Kabam stopped after finding that relics won't bring any revenue.
Should be scraped entirely although obviously not feasible to do so.
I don’t like them and never have.I don’t like strikers,..i think 15 hit combos (or whatever it is), are ridiculous and take away from the fundamentals of how the game was actually played.I don’t use them for ANY game mode except for when they are a requirement such as act 8 and then i unbound them once i explored that.I still have a 6 star 1-2 and 2-3 relic rank up gem sitting in my inventory i haven’t used and have no interest in using.A unnecessary addition to an already complicated game imo.May get some hate from the “relic lovers”,..but that’s okay, everyone’s entitled to their own opinion.
I don’t like them and never have.I don’t like strikers,..i think 15 hit combos (or whatever it is), are ridiculous and take away from the fundamentals of how the game was actually played.I don’t use them for ANY game mode except for when they are a requirement such as act 8 and then i unbound them once i explored that.I still have a 6 star 1-2 and 2-3 relic rank up gem sitting in my inventory i haven’t used and have no interest in using.A unnecessary addition to an already complicated game imo.May get some hate from the “relic lovers”,..but that’s okay, everyone’s entitled to their own opinion. They’re incredibly useful for a lot of champ rotations. They don’t break any fundamentals and are well balanced. I’m hating on this take because it’s straight up ignorant and if you’re just ignoring your relics, you’re missing out on an advantage, especially the ones that pair excellently with certain champs. Relics literally doubled the usage of champs like Venom and Black Cat
I don’t like them and never have.I don’t like strikers,..i think 15 hit combos (or whatever it is), are ridiculous and take away from the fundamentals of how the game was actually played.I don’t use them for ANY game mode except for when they are a requirement such as act 8 and then i unbound them once i explored that.I still have a 6 star 1-2 and 2-3 relic rank up gem sitting in my inventory i haven’t used and have no interest in using.A unnecessary addition to an already complicated game imo.May get some hate from the “relic lovers”,..but that’s okay, everyone’s entitled to their own opinion. They’re incredibly useful for a lot of champ rotations. They don’t break any fundamentals and are well balanced. I’m hating on this take because it’s straight up ignorant and if you’re just ignoring your relics, you’re missing out on an advantage, especially the ones that pair excellently with certain champs. Relics literally doubled the usage of champs like Venom and Black Cat Well I appreciated your comment until you said my viewpoint was straight up ignorant lol.Look i don’t like relics or the mechanics of them, and i have not found that it is diminishing my game play by not having them equipped.I also have a r2 7 star Venom and he is very much worth that rank up with or without the relic …imo.I don’t think it’s ignorant to dislike something within a game and to have a viewpoint on that.I don’t like relics,..and i don’t think it’s made a great impact on the game or even made it that much better.But again,..that is just my opinion …and you are more than entitled to your own.
I don’t like them and never have.I don’t like strikers,..i think 15 hit combos (or whatever it is), are ridiculous and take away from the fundamentals of how the game was actually played.I don’t use them for ANY game mode except for when they are a requirement such as act 8 and then i unbound them once i explored that.I still have a 6 star 1-2 and 2-3 relic rank up gem sitting in my inventory i haven’t used and have no interest in using.A unnecessary addition to an already complicated game imo.May get some hate from the “relic lovers”,..but that’s okay, everyone’s entitled to their own opinion. They’re incredibly useful for a lot of champ rotations. They don’t break any fundamentals and are well balanced. I’m hating on this take because it’s straight up ignorant and if you’re just ignoring your relics, you’re missing out on an advantage, especially the ones that pair excellently with certain champs. Relics literally doubled the usage of champs like Venom and Black Cat Well I appreciated your comment until you said my viewpoint was straight up ignorant lol.Look i don’t like relics or the mechanics of them, and i have not found that it is diminishing my game play by not having them equipped.I also have a r2 7 star Venom and he is very much worth that rank up with or without the relic …imo.I don’t think it’s ignorant to dislike something within a game and to have a viewpoint on that.I don’t like relics,..and i don’t think it’s made a great impact on the game or even made it that much better.But again,..that is just my opinion …and you are more than entitled to your own. I said it was ignorant because you seem to be ignoring how much better champs can be. Strikers not only act as a combo extender, but the stun can’t be ignored by any node or champ. It’s incredibly useful in a pinch in battlegrounds (like using it right after an sp2 with Hulkling to close out matches) and without it you lose a lot of time and damage. Not only does it do that, but it helps weave in a lot of champ rotations. It’s integral to champs like Silk and champs like Onslaught (and others with heavy attack abilities) greatly benefit from the striker stun. Domino can now place a bleed on herself for increased damage, OR can activate death field etc. So yes, there is a big impact that these have made. That’s not even covering how good the gambit relic is for crit, SW can make Kushala’s block regen even better and many more. Venom is good without the relic but the relic makes him much better so I don’t get your point here
How about we just fix the whiff issues with the ones we have first?
How about we just fix the whiff issues with the ones we have first? I forget what the rationale for the relic pause was in the first place. Was it an effort to fix their malfunctioning? Was it being stretched too thin? Dr. Zola