**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Shout out to dorky Dave. He nailed this one. A must watch!
Kamikaze_Turtle
Posts: 864 ★★★
https://youtu.be/Mxq-H1VJ1Uw32
Comments
To have a bad apple, there gotta be an apple to begin with, can't have a bad apple without an apple there to turn bad.
To have a bad leadership, a company needs to have a leader or some kind of leadership in place to begin with. Can't have a bad leadership if there's no leadership there to begin with.
Are we talking about Kabam or some other companies out there? If it is Kabam, great leaders are everywhere, and everything is WORKING AS INTENDED. They are too great (thanks to people who spent so much to make them so great) until all other players maybe too tiny and insignificant to be considered, except whales.
This.
Of course, this is to say nothing about the value of money spent given the plethora of never ending glitches.
For several players who follow this logic early on, it does pay off because others who join later want to be at the forefront right away. There is a market for big spender accounts.
As time progresses and the game goes through various updates, the player base slowly becomes aware that the end is coming. No game will last forever. Even the biggest alliances of spenders cannot keep the game afloat. The market for big account fades and the big spenders do eventually stop playing.
I was in one of the big spender alliances in another game, and this was precisely their thought process. It was painful watching them throw more money into something that was dying. It genuinely hurt when I uninstalled that game because I knew that several thousand dollars was literally gone with nothing to show for it.
A long term transparent game plan is well needed. I am so tired of this “fixing” unintended outcomes of earlier decisions.
Why is it so wrong to explore 100%? The only real reason you are making the map harder is, that you want us to spent even more resources/money to succeed in AW.
Why do you remove diversity and at the same time stating that it can return in the future? It is almost an insult to all of us that have wasted so many resources on semi good defenders. Remove diversity for good or keep it ... no such thing as “maybe”. We need long term planning of gold etc.
thank you for the video. I agree 100% but sadly how often does Kabam do the right thing? I am not sure what my future holds in this game. Over 3 years and a whole lot of money, and time invested..... I really would hate to see it all go to waste but my motivation to stay at a high level is fading quicker than the sunset
I'm sure they could post as easily as you had in the Forum but they didn't.
These players stated their personal position and nothing more.
These threads seem inflammatory and using their name brings nothing good.
I don't want to talk in their name but I feel they are used.
and this is the most dangerous point of all the bs being said these days.
Arbitraliry reserving the right to switch metas at your pure will equals to scamming your players, end of story.
Metas are made by players, where the Devs put their hands on it just to tweak what is too strong or weak. There is no precedent of a game where meta switching can void a year's worth of progression, anywhere.
MMo introduces new content, new items and equips, but older equips still have to be used combining them with new ones, that's the whole point. Think if a mmo did the same pushing out OP stand alone equipment, half of their content online would cease to be fought and could very well be erased. Comparing it back to mcoc, "content" equals to champions in this case, meaning said "content" (champions) could be very well trashed away for good.
And the thought of "oh it could come back handy when they put back diversity" doesn't hold cause by then there'll be different diversity champ way better than the ones you ranked for naugh.
Besides, what kind of game says "you're not supposed to 100% the content"? That may be one of the most blatant egregious statements made by mods on here revealing that the changes are really only to turn this into "WALLET WARS."
The proposed changes are bad, Kabam's communication skills and ideas are bad, and they should feel bad. If I were this consistently bad at my job, I'd have been fired by now.
Cheers to Dorky Dave for telling it like it needs to be to Kabam!