Looking for players over 300K prestige.

There was a typo guys. Relax. He meant 30,000 prestige k? Not 300,000 prestige obviously.

BCdiscman

MattScott wrote: »

There was a typo guys. Relax. He meant 30,000 prestige k? Not 300,000 prestige obviously.

That is what is so funny. It is the reason so many people here & on reddit & on the Line app are laughing about this post... 30k prestige is NOT a thing!!! The highest prestige in the game is under 8k. 300k is ridiculous but so is 30k!!! And no OP you cannot just make up your own definition for something that already exists and expect people to just roll with it.

BCdiscman wrote: »

MattScott wrote: »

There was a typo guys. Relax. He meant 30,000 prestige k? Not 300,000 prestige obviously.

That is what is so funny. It is the reason so many people here & on reddit & on the Line app are laughing about this post... 30k prestige is NOT a thing!!! The highest prestige in the game is under 8k. 300k is ridiculous but so is 30k!!! And no OP you cannot just make up your own definition for something that already exists and expect people to just roll with it.

You missed my sarcasm

DangerNoodle

When you hear someone only recruiting 30k+ prestige players... 😂😂😂

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

Sociopath warning!

Dude, just admit you have no clue wtf you're even talking about and own your mistake.

Take this opportunity to learn and not look like an absolute fool when you recruit.

And I have 600K+ rating, and I'm telling you rating isn't important. It means nothing.

Dude, I just explained why rating is important for people like you who have no clue wtf you're even talking about. Show me a player who has a high rating that is a less than desirable player to have in an alliance? So according to you players with a high rating says nothing about the quality of player they are? And it says nothing about benefitting the others in the alliance with SA rewards? Sociopath warning lol? Says the guy who hides his profile? Ok buddy. When people realize they are wrong they have to resort to name calling that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Remember that.

1) You can literally have a 200K rating with nothing but 1, 2 and 3*s.

2) I've seen and played with many highly rated players that apparently play the game with their wang because there is no way you're that bad if you're using 2 hands.

3) Rating means nothing. You continue to dig a deeper and deeper hole for yourself.
Prestige = #1 recruiting number based system
PI = #2 because it gives insight into masteries
Number of champs = #3 because it shows your versatility in other facets of the game
Rating = a distant #4 because it means nothing

4) There is no such thing as simplified prestige. You can't just make something up and call it a thing.

Edit:

My profile - IGN |Zzyzx|

SBN

Scoobers40 wrote: »

Haha it was supposed to say 30K for prestige lol. Damn auto correct.

DangerNoodle

" When people realize they are wrong they have to resort to name calling that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Remember that."
-Scoobers40 2018

Quite the insightful quote my friend. It sounds as if it refers to yourself 😂
@Scoobers40

Scoobers40

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

P.S. It's obvious you're recruiting based off rating... that is an awful idea, by the way. Rating means next to nothing.

Rating means a lot lol. I'm not going to accept recruit players who don't have a 4* champion. I'm also not going to accept recruit players who don't have over 30 for a pvp win streak either or less than 100 champions in their roster either. As a bare minimum players need to have over 30K prestige though.

You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

You don't understand what I'm talking about, do you? You say rating means next to nothing. Since you don't understand rating, a players rating of his top 5 champions over 30K along with a high pvp win streak is a good indicator of how decent a player is.

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

P.S. It's obvious you're recruiting based off rating... that is an awful idea, by the way. Rating means next to nothing.

Rating means a lot lol. I'm not going to accept recruit players who don't have a 4* champion. I'm also not going to accept recruit players who don't have over 30 for a pvp win streak either or less than 100 champions in their roster either. As a bare minimum players need to have over 30K prestige though.

You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

You don't understand what I'm talking about, do you? You say rating means next to nothing. Since you don't understand rating, a players rating of his top 5 champions over 30K along with a high pvp win streak is a good indicator of how decent a player is.

No it's not.

You can have suicide masteries along with **** champs and break 30K PI with 5 champs. You're not even talking about rating anymore... You're talking about PI.

You can quickmatch 100 times and have a PvP streak of 100 without ever entering an arena.

You are clueless about this game.

This content has been removed.

Assuming a similar rate of progression this guy is ONLY asking for your top 5 champs to be max 7/75 8 Star champs.

Oh and a 30 win pvp streak.

ImranAzhar

Give him a break guys.

This content has been removed.

Elitehunter wrote: »

Surprised this thread hasn't been shutdown yet lol

Don’t think he has found his recruit yet.

ImranAzhar wrote: »

Give him a break guys.

Why? Have you read what he's been saying?

Queqquee

i think no one told him that prestige simply cannot be obtained via ingame profile or the top 5 champs....

Queqquee wrote: »

i think no one told him that prestige simply cannot be obtained via ingame profile or the top 5 champs....

Yeah but simplified prestige can. If you multiply by quest fights won, then divide by the total pvp win streak

MattScott wrote: »

Queqquee wrote: »

i think no one told him that prestige simply cannot be obtained via ingame profile or the top 5 champs....

Yeah but simplified prestige can. If you multiply by quest fights won, then divide by the total pvp win streak

You forgot to square it by total number of champs. Don't you know anything?

This image sums up your stupidity

ImranAzhar wrote: »

Give him a break guys.

He's your officer isn't he?

Palito_Diaz

Elitehunter wrote: »

Surprised this thread hasn't been shutdown yet lol

No please don't shut this thread down yet lol

Taking bets on how much longer this thread stays open.

PixelProYT

Bayouem

This is hilarious.

Scoobers40

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

P.S. It's obvious you're recruiting based off rating... that is an awful idea, by the way. Rating means next to nothing.

Rating means a lot lol. I'm not going to accept recruit players who don't have a 4* champion. I'm also not going to accept recruit players who don't have over 30 for a pvp win streak either or less than 100 champions in their roster either. As a bare minimum players need to have over 30K prestige though.

You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

You don't understand what I'm talking about, do you? You say rating means next to nothing. Since you don't understand rating, a players rating of his top 5 champions over 30K along with a high pvp win streak is a good indicator of how decent a player is.

No it's not.

You can have suicide masteries along with **** champs and break 30K PI with 5 champs. You're not even talking about rating anymore... You're talking about PI.

You can quickmatch 100 times and have a PvP streak of 100 without ever entering an arena.

You are clueless about this game.

Then why doesn't everyone quick match and have over a 100 pvp win streak??? According to your logic everyone should have enough at least a 100 pvp win streak if it was so easy.

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

Scoobers40 wrote: »

ZzyzxGuy wrote: »

P.S. It's obvious you're recruiting based off rating... that is an awful idea, by the way. Rating means next to nothing.

Rating means a lot lol. I'm not going to accept recruit players who don't have a 4* champion. I'm also not going to accept recruit players who don't have over 30 for a pvp win streak either or less than 100 champions in their roster either. As a bare minimum players need to have over 30K prestige though.

You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?

You don't understand what I'm talking about, do you? You say rating means next to nothing. Since you don't understand rating, a players rating of his top 5 champions over 30K along with a high pvp win streak is a good indicator of how decent a player is.

No it's not.

You can have suicide masteries along with **** champs and break 30K PI with 5 champs. You're not even talking about rating anymore... You're talking about PI.

You can quickmatch 100 times and have a PvP streak of 100 without ever entering an arena.

You are clueless about this game.

Then why doesn't everyone quick match and have over a 100 pvp win streak??? According to your logic everyone should have enough at least a 100 pvp win streak if it was so easy.

Because no one cares about a PvP win streak... except for 30K simplified prestige players, of course.

This content has been removed.

This content has been removed.