will-o-wisp wrote: » That doesn't prove anything ... Just bad luck.
DTMelodicMetal wrote: » will-o-wisp wrote: » That doesn't prove anything ... Just bad luck. https://sciencing.com/meaning-sample-size-5988804.html@DNA3000 is the expert on this stuff, but the above video's margin for error being around 2-2.25% is believable
Masuarao wrote: » When you have a large sample size, the actual set unknown chance is reflected by the results. Hence his rates are not too far from actual rates.
NastyEfnNate wrote: » People are actually defending the drop rate? SMH
Dingalo wrote: » Guys... I play more hours a day than I sleep, and I haven't pulled a 4* since December 2016. I gave up believing a LOOOONG time ago.
JK171386 wrote: » So.....should i start playing the lottery then??