WAR Leaderboard screwed?

2»

Comments

  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    What are those alliances supposed to do? Waste items on a war that doesn’t count? Would be irresponsible and dumb to waste items just to deliberately sabotage your alliance.
    probably do what LVt did? They took it seriously and didnt tank. It seems to was known in higher circles that Leaderboard plays a part in matchmaking. Are you asking for an excuse not to abuse the system?
    also, you can 40% and clear like mostly everyone did.
    Then you’re wasting time planning and playing for nothing, no thanks.
  • pseudosanepseudosane Member, Guardian Posts: 3,978 Guardian

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    What are those alliances supposed to do? Waste items on a war that doesn’t count? Would be irresponsible and dumb to waste items just to deliberately sabotage your alliance.
    probably do what LVt did? They took it seriously and didnt tank. It seems to was known in higher circles that Leaderboard plays a part in matchmaking. Are you asking for an excuse not to abuse the system?
    also, you can 40% and clear like mostly everyone did.
    Then you’re wasting time planning and playing for nothing, no thanks.
    The effect of not clearing was well known. Feigning ignorance isnt helping.
  • 228228 Member Posts: 70

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    This is something that prolly needs to be addressed publicly….as the integrity of AW could very well be seen as compromised due to the actions of those alliances mentioned.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    What are those alliances supposed to do? Waste items on a war that doesn’t count? Would be irresponsible and dumb to waste items just to deliberately sabotage your alliance.
    probably do what LVt did? They took it seriously and didnt tank. It seems to was known in higher circles that Leaderboard plays a part in matchmaking. Are you asking for an excuse not to abuse the system?
    also, you can 40% and clear like mostly everyone did.
    Then you’re wasting time planning and playing for nothing, no thanks.
    Possibly one of the worst justifications I've heard for abusing the system lol.
    You're telling me that folks who are in these top alliances in Masters need to spend so much time to just 40% a war and can't just pick a lane and move? That takes 5 mins to select a lane and a couple minis and just move when free. And playing for nothing? How about the integrity of the season? Which actually it looks like they don't care about.
    Weak excuse, come up with something better.
    The integrity argument would only apply if ALL top alliances tried. If you try and someone doesn’t, you are hurting yourself. No thanks
  • KnightZeroKnightZero Member Posts: 1,450 ★★★★★

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    What are those alliances supposed to do? Waste items on a war that doesn’t count? Would be irresponsible and dumb to waste items just to deliberately sabotage your alliance.
    probably do what LVt did? They took it seriously and didnt tank. It seems to was known in higher circles that Leaderboard plays a part in matchmaking. Are you asking for an excuse not to abuse the system?
    also, you can 40% and clear like mostly everyone did.
    Then you’re wasting time planning and playing for nothing, no thanks.
    Possibly one of the worst justifications I've heard for abusing the system lol.
    You're telling me that folks who are in these top alliances in Masters need to spend so much time to just 40% a war and can't just pick a lane and move? That takes 5 mins to select a lane and a couple minis and just move when free. And playing for nothing? How about the integrity of the season? Which actually it looks like they don't care about.
    Weak excuse, come up with something better.
    The integrity argument would only apply if ALL top alliances tried. If you try and someone doesn’t, you are hurting yourself. No thanks
    Ah. So since other top alliances are abusing matchmaking and messing up the season for lower alliances, it's fair.
    Good to know that integrity is just lacking amongst you folks.
    There were many top alliances who didn't abuse the system fyi.

    Try and come up with a better argument lol.
  • pseudosanepseudosane Member, Guardian Posts: 3,978 Guardian

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    What are those alliances supposed to do? Waste items on a war that doesn’t count? Would be irresponsible and dumb to waste items just to deliberately sabotage your alliance.
    probably do what LVt did? They took it seriously and didnt tank. It seems to was known in higher circles that Leaderboard plays a part in matchmaking. Are you asking for an excuse not to abuse the system?
    also, you can 40% and clear like mostly everyone did.
    Then you’re wasting time planning and playing for nothing, no thanks.
    Possibly one of the worst justifications I've heard for abusing the system lol.
    You're telling me that folks who are in these top alliances in Masters need to spend so much time to just 40% a war and can't just pick a lane and move? That takes 5 mins to select a lane and a couple minis and just move when free. And playing for nothing? How about the integrity of the season? Which actually it looks like they don't care about.
    Weak excuse, come up with something better.
    The integrity argument would only apply if ALL top alliances tried. If you try and someone doesn’t, you are hurting yourself. No thanks
    Yeah lol. It is ok to cheat if others do it. Good to know.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    What are those alliances supposed to do? Waste items on a war that doesn’t count? Would be irresponsible and dumb to waste items just to deliberately sabotage your alliance.
    probably do what LVt did? They took it seriously and didnt tank. It seems to was known in higher circles that Leaderboard plays a part in matchmaking. Are you asking for an excuse not to abuse the system?
    also, you can 40% and clear like mostly everyone did.
    Then you’re wasting time planning and playing for nothing, no thanks.
    Possibly one of the worst justifications I've heard for abusing the system lol.
    You're telling me that folks who are in these top alliances in Masters need to spend so much time to just 40% a war and can't just pick a lane and move? That takes 5 mins to select a lane and a couple minis and just move when free. And playing for nothing? How about the integrity of the season? Which actually it looks like they don't care about.
    Weak excuse, come up with something better.
    The integrity argument would only apply if ALL top alliances tried. If you try and someone doesn’t, you are hurting yourself. No thanks
    Yeah lol. It is ok to cheat if others do it. Good to know.
    Not playing a war that doesn’t count is cheating? That’s pretty hilarious
  • KnightZeroKnightZero Member Posts: 1,450 ★★★★★

    Let us call it what it is.
    Masters alliances, including CCP alliances like DSVG/SSX/4LOki, among others like XK9, GT40, are abusing the system to get easier wins for masters. Unintended or not, this is abuse.

    What are those alliances supposed to do? Waste items on a war that doesn’t count? Would be irresponsible and dumb to waste items just to deliberately sabotage your alliance.
    probably do what LVt did? They took it seriously and didnt tank. It seems to was known in higher circles that Leaderboard plays a part in matchmaking. Are you asking for an excuse not to abuse the system?
    also, you can 40% and clear like mostly everyone did.
    Then you’re wasting time planning and playing for nothing, no thanks.
    Possibly one of the worst justifications I've heard for abusing the system lol.
    You're telling me that folks who are in these top alliances in Masters need to spend so much time to just 40% a war and can't just pick a lane and move? That takes 5 mins to select a lane and a couple minis and just move when free. And playing for nothing? How about the integrity of the season? Which actually it looks like they don't care about.
    Weak excuse, come up with something better.
    The integrity argument would only apply if ALL top alliances tried. If you try and someone doesn’t, you are hurting yourself. No thanks
    Yeah lol. It is ok to cheat if others do it. Good to know.
    Not playing a war that doesn’t count is cheating? That’s pretty hilarious
    When you knowingly do it to abuse matchmaking, and then say that integrity is only if all alliances tried, it's akin to cheating. What makes you different from someone who mods and says that it's just cuz others are also there who do it?
  • BeeweeBeewee Member Posts: 556 ★★★★
    Personally the situation couldve been handled better. Daniel is right though. Its a waste to plan when you know war wont count on the other hand its not right for alliances to tank. In other words this is just an example or poor matchmaking and if this situation wanted to be avoided. They shouldnt have told players it wouldnt count till after the war itself ended.
  • DarthMysticDarthMystic Member Posts: 79
    If nothing else this whole situation has brought to light how broken the matchmaking system is outside what I'd call "happy path". It works fine to match based on the leader board if everyone is trying their hardest and scoring optimal points for a win or loss. That doesn't work when you discount an entire war and don't even bother with an in game message about it.

    Maybe we can also stop seeing the posts telling people war matchmaking is based on war rating. I mean it is in that happy path scenario but obviously a more accurate description is it's heavily weighted on the leader board.

    This situation just results in a whole lot more alliances getting to experience the joy of playing war on the tier 1 map with a tier 2 multiplier than just the ones on the bubble.
  • RebarkRebark Member Posts: 406 ★★★
    Nowhere does it say that we are obligated to play all the wars.
    We just knew that the war wouldn't count and we didn't feel like playing. That's all.
    I still don't understand what the issue is.
  • KnightZeroKnightZero Member Posts: 1,450 ★★★★★
    Rebark said:

    Nowhere does it say that we are obligated to play all the wars.
    We just knew that the war wouldn't count and we didn't feel like playing. That's all.
    I still don't understand what the issue is.

    The issue is the fact that alliances like yours have the chance to match weaker alliances and ruin their season.
    Doing this and getting a matchup we'll below yours might be fine for you, but the opposing alliance if they're in T2 gets pretty much an immediate loss and that too with a T2 Multiplier, affecting their season.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    Rebark said:

    Nowhere does it say that we are obligated to play all the wars.
    We just knew that the war wouldn't count and we didn't feel like playing. That's all.
    I still don't understand what the issue is.

    The issue is the fact that alliances like yours have the chance to match weaker alliances and ruin their season.
    Doing this and getting a matchup we'll below yours might be fine for you, but the opposing alliance if they're in T2 gets pretty much an immediate loss and that too with a T2 Multiplier, affecting their season.
    How do you feel about alliances who take seasons off war? When 4loki or ssx or whoever skips a season, drops a ton in rating and automatically get 6 or so free wins the following season?
  • KnightZeroKnightZero Member Posts: 1,450 ★★★★★

    Rebark said:

    Nowhere does it say that we are obligated to play all the wars.
    We just knew that the war wouldn't count and we didn't feel like playing. That's all.
    I still don't understand what the issue is.

    The issue is the fact that alliances like yours have the chance to match weaker alliances and ruin their season.
    Doing this and getting a matchup we'll below yours might be fine for you, but the opposing alliance if they're in T2 gets pretty much an immediate loss and that too with a T2 Multiplier, affecting their season.
    How do you feel about alliances who take seasons off war? When 4loki or ssx or whoever skips a season, drops a ton in rating and automatically get 6 or so free wins the following season?
    There's a difference between that and this which either you know, but are trying to twist the situation around or just have zero clue of what you're saying.

    If they take a break, they get lesser rewards for a season, and even when pushing the next season, they get lesser rewards. All while facing alliances at a T2 MULTIPLIER. Note that both alliances then have a T2 Multiplier

    In this situation, the alliance, faces a weaker alliance who has a T2 Multiplier all while the top alliance has a T1 Multiplier.
    So this gives them an added boost in the Masters race, while hurting the weaker alliance who gets no benefit from this.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    Rebark said:

    Nowhere does it say that we are obligated to play all the wars.
    We just knew that the war wouldn't count and we didn't feel like playing. That's all.
    I still don't understand what the issue is.

    The issue is the fact that alliances like yours have the chance to match weaker alliances and ruin their season.
    Doing this and getting a matchup we'll below yours might be fine for you, but the opposing alliance if they're in T2 gets pretty much an immediate loss and that too with a T2 Multiplier, affecting their season.
    How do you feel about alliances who take seasons off war? When 4loki or ssx or whoever skips a season, drops a ton in rating and automatically get 6 or so free wins the following season?
    There's a difference between that and this which either you know, but are trying to twist the situation around or just have zero clue of what you're saying.

    If they take a break, they get lesser rewards for a season, and even when pushing the next season, they get lesser rewards. All while facing alliances at a T2 MULTIPLIER. Note that both alliances then have a T2 Multiplier

    In this situation, the alliance, faces a weaker alliance who has a T2 Multiplier all while the top alliance has a T1 Multiplier.
    So this gives them an added boost in the Masters race, while hurting the weaker alliance who gets no benefit from this.
    This is the opposite of what happens. The big benefit to tanking a season is that next season becomes WAY easier to get podium, because you get around 5-6 free wins. This hurts those weaker alliances because they are essentially facing a top 5-10 alliance in war 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 because of lower war rating. Obviously kabam should just not count the points when these wars get canceled, and it’s not the alliances responsibility to police it. Every alliance should do what is in their own best interest as long as it’s within the rules.
  • Herbal_TaxmanHerbal_Taxman Member Posts: 662 ★★★
    Way too much focus on the choices of a few alliances, not enough attention on the fact that Kabam underestimated the impact of their test, didn’t have any process to mitigate the issue with AW and didn’t communicate effectively when they had the chance. 95% of the blame should be assigned to Kabam…
  • Dab_westDab_west Member Posts: 178 ★★
    womp womp
  • BloodyCrueltyBloodyCruelty Member Posts: 191 ★★

  • BloodyCrueltyBloodyCruelty Member Posts: 191 ★★
    edited November 4
    He explains it very well. This season is worth nothing. P1 alliances chilling in Top 10 because they played the 4th war and masters alliances chilling deep in P1 because they didn'tplay 4th war. There are masters alliances that can reach top 10 or even 1-3 without playing against a single masters alliance. This is a joke. If nefti loses one war then Chaos alliance will be #1 automatically without playing against a masters alliance. Ridiculous.
  • BloodyCrueltyBloodyCruelty Member Posts: 191 ★★
    edited November 4
    We are happy about alliances that will reach top 1-10 while playing against P1 alliances only. The Top alliances doesn't even have the chance to defend their titles because they won't match the abusers😂 Good job and thank you Kabam. Thank you for the thousands of units I spent on this season. This comes from a Nefti player. I will quit the game.

    I also thank you in the name of all P1 and P2 alliances that got completely destroyed by masters alliances this season
  • MrSakuragiMrSakuragi Member Posts: 5,244 ★★★★★
    None of those have worked at Kabam for some time
  • BloodyCrueltyBloodyCruelty Member Posts: 191 ★★
    So in conclusion no Kabam worker will read this lol. What a waste of time
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    So in conclusion no Kabam worker will read this lol. What a waste of time

    There’s just nothing that can be done about it. What is your solution?
  • BloodyCrueltyBloodyCruelty Member Posts: 191 ★★
    Cancel the season or lock titles for alliances that didn't play 4th war
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★

    Cancel the season or lock titles for alliances that didn't play 4th war

    Absolutely ridiculous. Punishing someone for not playing a war that didn’t count is beyond idiotic. Even you have to realize that
  • BloodyCrueltyBloodyCruelty Member Posts: 191 ★★
    Cancel the season or don't give away titles. I don't see the punishment lol. Giving someone rewards that they don't deserve us also beyond stupid lol.
  • CHANCEC890710CHANCEC890710 Member Posts: 35

    While I can sympathize with having WR +/- from a War which will NOT count (but won’t be adjusted until later on).
    And Kabam really should implement a routine to be able to actually cancel (as in STOP) a War that is already in progress (and/or better be able to control WR +/- if need be for certain Wars, etc)

    But it seems like everyone is saying that either..

    (A) if they happened to WIN that war, and move up in WR, that the Next War will have a very high chance at LOSING, because they will be matched against a team higher than what they should be matching against.

    or (B) if they had LOST, then they'll get an unfair advantage because the drop in WR will mean they have a very high chance at WINNING the Next War instead.

    But with logic, aren’t you implying that every single normal War during the season is a constant TOGGLING of a Win, then a Loss, then a Win, then a Loss, back and forth, in a very tight narrow range of WR ?

    Because winning 2 in a row, or losing 2 in a row, would be throwing your WR totally out of whack with the opponents you should only be matching with ?

    Absolutely not saying that. If a masters ally can drop to tier 2 by losing and I stay in tier 2 by losing by revive spamming the war is completely different than if they and I both played the war properly and lost
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 12,768 Guardian


    Absolutely not saying that. If a masters ally can drop to tier 2 by losing and I stay in tier 2 by losing by revive spamming the war is completely different than if they and I both played the war properly and lost

    1-2 weeks old comment by now, and the other larger/continuing threads about this have since clarified about Matching based on current points (ranking) from those wins/losses, and not just by WarRating or the win/loss per-se itself. With more examples, charts, etc, from others.

    See that thread by BloodyCruelty to try and keep additional things in one place with the most relevant and detailed info about it (and maybe/hopefully any Kabam response).

    https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/380322/aw-exploit-4th-war#latest
  • Heck33Heck33 Member Posts: 13
    Hey good news.
Sign In or Register to comment.