Has Kabam given us a reason to why for missing 5*?

Unfortunately... I don't feel like going through forums to find an answer. But I do believe we deserve an answer... We know they will be released as 5*. They just want us to wait until all content of Act 5 or Act 6 is released. So we can't use them now. And when they do come out with them. Its just another way for use to chase after our favorites.
Wolverine
Scarlet Witch
Thor
Abomination
Captain WW2
Daredevil Classic
War Machine
Electro
Vision
Deadpool

Comments

unknown

This content has been removed.

FAL7EN

No they haven't

Drewbe14

Im in total agreement. I want to see that 5* wolvie and ww2

Amonthir

They said something about how those champs never had a 5* version before, so they could not put them in crystal, even though 5* versions of them are obviously in the code for use as enemies.

DarkestDestroyer

We need an answer because being out a new level Star shouldn't be possible without all being a 5* at least.

MAIN MARVEL CHARACTERS being left as 4* Max, while champs 95% of people no one has heard of are a 5* - Hood, Hyperion, I mean before Netflix did the shows I would have no idea who Luke Cage even was.

Not saying Hood or Hyp are rubbish champs as they are sweet, but to leave Wolverine rotting away as a 4* is a disgrace when he is one of the first characters you think of in regards to Marvel

NOOOOOOOOPEEEEE

How dare you leave out the god Joe Fixit

DaMunk

What concerns me is they bring out new 5* with some of these as synergies. Doc Oc has Electro as his best synergy. So if I rank 4 my 5* Doc I can't have a 5* Electro to go with him in quests or whatever.

Kingyakoopa

Sorry I left out... In which they have not explained this either... Hell Medusa has synergy with Black Bolt... Why no 5*?
Joe Fixit
Doctor Strange
Ms.Marvel
Black Bolt
Marvel Now Magneto
Gamora

Kabam... we want a reason why? We don't care about 6*... We care about 5* SW... DS... DD... Thor... BB... Wolverine... Captain WW2... Electro... Visions... and Deadpools...

Viper1987

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

Kingyakoopa

Are you Kabam Viper? Not a good enough reason to sell us short... If all champs are being made monthly... We expect all champs to be added as 5*... This does not guarantee that we will get those champs. But we should still have a chance. Cause to me that's not fair on there part to not release all champs. I want a real answer from Kabam...

Viper1987

Kingyakoopa wrote: »

Are you Kabam Viper? Not a good enough reason to sell us short... If all champs are being made monthly... We expect all champs to be added as 5*... This does not guarantee that we will get those champs. But we should still have a chance. Cause to me that's not fair on there part to not release all champs. I want a real answer from Kabam...

....Ok then nevermind.

TheBaldAvenger

Viper1987 wrote: »

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

By that logic, There shouldn't be a 5* version of gwenpool, iceman, archangel, dr voodoo to name a few. They should make all champs a 5* version before releasing 6* for sure.

DarkestDestroyer

Kingyakoopa wrote: »

Are you Kabam Viper? Not a good enough reason to sell us short... If all champs are being made monthly... We expect all champs to be added as 5*... This does not guarantee that we will get those champs. But we should still have a chance. Cause to me that's not fair on there part to not release all champs. I want a real answer from Kabam...

Don't always get what you want, the guy answered the question, like others... stop lashing out because your butt-hurt, I'm gutted Wolvie isn't a 5*. Not being a tool about it though

Viper1987

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

By that logic, There shouldn't be a 5* version of gwenpool, iceman, archangel, dr voodoo to name a few. They should make all champs a 5* version before releasing 6* for sure.

Well they were also original champs, not featured champs. Since they are adding featured champs, of course they have to add AA, Iceman, and DV. There's a small but distinguished difference.

TheBaldAvenger

Viper1987 wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

By that logic, There shouldn't be a 5* version of gwenpool, iceman, archangel, dr voodoo to name a few. They should make all champs a 5* version before releasing 6* for sure.

Well they were also original champs, not featured champs. Since they are adding featured champs, of course they have to add AA, Iceman, and DV. There's a small but distinguished difference.

Not really, the answer was the champs are too OP. Well the ones I listed are just as OP if not more than the original champs missing so really no reason not to add them

LocoMotives

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

By that logic, There shouldn't be a 5* version of gwenpool, iceman, archangel, dr voodoo to name a few. They should make all champs a 5* version before releasing 6* for sure.

Well they were also original champs, not featured champs. Since they are adding featured champs, of course they have to add AA, Iceman, and DV. There's a small but distinguished difference.

Not really, the answer was the champs are too OP. Well the ones I listed are just as OP if not more than the original champs missing so really no reason not to add them

Well they can't go back and delete 5* gwenpool from the game now, can they? And can't skip a feature 5* because "we think this champ may be TOO good!" Doesn't make much sense either.

TheBaldAvenger

LocoMotives wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

By that logic, There shouldn't be a 5* version of gwenpool, iceman, archangel, dr voodoo to name a few. They should make all champs a 5* version before releasing 6* for sure.

Well they were also original champs, not featured champs. Since they are adding featured champs, of course they have to add AA, Iceman, and DV. There's a small but distinguished difference.

Not really, the answer was the champs are too OP. Well the ones I listed are just as OP if not more than the original champs missing so really no reason not to add them

Well they can't go back and delete 5* gwenpool from the game now, can they? And can't skip a feature 5* because "we think this champ may be TOO good!" Doesn't make much sense either.

Never said they should. Was just pointing out that the logic that they can't add the others as 5* coz they are too OP doesn't make sense when you have the others as 5* and it's not exactly broken the game. So no reason why they can't be added

Viper1987

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

LocoMotives wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

By that logic, There shouldn't be a 5* version of gwenpool, iceman, archangel, dr voodoo to name a few. They should make all champs a 5* version before releasing 6* for sure.

Well they were also original champs, not featured champs. Since they are adding featured champs, of course they have to add AA, Iceman, and DV. There's a small but distinguished difference.

Not really, the answer was the champs are too OP. Well the ones I listed are just as OP if not more than the original champs missing so really no reason not to add them

Well they can't go back and delete 5* gwenpool from the game now, can they? And can't skip a feature 5* because "we think this champ may be TOO good!" Doesn't make much sense either.

Never said they should. Was just pointing out that the logic that they can't add the others as 5* coz they are too OP doesn't make sense when you have the others as 5* and it's not exactly broken the game. So no reason why they can't be added

It's a combination deal. They fit multiple criteria. 1. They are OP champs and help finish hard game content easier than say if you had Luke Cage or Spider Gwen. 2. They are original champs. Kabam can decide which older champs are added to the 5* basics, but like @LocoMotives said, you can't just delete a featured or skip them because they're OP.

Kingyakoopa

DarkestDestroyer wrote: »

Kingyakoopa wrote: »

Are you Kabam Viper? Not a good enough reason to sell us short... If all champs are being made monthly... We expect all champs to be added as 5*... This does not guarantee that we will get those champs. But we should still have a chance. Cause to me that's not fair on there part to not release all champs. I want a real answer from Kabam...

Don't always get what you want, the guy answered the question, like others... stop lashing out because your butt-hurt, I'm gutted Wolvie isn't a 5*. Not being a tool about it though

I simply asked the question... Not hurt... I still think we all deserve a reason. And let me tell you... I have a solid 5* squad
Dormammu duped R4
Iceman duped R4
Nebula R4
Kingpin duped R3
Mordo R3
Doctor Voodoo R3
Etc... Etc... Etc...
I can continue... but I still want the champs missing from the 5* pull. Because I got t4cc waiting for only the best of the best.

TheBaldAvenger

Viper1987 wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

LocoMotives wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

TheBaldAvenger wrote: »

Viper1987 wrote: »

Because most of those champs are OP and still pull a lot of weight even as a 4*. If a 5* version were to be released, it would hurt their bottom line for sure. Although I'm not sure why they haven't added Abom, WM, and Electro. Seems like pretty good champs for them to add to hinder people getting better ones like SL and Magik.

By that logic, There shouldn't be a 5* version of gwenpool, iceman, archangel, dr voodoo to name a few. They should make all champs a 5* version before releasing 6* for sure.

Well they were also original champs, not featured champs. Since they are adding featured champs, of course they have to add AA, Iceman, and DV. There's a small but distinguished difference.

Not really, the answer was the champs are too OP. Well the ones I listed are just as OP if not more than the original champs missing so really no reason not to add them

Well they can't go back and delete 5* gwenpool from the game now, can they? And can't skip a feature 5* because "we think this champ may be TOO good!" Doesn't make much sense either.

Never said they should. Was just pointing out that the logic that they can't add the others as 5* coz they are too OP doesn't make sense when you have the others as 5* and it's not exactly broken the game. So no reason why they can't be added

It's a combination deal. They fit multiple criteria. 1. They are OP champs and help finish hard game content easier than say if you had Luke Cage or Spider Gwen. 2. They are original champs. Kabam can decide which older champs are added to the 5* basics, but like @LocoMotives said, you can't just delete a featured or skip them because they're OP.

Absolute nonsense

DoctorofEvil

The top 12 four star attackers in the game are probably AA, Iceman, Hyperion, DV, SW, Magik, SL, stark SM, Wolverine, X-23, GP and CA WW2. Of those, all but Wolvie, SW and CA WW2 are available as 5 stars. It makes 0 sense to say it would break the game if others are released (unless the coders are so lazy they can't scale things properly)

GroundedWisdom

The only reason they have given is that they have no plans of adding any 5*'s that were not previously added at this time.

danielmath

DoctorofEvil wrote: »

The top 12 four star attackers in the game are probably AA, Iceman, Hyperion, DV, SW, Magik, SL, stark SM, Wolverine, X-23, GP and CA WW2. Of those, all but Wolvie, SW and CA WW2 are available as 5 stars. It makes 0 sense to say it would break the game if others are released (unless the coders are so lazy they can't scale things properly)

I do think a 4/55 wolvie would break the game. He would make stuff like AQ and questing irrelevant because he would basically be invulnerable.

TheBaldAvenger

danielmath wrote: »

DoctorofEvil wrote: »

The top 12 four star attackers in the game are probably AA, Iceman, Hyperion, DV, SW, Magik, SL, stark SM, Wolverine, X-23, GP and CA WW2. Of those, all but Wolvie, SW and CA WW2 are available as 5 stars. It makes 0 sense to say it would break the game if others are released (unless the coders are so lazy they can't scale things properly)

I do think a 4/55 wolvie would break the game. He would make stuff like AQ and questing irrelevant because he would basically be invulnerable.

Can't wait to see what the 6* champs are that get added are then. If we can't have 5* versions of some of the most loved champs in the contest for fear of them breaking the game, I shudder to think of what rubbish we will get as 6* champs.

Monk1

DoctorofEvil wrote: »

The top 12 four star attackers in the game are probably AA, Iceman, Hyperion, DV, SW, Magik, SL, stark SM, Wolverine, X-23, GP and CA WW2. Of those, all but Wolvie, SW and CA WW2 are available as 5 stars. It makes 0 sense to say it would break the game if others are released (unless the coders are so lazy they can't scale things properly)

That is an opinion... cap2 is useless at top level as hits like a girl and SW is outdated. Hulk is a monster even in 4* version and Thor is actually easier to use post nerf and armour breaks last ages.

I would like everything at 5* including Red Deadpool, but The range of options is pretty good. Guily for example does everything wolverine can, hits hard can reverse eegen and gain health back, albeit more random

Praaks14

Dr. Strange should be 5* and a 6*