Need the AW percentages back

Haji_SaabHaji_Saab Posts: 5,310 ★★★★★
edited February 2018 in General Discussion
Why did you guys bring the bar back? We had the bar, then you gave us percentages to improve the HUD and we appreciated it and you celebrated our appreciation. And now for some reason, we are back to square one...

Bring back the percentages!

Comments

  • Maximus_SpankersonMaximus_Spankerson Posts: 447 ★★
    what he said
  • ArmyBratArmyBrat Posts: 87
    Agreed. Why are there no more threads on this?
  • Atomic_WolfAtomic_Wolf Posts: 59
    I agree with this. It's difficult to see who's winning when the bars are some close to one another. We need the percentages! It's much harder to read now.
  • Crine60Crine60 Posts: 396 ★★
    Agree.
  • MikeHockMikeHock Posts: 2,190 ★★★★
    Kabam giveth & Kabam taketh away..... for no reason
  • 420sam420sam Posts: 526 ★★★
    Why even change one of the things that people actually like? I thought you guys beta-tested stuff. SMH
  • This seems to be a weird change to me also. I hope it was a dumb version reversion error.
  • Haji_SaabHaji_Saab Posts: 5,310 ★★★★★
    Can we have this back please?
  • xNigxNig Posts: 5,700 ★★★★★
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Or defenders killed.
  • CihagCihag Posts: 279
    I think what most people don‘t understand is that the percentages didn‘t show who was „winning“. They only showed exploration, which still can easily be seen in the „attacker kills” section at the bottom of the points overview. This number is shown for both alliances...

    However, the exploration-% didn’t say anything about who was leading points-wise and thus winning the war...

    So in essence, both, the bar and the percentages, are not required at at all... Yet the bar gives a visual estimate on who has more exploration, so they kept the bar...
  • TheOneAndOnlyTheOneAndOnly Posts: 690 ★★★
    xNig wrote: »
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Or defenders killed.

    Defender kills has no relation to the percentage completion because some alliances do fall multiple times to one defender.
  • CihagCihag Posts: 279
    xNig wrote: »
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Or defenders killed.

    Defender kills has no relation to the percentage completion because some alliances do fall multiple times to one defender.

    I think he means the number of the opponent’s defenders that were killed by our attackers... I believe they are referred to as “attacker kills” in the US version

    (I play the German version, where the translation is awfully wrong sometimes...)
  • CihagCihag Posts: 279
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Defenders remaining is not visible for both alliances...
    (But yeah, simple math does help... 150 - [Attacker kills] = defenders remaining)
  • TheOneAndOnlyTheOneAndOnly Posts: 690 ★★★
    Cihag wrote: »
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Defenders remaining is not visible for both alliances...
    (But yeah, simple math does help... 150 - [Attacker kills] = defenders remaining)

    I thought he would know what I meant (count their defenders remaining plus any portals/nodes not touched), but given your previous post about differences in translation as it relates to attacker kills then that was probably hasty.
Sign In or Register to comment.