Need the AW percentages back

Haji_SaabHaji_Saab Member Posts: 5,837 ★★★★★
edited February 2018 in General Discussion
Why did you guys bring the bar back? We had the bar, then you gave us percentages to improve the HUD and we appreciated it and you celebrated our appreciation. And now for some reason, we are back to square one...

Bring back the percentages!

Comments

  • Maximus_SpankersonMaximus_Spankerson Member Posts: 445 ★★
    what he said
  • ArmyBratArmyBrat Member Posts: 87
    Agreed. Why are there no more threads on this?
  • Atomic_WolfAtomic_Wolf Member Posts: 59
    I agree with this. It's difficult to see who's winning when the bars are some close to one another. We need the percentages! It's much harder to read now.
  • Crine60Crine60 Member Posts: 1,446 ★★★★
    Agree.
  • World EaterWorld Eater Member Posts: 3,783 ★★★★★
    Kabam giveth & Kabam taketh away..... for no reason
  • 420sam420sam Member Posts: 526 ★★★
    Why even change one of the things that people actually like? I thought you guys beta-tested stuff. SMH
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,957 Guardian
    This seems to be a weird change to me also. I hope it was a dumb version reversion error.
  • This content has been removed.
  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,336 ★★★★★
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Or defenders killed.
  • G-Hun-GearG-Hun-Gear Member Posts: 1,447 ★★★★
    I think what most people don‘t understand is that the percentages didn‘t show who was „winning“. They only showed exploration, which still can easily be seen in the „attacker kills” section at the bottom of the points overview. This number is shown for both alliances...

    However, the exploration-% didn’t say anything about who was leading points-wise and thus winning the war...

    So in essence, both, the bar and the percentages, are not required at at all... Yet the bar gives a visual estimate on who has more exploration, so they kept the bar...
  • TheOneAndOnlyTheOneAndOnly Member Posts: 690 ★★★
    xNig wrote: »
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Or defenders killed.

    Defender kills has no relation to the percentage completion because some alliances do fall multiple times to one defender.
  • G-Hun-GearG-Hun-Gear Member Posts: 1,447 ★★★★
    xNig wrote: »
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Or defenders killed.

    Defender kills has no relation to the percentage completion because some alliances do fall multiple times to one defender.

    I think he means the number of the opponent’s defenders that were killed by our attackers... I believe they are referred to as “attacker kills” in the US version

    (I play the German version, where the translation is awfully wrong sometimes...)
  • G-Hun-GearG-Hun-Gear Member Posts: 1,447 ★★★★
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Defenders remaining is not visible for both alliances...
    (But yeah, simple math does help... 150 - [Attacker kills] = defenders remaining)
  • TheOneAndOnlyTheOneAndOnly Member Posts: 690 ★★★
    Cihag wrote: »
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    Can we have this back please?

    You know you can still arrive at the points just by looking at the defenders remaining?

    Defenders remaining is not visible for both alliances...
    (But yeah, simple math does help... 150 - [Attacker kills] = defenders remaining)

    I thought he would know what I meant (count their defenders remaining plus any portals/nodes not touched), but given your previous post about differences in translation as it relates to attacker kills then that was probably hasty.
Sign In or Register to comment.