Better rewards for running a path in LOL after the first run

The first run and last run rewards are of course good and all but what about the other paths in between? can we get better rewards, perhaps a decent amount of five star shards or maybe revives after beating certain nodes

Comments

xNig

Why should that be added?

Did not having it stop anyone from exploring LoL?

Apache

xNig wrote: »

Why should that be added?

Did not having it stop anyone from exploring LoL?

exploring it 100%? I did one run ( and i felt it was worth the reward) and dont see the need to do another lane since the rewards are minimal, i know others have felt the same.

cytwbc

rewards are minimal this cant be serious, yes its hard yes it will cost anyone to finish 100%
how i dont call 5 t4c of each class, 12 t2a. 65k 5* shards, a 5* awakening gem crystal a generic 5* awakening gem. 100 5* sig stone crystals and a 5* ULTRON PRIME minimal

Username819273981

Cytwbc.
I think op is talking about the lol runs in between the 1st & 100% as those aren't minimal. The remaining runs (2nd, 3rd....) absolutely are!

Apache

Stupid4stillplaying wrote: »

Cytwbc.
I think op is talking about the lol runs in between the 1st & 100% as those aren't minimal. The remaining runs (2nd, 3rd....) absolutely are!

yes exactly

cytwbc

What other quest in this game give good rewards for runs between the 1st and last????
cant think of any personally

Also who is gonna run LoL more then once if they dont plan on 100% it?

Apache

cytwbc wrote: »

What other quest in this game give good rewards for runs between the 1st and last????
cant think of any personally

Also who is gonna run LoL more then once if they dont plan on 100% it?

What other quest cost thousands to compete 100%?

Lagmelongtime

A simple suggestion is to spread the rewards for 100% completion into each run. Something like some 5* shards, 1 t2a, some sig stones 1 set (all class) of t4c per run. And then when 100% you get the rest of the rewards. I for one do not want to finish LOL or buy any of these BS t2a shards for a premium price atm, but if I know i am only 1 away to form my 4th t2a for another 4/55 I may just go do that LOL run. Also makes sense from a item limit perspective. Some ppls may have maxed out t4c of a certain class and just can't get another 3 t4c of each class all at the same time knowing that they are useless when expired. Also no need to retrofit rewards for ppls who already completed LOL 100% since it's essentially the same rewards.

Apache

Lagmelongtime wrote: »

A simple suggestion is to spread the rewards for 100% completion into each run. Something like some 5* shards, 1 t2a, some sig stones 1 set (all class) of t4c per run. And then when 100% you get the rest of the rewards. I for one do not want to finish LOL or buy any of these BS t2a shards for a premium price atm, but if I know i am only 1 away to form my 4th t2a for another 4/55 I may just go do that LOL run. Also makes sense from a item limit perspective. Some ppls may have maxed out t4c of a certain class and just can't get another 3 t4c of each class all at the same time knowing that they are useless when expired. Also no need to retrofit rewards for ppls who already completed LOL 100% since it's essentially the same rewards.

Nice idea

xNig

Bad idea.

This will remove the orgasm of 100% exploration from those who want to. Anyway, like what someone above mentioned, subsequent completion rewards for all game quests are **** compared to the initial completion and final exploration.

Come on, it's just 7 paths. Instead of seeing it as a "1 generic 5* sig stone" per run reward, see it as "a part of the final exploration reward that hasn't been awarded to you yet" for each subsequent run.

It'll make you feel better and less salty.

Antman2000me

I agree they should be spread and of course give the most at the 100% completion.

LeNoirFaineant

I think this would have been fine if they had released it that way. But so many have done it 100% as it is I’m not sure changing it is a good idea. I’ve only done one path and am saving for 100% (going to do it with no real $ spent) so I’d be happy to get more for each subsequent run, but I don’t think they should change it at this point