Mcord11758 wrote: » Man do I feel bad for people with rank 4 5* juggs. What an absolute waste of a champ at this point
Vdh2008 wrote: » Mcord11758 wrote: » Man do I feel bad for people with rank 4 5* juggs. What an absolute waste of a champ at this point I would think he would be top of the list for legend runs. I want one more than I want a R4 Magik now.
King_turd123 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Meant to vote No. Small phone, big thumbs. RDTs are not for changes to content. No matter who you Ranked, they still perform the same. The Champs haven't changed at all. Yeah, let me know how many people in your alliances used 7 t4cc and t2 alphas to rank up Juggs. Now to be a pushover and yield no diversity in the alliance Doesn't matter. Whether you used him for War, Questing, or the Arena, Juggs still functions the same. They don't give Tickets for changes to content because content can change at any time. They would constantly be giving Tickets. That's not what they're for. They're for changes to the Champs themselves. There's no such thing as wasting Resources to Rank anyone, from a progression standpoint, and that's what the game is all about. Not having the most popular Roster for your content all the time. It's about Ranking everything to grow. Some people are selective and only want the "best". That's entirely up to how they want to play. However, the team is not responsible for giving Tickets everytime something new is added. The Champs haven't changed at all. Just the most popular use for them. Where on the Poll did you see the question "Does Kabam only give RDT's for changes to champs?" Thats not the poll here, we are aware of how and why we originally got them. Its a question as to whether or not the community feels they deserve them, not Kabams standing on RDT's. You have said your opinion, move on. You are not in the same scenario and your logic is flawed highly to say champs still serve the same purpose in the game. It's not my opinion. It's their stance, and it's been given many times. So why not give your opinion? Imagine this forum if everyone quoted the (somebody get me a word for Kabam+Koran) back and forth at each other? Kabam DOES want to hear from players
GroundedWisdom wrote: » R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Meant to vote No. Small phone, big thumbs. RDTs are not for changes to content. No matter who you Ranked, they still perform the same. The Champs haven't changed at all. Yeah, let me know how many people in your alliances used 7 t4cc and t2 alphas to rank up Juggs. Now to be a pushover and yield no diversity in the alliance Doesn't matter. Whether you used him for War, Questing, or the Arena, Juggs still functions the same. They don't give Tickets for changes to content because content can change at any time. They would constantly be giving Tickets. That's not what they're for. They're for changes to the Champs themselves. There's no such thing as wasting Resources to Rank anyone, from a progression standpoint, and that's what the game is all about. Not having the most popular Roster for your content all the time. It's about Ranking everything to grow. Some people are selective and only want the "best". That's entirely up to how they want to play. However, the team is not responsible for giving Tickets everytime something new is added. The Champs haven't changed at all. Just the most popular use for them. Where on the Poll did you see the question "Does Kabam only give RDT's for changes to champs?" Thats not the poll here, we are aware of how and why we originally got them. Its a question as to whether or not the community feels they deserve them, not Kabams standing on RDT's. You have said your opinion, move on. You are not in the same scenario and your logic is flawed highly to say champs still serve the same purpose in the game. It's not my opinion. It's their stance, and it's been given many times.
R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Meant to vote No. Small phone, big thumbs. RDTs are not for changes to content. No matter who you Ranked, they still perform the same. The Champs haven't changed at all. Yeah, let me know how many people in your alliances used 7 t4cc and t2 alphas to rank up Juggs. Now to be a pushover and yield no diversity in the alliance Doesn't matter. Whether you used him for War, Questing, or the Arena, Juggs still functions the same. They don't give Tickets for changes to content because content can change at any time. They would constantly be giving Tickets. That's not what they're for. They're for changes to the Champs themselves. There's no such thing as wasting Resources to Rank anyone, from a progression standpoint, and that's what the game is all about. Not having the most popular Roster for your content all the time. It's about Ranking everything to grow. Some people are selective and only want the "best". That's entirely up to how they want to play. However, the team is not responsible for giving Tickets everytime something new is added. The Champs haven't changed at all. Just the most popular use for them. Where on the Poll did you see the question "Does Kabam only give RDT's for changes to champs?" Thats not the poll here, we are aware of how and why we originally got them. Its a question as to whether or not the community feels they deserve them, not Kabams standing on RDT's. You have said your opinion, move on. You are not in the same scenario and your logic is flawed highly to say champs still serve the same purpose in the game.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Meant to vote No. Small phone, big thumbs. RDTs are not for changes to content. No matter who you Ranked, they still perform the same. The Champs haven't changed at all. Yeah, let me know how many people in your alliances used 7 t4cc and t2 alphas to rank up Juggs. Now to be a pushover and yield no diversity in the alliance Doesn't matter. Whether you used him for War, Questing, or the Arena, Juggs still functions the same. They don't give Tickets for changes to content because content can change at any time. They would constantly be giving Tickets. That's not what they're for. They're for changes to the Champs themselves. There's no such thing as wasting Resources to Rank anyone, from a progression standpoint, and that's what the game is all about. Not having the most popular Roster for your content all the time. It's about Ranking everything to grow. Some people are selective and only want the "best". That's entirely up to how they want to play. However, the team is not responsible for giving Tickets everytime something new is added. The Champs haven't changed at all. Just the most popular use for them.
R4GE wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Meant to vote No. Small phone, big thumbs. RDTs are not for changes to content. No matter who you Ranked, they still perform the same. The Champs haven't changed at all. Yeah, let me know how many people in your alliances used 7 t4cc and t2 alphas to rank up Juggs. Now to be a pushover and yield no diversity in the alliance
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Meant to vote No. Small phone, big thumbs. RDTs are not for changes to content. No matter who you Ranked, they still perform the same. The Champs haven't changed at all.
JasperPhairPhax wrote: » I'm usually not one to complain or say "Wheres my free stuff!" I understand how hard it must be to change content and keep everyone happy. Having said that, I can not understand in what world anyone would think the function of our champions hasn't changed. Each month we get 2 new champions, one seems to be geared towards defense, one offense. Even kabam knows when they design champs they are meant to be stronger for one purpose or the other. Does anyone really attack with a Mordo? Is anyone R4 a 5* OG spidey to quest with? No. Thse decisions were made for one purpose. That purpose is now a negative. Which is fine. Alot of us are open to change, however with as rare as T2a are we should be given the chance to adjust. Shoot, im not even saying it should be free. Sell them for units. But its hard not to look at a bunch of ranks on the roster you made for the team and not feel like you just got punched in the gut. Change can be great, just allow us to change with you.
STShorty wrote: » People who are saying NO aren't looking at the whole picture. Champions are ranked specifically for different purposes. I myself have ranked specifically Black panther CW, Dormammu, and Mordo for AW defense. Other then arena they do not get used for anything else. The fact that diversity is being introduced into the game and is being used as a key part to AW defense I can not utilize them without getting into a fight with an Alliance mate over who is bringing their's to war. This makes it very difficult when we established a specific team for war and now being told change it up or you will lose. So why shouldn't RDT be given out to fix this? Now some may be asking for crazy amounts and I do not agree with that, but maybe 2 of each.
CoquiFongo wrote: » R4GE wrote: » I finally had to block that guy. He's in an alliance with a 400 war rating and constantly argues AW against the community -sigh- Where did you see he is in a 400 war rating alliance? And yes I agree, that does affect someones opinion on this issue. It is the same as someone who has never driven a car in a major city discussing traffic jams. Also as for the topic, I am torn between RDTs and not having them. While I agree that the game should be 1 direction, you rank, who you rank, and don't look back. Part of me also agrees that with major changes to the game it affects how champions are utilized. For example I was torn between using a Generic on Dormamu or Mordo and taking them both to 5/50 for war but now thats not needed since my alliance mates have them. While I am glad I didn't, I would be upset if I had. And yes the game is about progression and ranking up champions, but MR. GW its not all about ranking everyone as soon as you get them, that is a waste of materials and planning. Hence why I have enough mats to R4 two 5 Stars but I won't because they will not change my PI or team, so why waste the mats. -Aerial Ignorance signing off. PS I still think we should be asking for more materials to rank champions instead of switching them, but something needs to be addressed about all of the alliances with 10x Magiks, Juggs, NC, Mordos, and Spiders collecting dust now in our accounts.. And don't say Glory since those T2s are an insult.
R4GE wrote: » I finally had to block that guy. He's in an alliance with a 400 war rating and constantly argues AW against the community -sigh-
WOK wrote: » @GroundedWisdom , you've repeated all too many times, worded creatively the 1 reason RDT's were specifically created for, quoting Kabams announcements to the letter each time someone gives their reasons why they feel it is warranted. Some reasons are similar yes, but there are a handful that differ and IMO very valid. Is it not the intent of these forums and polls to cast some different perspectives from different players to voice their opinions on changes that may be needed? Since when did "Rules or Reasons put forth" on a given situation become set in stone to as be "untouchable" to scrutiny and not welcome to consideration for revision?? Especially with the undeniable fact that we are constantly faced with changes in content which IMO highly outweighs the importance of changes/non changes made to individual champs.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » WOK wrote: » Since they've already given their official word on the subject multiple times, both in general and in response to the War System changes. So in essence what you are stating is that it is in fact written in stone and cannot be subject for reevaluation considering the current situation,nor future situations as well? Which would also imply that there is no use of the forums for suggestions and requests and its merely a shell category?
WOK wrote: » Since they've already given their official word on the subject multiple times, both in general and in response to the War System changes.
CoquiFongo wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » What I'm saying is it's brought up enough times to know the response now. What people post is entirely up to them. I'm not censoring what people say. I am reiterating the fact that they're not giving Tickets for content changes. Thank you for reiterating Kabam's stance on RDTs. Now since WE ALL KNOW your fact/opinion please move on and stop repeating yourself. As you just said this is an open forum and people want to have a discussion and not be hounded. Since you clearly choose not to respond to any of the points I and many others have made in this discussion you are a distraction and not an addition. -Aerial Ignorance
GroundedWisdom wrote: » What I'm saying is it's brought up enough times to know the response now. What people post is entirely up to them. I'm not censoring what people say. I am reiterating the fact that they're not giving Tickets for content changes.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » It's also been given for the subject of 6*s. The Tickets are only intended for changes to the Champs specifically.http://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/93501#Comment_93501
Heywood wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » It's also been given for the subject of 6*s. The Tickets are only intended for changes to the Champs specifically.http://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/93501#Comment_93501 Who cares what their intent was. They changed war scoring to a point where having 2 of the same 5/50 champ on defense yields less points than placing 2 different 2* champs in the game. We wasted resources because of this change. Rank down tickets seem like an appropriate response because of these changes. That or fix the war scoring so diversity doesn't count as much.