Kabam Miike wrote: » Vossler77 wrote: » Can we sell 5* again. Its been a request for many summoners @Kabam Miike We have no intention of enabling the Sale of 5-Star Champions again at this time. This might change in the future, but not yet.
Vossler77 wrote: » Can we sell 5* again. Its been a request for many summoners @Kabam Miike
Jaffacaked wrote: » @Kabam Miike when can we get the stats an prestige of these champs at r1
Kabam Miike wrote: » DarkestDestroyer wrote: » @Kabam Miike please can you answer if there are going to be more ways to gain T5 basics?! There will be, but not anything we're ready to discuss quite yet!
DarkestDestroyer wrote: » @Kabam Miike please can you answer if there are going to be more ways to gain T5 basics?!
TeeJayFlash wrote: » Jaffacaked wrote: » @Kabam Miike when can we get the stats an prestige of these champs at r1 kabam doesn't give out prestige numbers
GreenElf21 wrote: » C'Mon Miike... Can you address what I pointed out earlier about Venom missing from this list?
GreenElf21 wrote: » Updated with Picture! GreenElf21 wrote: » C'Mon Miike... Can you address what I pointed out earlier about Venom missing from this list?
Darth_Kaladinn wrote: » GreenElf21 wrote: » Updated with Picture! GreenElf21 wrote: » C'Mon Miike... Can you address what I pointed out earlier about Venom missing from this list? We don’t want Venom!
Kabam Miike wrote: » GreenElf21 wrote: » Updated with Picture! GreenElf21 wrote: » C'Mon Miike... Can you address what I pointed out earlier about Venom missing from this list? As we said when that image was first added, it was not at all indicative of the Champions that would be available. We had no idea who was going to end up in the Crystal at that time.
Holdeng wrote: » Any plans to release a 6* UC to the loyalty store?
DeathBringer77 wrote: » Kabam Miike wrote: » bradshaw1984 wrote: » @Kabam Miike I realise that my hostile tone may discourage you from responding to my comments so in an effort to get some feedback to my larger concerns can I have one question answered please. Does kabam consider customer satisfaction a core value of its business model? Absolutely. We're always working to make sure that Summoners are having a great time in The Contest. Sometimes, we'll announce things that not everybody is going to be over the moon excited about, but we also have to think about the balance of The Contest, and the future. There’s much better ways to balance the contest and future of the game outside of adding 6*’s. Try 90% of the community not liking this. Does that matter? So next year, we should expect 7*’s to ensure the future of the game??? Kabam logic is terrible. You guys need to understand that people have been playing this game for 2+ years and have spent a ton of time and money to get their rosters where they want. Now in order to keep being competitive (AQ, AW, etc), we need to start all over again with 6*’s. Tough justifying why any of your top tier players shouldn’t quit.
Kabam Miike wrote: » bradshaw1984 wrote: » @Kabam Miike I realise that my hostile tone may discourage you from responding to my comments so in an effort to get some feedback to my larger concerns can I have one question answered please. Does kabam consider customer satisfaction a core value of its business model? Absolutely. We're always working to make sure that Summoners are having a great time in The Contest. Sometimes, we'll announce things that not everybody is going to be over the moon excited about, but we also have to think about the balance of The Contest, and the future.
bradshaw1984 wrote: » @Kabam Miike I realise that my hostile tone may discourage you from responding to my comments so in an effort to get some feedback to my larger concerns can I have one question answered please. Does kabam consider customer satisfaction a core value of its business model?
TKal wrote: » Alpha07 wrote: » TKal wrote: » Moises_H wrote: » Really not sure why quite a few people are complaining about the list of champs. This is much better than the original 5* list. There are some really useful champs to be had here Much better than the original 5* that had SL and Magik ? Yeah sure Magik was trash when the 5* crystal was released. the pool consisted of: WS, BP, Rhino, Spiderman, Juggs, Magik, Captain Marvel, Ronan, Iron Man, Star Lord, Storm and Cyclops. at that moment, most of the good champs needed to be duped. WS, Rhino and Magik were TRASH when the crystal was released. The only champs useful in the 6* is Angela. KG might be good, but needs to be duped. None of the others, deserve all the cats needed to be r2, none. That’s trash. Dare tell me that you’ll spend 7 T2A and 3 T5B un any champs on the list
Alpha07 wrote: » TKal wrote: » Moises_H wrote: » Really not sure why quite a few people are complaining about the list of champs. This is much better than the original 5* list. There are some really useful champs to be had here Much better than the original 5* that had SL and Magik ? Yeah sure Magik was trash when the 5* crystal was released. the pool consisted of: WS, BP, Rhino, Spiderman, Juggs, Magik, Captain Marvel, Ronan, Iron Man, Star Lord, Storm and Cyclops. at that moment, most of the good champs needed to be duped. WS, Rhino and Magik were TRASH when the crystal was released.
TKal wrote: » Moises_H wrote: » Really not sure why quite a few people are complaining about the list of champs. This is much better than the original 5* list. There are some really useful champs to be had here Much better than the original 5* that had SL and Magik ? Yeah sure
Moises_H wrote: » Really not sure why quite a few people are complaining about the list of champs. This is much better than the original 5* list. There are some really useful champs to be had here
Brandonius wrote: » 24 champs means such a tiny chance to dupe any of them anytime soon.
DNA3000 wrote: » Brandonius wrote: » 24 champs means such a tiny chance to dupe any of them anytime soon. The odds of duplicating at least one champion from a crystal that contains twenty four different champions is about 50/50 after six pulls.
Alpha07 wrote: » TKal wrote: » Alpha07 wrote: » TKal wrote: » Moises_H wrote: » Really not sure why quite a few people are complaining about the list of champs. This is much better than the original 5* list. There are some really useful champs to be had here Much better than the original 5* that had SL and Magik ? Yeah sure Magik was trash when the 5* crystal was released. the pool consisted of: WS, BP, Rhino, Spiderman, Juggs, Magik, Captain Marvel, Ronan, Iron Man, Star Lord, Storm and Cyclops. at that moment, most of the good champs needed to be duped. WS, Rhino and Magik were TRASH when the crystal was released. The only champs useful in the 6* is Angela. KG might be good, but needs to be duped. None of the others, deserve all the cats needed to be r2, none. That’s trash. Dare tell me that you’ll spend 7 T2A and 3 T5B un any champs on the list WW2 Cap and Angela seem to be the only ones i would dare to invest T5B in, but that's debatable. are you going to tell me YJ, WS, Red Hulk, Luke Cage, Yondu, Nebula are totally useless? tell me a champ from the first 5* pool (not named CM or SL, oh and they needed the dupes to be great) that would you have spent resources on. i mean, 6* pool is not the best, but is far from be the worst imo.