Kabam Miike wrote: » Summoners! We've just posted a list of Adjustments coming to Alliance Wars Season 3. Check out the post here. You've probably got questions, so ask away! Remember, Season 3 starts on July 11th!
Kabam Miike wrote: » Rockon wrote: » and what about awakening gems for us that awakened champs used strictly for war? You can still use those Champions on Defense if you please, and might want to use them again in the future. This was a choice based on the Meta of the game at the time. The Meta will always change, and what might be a great Champion on Defense now, might not be in a few weeks, or a month, and then could end up as the top defender again in another 4 months. There will be no Rank Down Tickets, or anything of the like, for this Change. EDIT: For Clarity
Rockon wrote: » and what about awakening gems for us that awakened champs used strictly for war?
Captain_Kandice wrote: » People need to chill on the rdts. They aren’t going to solve this by themselves. Rdts don’t give back awakening gems or sig stones and if they are like the ones we got last time, we won’t get gold. So those rdts will end up costing you even more.
SandeepS wrote: » Kabam Miike wrote: » Rockon wrote: » and what about awakening gems for us that awakened champs used strictly for war? You can still use those Champions on Defense if you please, and might want to use them again in the future. This was a choice based on the Meta of the game at the time. The Meta will always change, and what might be a great Champion on Defense now, might not be in a few weeks, or a month, and then could end up as the top defender again in another 4 months. There will be no Rank Down Tickets, or anything of the like, for this Change. EDIT: For Clarity This is a sad post. If the meta can change at any point we would never know how to use the limited resources we have. A change in meta of this magnitude should have rank down tickets. This is a classic case of moving the goalposts. You see the goal, even if the shot is on target if you move the goalposts too far you'll not score. Unfair.
CapWW2 wrote: » Trying to keep this constructive??? How ???? If kabam wants do to what they want to do without trying to listen our disgust.
EhDubb wrote: » It’s becoming evident that this company is not trustworthy.
Kabam Miike wrote: » hurricant wrote: » Kabam Miike wrote: » NevvB wrote: » So you made the nodes harder, any changes in rewards? The rewards have not changed (aside from Season rewards being halved to match the change in length). This is because Alliances were still finding these Maps far too easy. The goal of these changes is to put an end to the near 100% of wars ending in 100% Exploration. what's wrong with 100% exploration? people will continue to pay for 100% you know that right? 100% exploration should be a rare instance, and if achieved, should be helping to decide the winner of a War. It should not be a common occurrence for both Alliances to be able to hit 100%, and then the deciding factor becomes Attacker Bonus points.
hurricant wrote: » Kabam Miike wrote: » NevvB wrote: » So you made the nodes harder, any changes in rewards? The rewards have not changed (aside from Season rewards being halved to match the change in length). This is because Alliances were still finding these Maps far too easy. The goal of these changes is to put an end to the near 100% of wars ending in 100% Exploration. what's wrong with 100% exploration? people will continue to pay for 100% you know that right?
Kabam Miike wrote: » NevvB wrote: » So you made the nodes harder, any changes in rewards? The rewards have not changed (aside from Season rewards being halved to match the change in length). This is because Alliances were still finding these Maps far too easy. The goal of these changes is to put an end to the near 100% of wars ending in 100% Exploration.
NevvB wrote: » So you made the nodes harder, any changes in rewards?
Raganator wrote: » EhDubb wrote: » It’s becoming evident that this company is not trustworthy. Haven't trusted them since 12.0. I have approached the game in a manner that regardless of what you do, Kabam can take it away the next day.
CapWW2 wrote: » How about then instead of rank down tickets we get: Depending in rating: 400k+ rating 1 feature 6 star crystal 1 fearure 5 star crystal 1 random awekening gem 3 t4cc 3 t4b 300+ 1 fearure 5 star crystal 1 random awekening gem 2 t4cc 2 t4b Below 200k 1 feature 5 star crystal 1 t4cc 1 t4b 1 four star awakening gem crystal
Aspare wrote: » We are asking for the wrong solution from Kabam I don't know about you guys but I would much rather keep Diversity around instead of getting rank down tickets. I would love to rank down some champions I ranked up just for defense but I would much rather not have to fight IWIM, Medusa, Domino, Dormamu, 10x each war.
CapWW2 wrote: » CapWW2 wrote: » How about then instead of rank down tickets we get: Depending in rating: 400k+ rating 1 feature 6 star crystal 1 fearure 5 star crystal 1 random awekening gem 3 t4cc 3 t4b 300+ 1 fearure 5 star crystal 1 random awekening gem 2 t4cc 2 t4b Below 200k 1 feature 5 star crystal 1 t4cc 1 t4b 1 four star awakening gem crystal This is fair or gives us the 5 rank down tickets for 5 stars champs
SantaGulk wrote: » CapWW2 wrote: » CapWW2 wrote: » How about then instead of rank down tickets we get: Depending in rating: 400k+ rating 1 feature 6 star crystal 1 fearure 5 star crystal 1 random awekening gem 3 t4cc 3 t4b 300+ 1 fearure 5 star crystal 1 random awekening gem 2 t4cc 2 t4b Below 200k 1 feature 5 star crystal 1 t4cc 1 t4b 1 four star awakening gem crystal This is fair or gives us the 5 rank down tickets for 5 stars champs That's not a solution. Kabam is trying too hard to create a PAY TO WIN aw environment. It's not just about diversity. It's about how much you'll spend in the future aw.