**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Anniversary deals?
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I understand that these may have a unique part of the history but for 99.99. I mean is this a trophy purchase? Why would anyone pay 99.99 to get a groot.
1. I agree that having this crystal could be fun for some people, but the price tag is straight out of the 2 year anniversary’s time period. This is a shot at a few decent champs and the rest are trash, some had said $30, personally I wouldn’t spend more than $10, but not all deals are for everyone. At $99 this screams out of touch.
2. I am sorry, but you missed the boat on champ selection. Who has ever wanted to “save for” Groot, RR, IF, CW, Cyclops, Crossbones, CA, MK, VP. Those are a selection of some of the worst champs in the game.
Top champs guys
1. You didn’t charge us $100 to play it.
2. The reward for guessing correctly was a current relevant champ (not a useless relic)
3. It wasn’t disguised as a reward but more as the boobie prize that it is.
Blade isn't what he used to be, most of the new good defenders are hero's or mercs.
Karnak - first champ to have the need for 2 different Cats
Civil Warrior & Gulli - MCOC made champions
Star-Lord - Champion used to complete ROL and LOL
Electro - First champ to have dmg to be dealt back to the champ upon hitting them
Hood - First champ with invisibility
Human Torch - first Pre Fight ability
Crossbones - first champ to possibly convert debuffs into buffs
@Kabam Miike how did i do
Where my confusion stems from is why the in-game mail announced that:
If the reasoning behind the champ selection was, as you stated, based on a certain merit attributed to each champ for their unique contribution to the game’s history, why was that not communicated in the official announcement? Why only after public backlash?
You can see why people would find this explanation a bit hard to believe, it’s easy to perceive it as a hurried attempt to lend a sliver of credibility to a baffling offer.
I don’t particularly have a problem with the offer itself. I saw it and was momentarily bemused, and forgot about it until I came across this thread. But the explanation you gave seemed a little odd. I fully understand that you don’t make these decisions, but I feel like this could have been handled a little better.
Yeah ?
Yeah, okay, I got nothing.
“Not going to appeal to everybody”?? Who the hell does this appeal too? I seriously hope the person who decided this offer was a good idea for the 5 YEAR ANNIVERSARY! Was actually fired, what a slap in the face for guys like me who have been around since day one