Wow so aw which was kind of annoying but ok is now ruined ? People loosing wars when they really shouldnt i mean my alli has lost its last two wars evem thou we beat them on everything they only won due to diversity which sucks
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity. Yeah I don’t believe that. We played 4loki, full diversity, and several others. Either way you’re most likely going to get credit for the W. And shouldn’t have gotten the loss. Again, Its nice you tell us how the world looks like in the top 20. Tier 1 goes all the way down to P1. Why should I lie? Come down to earth and face the issues the major alliance base was facing instead of telling everyone how great the top 20 are to be not forced using 2 bullseye & co. How were you forced to use 2 bullseyes? You weren’t forced to place dupes. It was a choice. The tactic has been awful. Some alliances decided to CHOOSE to take advantage of a broken tactic by placing dupes. Good for you guys. You weren’t forced. Nowhere close. Anyways, hope you get your win back.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity. Yeah I don’t believe that. We played 4loki, full diversity, and several others. Either way you’re most likely going to get credit for the W. And shouldn’t have gotten the loss. Again, Its nice you tell us how the world looks like in the top 20. Tier 1 goes all the way down to P1. Why should I lie? Come down to earth and face the issues the major alliance base was facing instead of telling everyone how great the top 20 are to be not forced using 2 bullseye & co.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity. Yeah I don’t believe that. We played 4loki, full diversity, and several others. Either way you’re most likely going to get credit for the W. And shouldn’t have gotten the loss.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail
We are aware of the issue. The team is currently discussing their plan of action.We'll report back when we have more information. Thank you for your patience.
Outstanding kabam performance again… who was smart enough took the risk and placed doubled bullseye & co knowing it will bring more than a kill. Not to bother others but to survive the kill competition! AW was anyways the game mode with the lowest fun level the last seasons -> from flagship to pain in the ass. The change kabam is implementing was not necessary mid season and for sure not in front of a holiday weekend with additional workload for all alliances (updating defense) and without support from their end. Management wise its just a complete fail As I’ve stated you guys who did place lack of diversity did get shafted. But let’s not act like it was some heroic genius or big risk. If you placed lack of diversity from tier 1 and below (even some in tier 1) you took advantage of an extremely broken tactic. It’s not some big brain move or some big risk. Again, you don’t deserve the L due to Kabam’s mistake. But it’s really not the risk you were making it out to be because diversity points didnt matter with a tactic that’s so messed up. As I described it was necessary to compete! Not saying its fun or you need to have studied to do so. But who was not smart enough to double defenders lost the war. As a tier 1 players a few spots out of Masters, it wasn’t necessary to compete. Most in Masters didn’t do it. I see you want to make your point. Its ok for me, we play Tier 1 too and had not a single opponent w 150 diversity. Yeah I don’t believe that. We played 4loki, full diversity, and several others. Either way you’re most likely going to get credit for the W. And shouldn’t have gotten the loss. Again, Its nice you tell us how the world looks like in the top 20. Tier 1 goes all the way down to P1. Why should I lie? Come down to earth and face the issues the major alliance base was facing instead of telling everyone how great the top 20 are to be not forced using 2 bullseye & co. How were you forced to use 2 bullseyes? You weren’t forced to place dupes. It was a choice. The tactic has been awful. Some alliances decided to CHOOSE to take advantage of a broken tactic by placing dupes. Good for you guys. You weren’t forced. Nowhere close. Anyways, hope you get your win back. Listen, its multiple time explained already. I have no time to explain over and over again the ABC of competition to someone who is resistent to acknowledge 😅. Let’s close this here
Why is defender diversity 0 now. We were punished last war with some dupes and lost that war. This war changed diversity to have 0 dupes and opponent has multiple. Diversity points are now 0. So we have no dupes they have multiple and get no penalty. Got screwed in both instances.is this for everyone?
LOL, they should have canceled the season last Wednesday, timing was good for having a checkpoint.Now the war is in even worse status, they have to rollback even if they want to stop the season.
LOL, they should have canceled the season last Wednesday, timing was good for having a checkpoint.Now the war is in even worse status, they have to rollback even if they want to stop the season. Agreed they probably should have ended it last Wednesday but they can't just invalidate 3 wars alliances have fought now either. I can't wait to see how they try to dig out of this one.
LOL, they should have canceled the season last Wednesday, timing was good for having a checkpoint.Now the war is in even worse status, they have to rollback even if they want to stop the season. Agreed they probably should have ended it last Wednesday but they can't just invalidate 3 wars alliances have fought now either. I can't wait to see how they try to dig out of this one. Revising result of war-7 is going to be way more complex, it is totally unfixable now. Not my problem, defintely not the first time Kabam shot themselves in the foot because of stubborn.
LOL, they should have canceled the season last Wednesday, timing was good for having a checkpoint.Now the war is in even worse status, they have to rollback even if they want to stop the season. Agreed they probably should have ended it last Wednesday but they can't just invalidate 3 wars alliances have fought now either. I can't wait to see how they try to dig out of this one. Revising result of war-7 is going to be way more complex, it is totally unfixable now. Not my problem, defintely not the first time Kabam shot themselves in the foot because of stubborn. Yeah. I just hope they take ownership and we get an apology with a plan of action for future metas. More testing, and more of an openness towards players comments. The fact that they nerfed this tactic TWICE shows it probably shouldn’t have been rolled out. Aw is such a headache this season and we may all go crazy if they just don’t cancel today. Really hope they do. Give yourselves more time and give us a break from a game mode that has been extremely taxing this season
Over 24hrs since the ‘we’re aware of the issue’ post and we’re still in the dark, which is disappointing. It doesn’t take a huge leap of imagination to reach the conclusion that this season is toast. Even if they were to decide for some bizarre reason to keep it going, how could they possibly recompense for all the item use there’s been? It’s a dead dog. Let it go and bury it.
Well, it’s very simple really. Like many, we lost a war that we would have won but for the diversity mess up. And in the process of doing so spent loads of resources. It’s not that hard, is it? In addition to which, my comment related to the multiple issues with this season and not just the latest problem. They’re all ‘legit issues’.
‘Yeah all legit issues, specially the one with the 24 hr, when it was still easter holiday and they just got back to the office today.’Oh dear. No, they didn’t get back to the office today. They didn’t reply on Friday when it all hit the fan, or over the weekend, because it was Easter - no problem. They responded yesterday to say they were aware and it was being looked into. Why? Because they were back in yesterday. My point was it was disappointing that 24 hrs after they were back in, and sent their response, we still hadn’t heard anything. I’m afraid I can’t use fewer syllables to explain it.
I love how people are claiming they lost because of diversity like it was in a vacuum and the lack of diversity in defenders didn't have any influence on anything else. You do realize that if you didn't have 30 killmonger, bullseye, adam warlock, and serpents that the opponent wouldn't have necessarily still lost 200 attack bonuses.
Lol, I find out things about my job on the weekend. I won't take care of them until I get back on monday.They weren't back in.
There’s no fix for stupid, evidently.