Everyone keeps saying how they don't feel bad for allies that placed dupes. It's the name of the game. Kabam made a broken tactic and has been putting sticks to stop a river. Just because allies took advantage of it doesn't mean they deserve to lose. We had full diversity till the 2nd and 3rd war, after facing all tactic defenders. So we jumped on the bandwagon to see if it made a diff. It did. Kudos to us for playing smart. Losing this war is because of a Kabam mistake.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity. Yeah I don’t believe that. We played 4loki, full diversity, and several others. Either way you’re most likely going to get credit for the W. And shouldn’t have gotten the loss.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. This sounds like “ I play tier 1 I am better than you guys” . Do realise tier one alliances make up less than one percent of the entire alliances in the game. These alliances while you make not call them as competitive as tier one still try to compete so telling them they knew the risk is very insensitive.Foregoing diversity is a strategy which is within the rules . Remember the diversity points is only there so alliance are forced to use up resources to rank up champs is you really try to look under the hood from a Kabam business standpoint . Like said earlier , the season wasnt cancelled with the previous fiasco this won’t make a difference .It is a war season that has lost all validity but from the powers that be even your time is not a resource. So just claim the loyalty and revives as compensation and keep your wallets closed .
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity. Yeah I don’t believe that. We played 4loki, full diversity, and several others. Either way you’re most likely going to get credit for the W. And shouldn’t have gotten the loss. Again, Its nice you tell us how the world looks like in the top 20. Tier 1 goes all the way down to P1. Why should I lie? Come down to earth and face the issues the major alliance base was facing instead of telling everyone how great the top 20 are to be not forced using 2 bullseye & co.
Alliances with new members that can’t place defenders have pretty much lost the war before it even started with the new diversity points system. Something is broken yet they add a new rule to break it even more.
We just lost AW solely on Diversity. Last time my alliance stopped playing AW was the last time this diversity rule was made. Now we’re seriously going backwards? Defense by Spread Sheet? Unbelievable
Match making really makes this new diversity points system the worst ever. We only have 28 members but we have been matched with opponents with 30 in the past 3 wars. For this war our opponent has max 150 diversity, so they are in the lead with 2700points already. If it was the old system it would be 300pts, which is not hard to make up for in the attack phase.
In the previous scoring system you guys could place a full map of tactic baron amd bullseye with other annoying defenders like onslaught. There was a message in advance making it known that diversity changes would come live last friday. Alliance war was also intended to include diversity as a factor to prevent the same defenders from being placed. Those who lost last war certainly made others lose that had full diversity and didn’t give those victories a second thought, so this change is as fair as it gets.
Still no official word from kabam? I get the holiday weeekend bit to an extent but you’d think there would be a comment by now right?
Still no official word from kabam? I get the holiday weeekend bit to an extent but you’d think there would be a comment by now right? Dude, at the time of me writing this it's 7:40 AM in BC. They haven't even started their day yet.
Still no official word from kabam? I get the holiday weeekend bit to an extent but you’d think there would be a comment by now right? Dude, at the time of me writing this it's 7:40 AM in BC. They haven't even started their day yet. There have been other issues in the past where someone has chimed in to at least give a hint that something would be done. With the supposed patch on Wed, its most likely they won't do anything.They just need to do better.
We are aware of the issue. The team is currently discussing their plan of action.We'll report back when we have more information. Thank you for your patience.
We are aware of the issue. The team is currently discussing their plan of action.We'll report back when we have more information. Thank you for your patience. Mostly at this point considering a cancellation of the season.
Should be easy enough to adjust running-season Points Total. For every alliance, no matter of win/loss error or not.Diversity Points adjustment for that “early applied” points rule change should be simple.As for individual War Rewards, could probably reward the Win (difference) to those affected that lost when they should have won.ALSO, the extra “Win Points” toward your Season Total could probably be given for those loss-affected alliances.(probably WON'T take back the individual Win rewards from their opponents that should have had the loss).Lastly, as for WAR TIER / WAR RATING adjustment putting you in wrong multiplier next war. Probably NOT gonna be adjusted (we should have faced someone else instead, etc, etc).War Raring # might be able to be corrected from a Win / Loss error, but probably would only apply for wars going forward (not re-doing previous wars this past week).