Best 5 star

After adding new ones

Comments

Add a "None of the above" option. Guillotine is better than all of those, IMO, and I'm sure others have different opinions as well.

JSnook

Where is Star Lord? He's OP according to another thread. Shouldn't even be a poll really.

Riegel

I'd say Magik is the absolute best 5* currently and most likely will be for a long time.
Mystic, high prestige, amazing defense, amazing on attack. IMO she's leagues above SL.
Out of your list tho prolly Hulk.

Hulksmasshh

Think OP forgot to say 'Best Science 5 Star'. In which case I would say Hulk followed by Captain America.

AgentOfSHIELD

Once Voodoo goes in it's him

CapWW2

Magik lmao, the best 5 star is SL, highest damage output. hyperion and voodoo are almost right there with SL. Magik will be useless without MD.

Regarding to your poll the best science 5 star will be Hulk. My 4 star has done 14000 damage with the clap sp2. #scary

spumington

Magik is amazing with or without MD. Complete power control, and she can recover damage with limbo. She can also deal damage that cannot be countered. She's great.

GroundedWisdom

spumington wrote: »

Magik is amazing with or without MD. Complete power control, and she can recover damage with limbo. She can also deal damage that cannot be countered. She's great.

I have a theory that Energy Resistance and Serum Science can counter some of it. I haven't invested in maxing them yet to test it.

DNA3000

CapWW2 wrote: »

Magik lmao, the best 5 star is SL, highest damage output. hyperion and voodoo are almost right there with SL. Magik will be useless without MD.

Mystic dispersion is a great addition to Magik as a defender. Its an optional extra on Magik as an attacker. What's more, Magik is useful right out of the box. Starlord has to be awakened to be worth anything. That's a consideration for many players drawing 5* champions.

Riegel

CapWW2 wrote: »

Magik lmao, the best 5 star is SL, highest damage output. hyperion and voodoo are almost right there with SL. Magik will be useless without MD.

Regarding to your poll the best science 5 star will be Hulk. My 4 star has done 14000 damage with the clap sp2. #scary

Looks like people are agreeing with magik. Seems SL actually is a one trick pony and is only great for long fights like LoL. He's a good champ, but there are many that are better. Hmmmmmm. Thinking.

GarbagePanda

IP isn't an option? He's god tier cmon now.

No_More_Heroes

To me, Hulk is the best of that group. Unfortunately though, it's going to be a long time before you could max sig him so...he won't be as effective as his 4* counterpart at sig 99.

LeNoirFaineant

Riegel wrote: »

CapWW2 wrote: »

Magik lmao, the best 5 star is SL, highest damage output. hyperion and voodoo are almost right there with SL. Magik will be useless without MD.

Regarding to your poll the best science 5 star will be Hulk. My 4 star has done 14000 damage with the clap sp2. #scary

Looks like people are agreeing with magik. Seems SL actually is a one trick pony and is only great for long fights like LoL. He's a good champ, but there are many that are better. Hmmmmmm. Thinking.

Agree 100%. Obviously CapWW2 rates SL way too high. May explain his absurd nerf SL post.

C0atHang3r

Sorry , not to go too off topic here, but He's fishing for rank down tickets

DNA3000

Riegel wrote: »

Looks like people are agreeing with magik. Seems SL actually is a one trick pony and is only great for long fights like LoL. He's a good champ, but there are many that are better. Hmmmmmm. Thinking.

In my opinion Star Lord is explicitly good in LoL because most of those fights are purely about landing enough damage before you inevitably die. Since LoL isn't going to let you fight a sustainable fight (as far as I know), nothing matters but damage.

Outside of LoL, other factors matter. Power control is extremely strong for dealing with long fights where the point is to outlast the enemy. Long before Dave's came around my top two attackers in general were Magik and Wolverine because for opposite reasons they were my best attackers for dealing with hard fights. Wolverine could sustain a long fight indefinitely if I could just not get hit too often, and Magik could essentially eliminate the need to deal with specials, meaning anything I could evade the standard attacks and ignore especially special 3 from became a lot easier to fight.

That's not to say Starlord is bad outside of LoL, just that he's not the Alpha and Omega of the game outside of LoL. I would rate Voodoo higher than SL outside of LoL. I would rate Hyperion and Magik more useful in more situations than SL.

Riegel

DNA3000 wrote: »

Riegel wrote: »

Looks like people are agreeing with magik. Seems SL actually is a one trick pony and is only great for long fights like LoL. He's a good champ, but there are many that are better. Hmmmmmm. Thinking.

In my opinion Star Lord is explicitly good in LoL because most of those fights are purely about landing enough damage before you inevitably die. Since LoL isn't going to let you fight a sustainable fight (as far as I know), nothing matters but damage.

Outside of LoL, other factors matter. Power control is extremely strong for dealing with long fights where the point is to outlast the enemy. Long before Dave's came around my top two attackers in general were Magik and Wolverine because for opposite reasons they were my best attackers for dealing with hard fights. Wolverine could sustain a long fight indefinitely if I could just not get hit too often, and Magik could essentially eliminate the need to deal with specials, meaning anything I could evade the standard attacks and ignore especially special 3 from became a lot easier to fight.

That's not to say Starlord is bad outside of LoL, just that he's not the Alpha and Omega of the game outside of LoL. I would rate Voodoo higher than SL outside of LoL. I would rate Hyperion and Magik more useful in more situations than SL.

I don't want to derail this thread, but I agree he's a good champ and great for LoL, but there are many better overall champs. However, CapWW2 is calling for a nerf to SL simply due to LoL in his thread, and spreading it here and other threads. You can check out his thread to see his reasoning which blows my mind. IMO SL doesn't need a nerf, a simpler solution for his issue would be to lower the max damage cap in LoL which I still feel is unneeded.

DNA3000

Riegel wrote: »

I don't want to derail this thread, but I agree he's a good champ and great for LoL, but there are many better overall champs. However, CapWW2 is calling for a nerf to SL simply due to LoL in his thread, and spreading it here and other threads. You can check out his thread to see his reasoning which blows my mind. IMO SL doesn't need a nerf, a simpler solution for his issue would be to lower the max damage cap in LoL which I still feel is unneeded.

I'm aware of that. I'm not worried about that too much because a) the devs already rebalanced Starlord in 12.0, b) game devs tend to be cautious about hitting the same character twice too quickly, and c) despite the fear most players have about calls for nerfs, I know from experience game devs don't nerf champions just because players complain about them. It can sometimes call attention to something, but that just starts the same process of analysis they would do anyway. And since Starlord's damage isn't something they could suddenly become aware of because of a forum post today, it is not a specific concern of mine.

For the record, I do not believe StarLord's performance currently warrants a nerf.

DoctorAntMan

I know my name is bout Ant-Man but once my four star version was duped I beat Thanos easily.

stnkpkl

how do I utilize all of my mystical mastery cores?