This is what we are scrapping. A fair and square win where we had A- less deaths and B-better diversity. The change had ZERO affect on our war(along with many others I’ve seen) yet the genius solution is to scrap it entirely. Pathetic. Scrapping an entire war absolutely destroys the entire season integrity and legitimacy. Not only is the compensation garbage, it doesn’t take into account the time, items, boosts, and effort required to win wars. 99% of the community is outraged, the other 1% is alliances like 4loki that benefit from a loss being taken away. I truly don’t understand how this decision was given the thumbs up and hope it’s fixed.
This is what we are scrapping. A fair and square win where we had A- less deaths and B-better diversity. The change had ZERO affect on our war(along with many others I’ve seen) yet the genius solution is to scrap it entirely. Pathetic. Scrapping an entire war absolutely destroys the entire season integrity and legitimacy. Not only is the compensation garbage, it doesn’t take into account the time, items, boosts, and effort required to win wars. 99% of the community is outraged, the other 1% is alliances like 4loki that benefit from a loss being taken away. I truly don’t understand how this decision was given the thumbs up and hope it’s fixed. The words "integrity and legitimacy" couldn't be used to describe this season even before scrapping war 7. What about the fact that summoners couldn't place defenders for 3 wars? And the matchmaking failing multiple wars?
I’m pretty certain Tier 1 doesn’t place anything other than full diversity, if anyone does this they are at a disadvantage Please consider making changes for tier 2 and below. If anyone in tier 1 had less diversity in that war it can be fixed manually, it couldn’t have happened in more than 1-2 alliances, you don’t see incomplete diversity in tier 1 Almost 50 Alliances are in Tier1. Not just the top 10 Alliance. Many of them had incomplete diversity and they all suffered.
I’m pretty certain Tier 1 doesn’t place anything other than full diversity, if anyone does this they are at a disadvantage Please consider making changes for tier 2 and below. If anyone in tier 1 had less diversity in that war it can be fixed manually, it couldn’t have happened in more than 1-2 alliances, you don’t see incomplete diversity in tier 1
I’m pretty certain Tier 1 doesn’t place anything other than full diversity, if anyone does this they are at a disadvantage Please consider making changes for tier 2 and below. If anyone in tier 1 had less diversity in that war it can be fixed manually, it couldn’t have happened in more than 1-2 alliances, you don’t see incomplete diversity in tier 1 Almost 50 Alliances are in Tier1. Not just the top 10 Alliance. Many of them had incomplete diversity and they all suffered. Do you understand that if you are in tier 1 and not placing full diversity you DESERVE to lose.
Adding this here, from this main thread.Due to the issue with Diversity scoring during War #7, this war will not count towards the season scoring.Considering this issue, added to the messy season thus far, the compensation will be as follows:General compensation for everyone that participated in S48 - A full season's worth of victory rewards at 3 Battlegroups regardless of how many BGs they ran That's pretty trash ngl.Diversity should never have been an issue, Just alliances CHOOSING to exploit a rough tactic and dupe the hardest defenders, first time in a very long time points have had to be adjusted just punish this and yet you're giving them a free pass?How about sorting the off season war that screwed up half of all allainces war rating 2 months ago? Never bothered to do anything there and yet my allaince in particular got pushed back a tier for all of off season and first war but you couldn't be bothered to fix that.
Adding this here, from this main thread.Due to the issue with Diversity scoring during War #7, this war will not count towards the season scoring.Considering this issue, added to the messy season thus far, the compensation will be as follows:General compensation for everyone that participated in S48 - A full season's worth of victory rewards at 3 Battlegroups regardless of how many BGs they ran
@Kabam anyone?!The compensation agreed sounds great in principle, has there been any consideration for the rewards being applied at the multiplier alliances were at at the beginning of the season? Or the end of last season, rather than the current?