating is going on. For example, did you strike a logarithm somewhere that didn't it? IP altering? I get the 'what' they're looking for, I'm just curious as to HOW it's being discovered. The main reason I ask is because, what stops anyone from saying Player 1 is cheating, Player 465 is cheating, etc. In all honestly it just looks like accusing with no proof. Is any 'Proof' being submitted to the alliance leaders?