GroundedWisdom wrote: » Yes. I found it adequate. Didn't even think the comment implied anything other than play it like you would. I've already made that abundantly clear. I didn't answer because I already answered it.
Fredhorst23 wrote: » Easy enough. GroundedWisdom wrote: » It's not about right or wrong at this point. It's about a rant over things people don't know. We don't know what the Mod was occupied with, or why they didn't respond. They could have been busy. They could have been away from the Forum and popped in with an update. Could have had nothing else to add. We don't know. I know one thing is for sure. People are overanalyzing the **** out of everything and it really doesn't matter at this point. I'm over this conversation. It's just ridiculous the amount people will complain. When there's something major, that's one thing. When people start looking for reasons, I'm saying peace. It's that part in the middle where you say we don't know. That's exactly correct. We don't but we should. We're just saying that this all went poorly, as easily evidenced by us even having this conversation, and that in the future we'd like to see it go differently.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » It's not about right or wrong at this point. It's about a rant over things people don't know. We don't know what the Mod was occupied with, or why they didn't respond. They could have been busy. They could have been away from the Forum and popped in with an update. Could have had nothing else to add. We don't know. I know one thing is for sure. People are overanalyzing the **** out of everything and it really doesn't matter at this point. I'm over this conversation. It's just ridiculous the amount people will complain. When there's something major, that's one thing. When people start looking for reasons, I'm saying peace.
LeNoirFaineant wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Yes. I found it adequate. Didn't even think the comment implied anything other than play it like you would. I've already made that abundantly clear. I didn't answer because I already answered it. If you really believe that your interpretation was the only reasonable interpretation and that no clarification was needed despite the pages of posts, you must think we are all stupid. I think you are being dishonest.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » LeNoirFaineant wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Yes. I found it adequate. Didn't even think the comment implied anything other than play it like you would. I've already made that abundantly clear. I didn't answer because I already answered it. If you really believe that your interpretation was the only reasonable interpretation and that no clarification was needed despite the pages of posts, you must think we are all stupid. I think you are being dishonest. You asked me a question. I answered honestly. Now you're just baiting.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » LeNoirFaineant wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » As I said before, I don't agree that it was a miscommunication because I don't believe they even knew what course of action they were going to take at that time. When the Moderator gave the response, it was my understanding it was in response to whether people should proceed or not. It's really that simple for me. If they didn't know what course of action they were going to take then obviously it was miscommunication. They could have told us to keep running our normal maps to play it safe. They could have said we don't know what we are going to do yet and left it at that. They could have clarified after pages of posts asking for clarification. Given how many people were confused or made the wrong decision based on that communication, by freaking definition it was miscommunication and miscommunication which could have been fixed with one simple reply. So while you are free to disagree, you are objectively wrong. You may want to look up the definition of miscommunication. There's a big difference between miscommunication and having nothing else to say.
LeNoirFaineant wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » As I said before, I don't agree that it was a miscommunication because I don't believe they even knew what course of action they were going to take at that time. When the Moderator gave the response, it was my understanding it was in response to whether people should proceed or not. It's really that simple for me. If they didn't know what course of action they were going to take then obviously it was miscommunication. They could have told us to keep running our normal maps to play it safe. They could have said we don't know what we are going to do yet and left it at that. They could have clarified after pages of posts asking for clarification. Given how many people were confused or made the wrong decision based on that communication, by freaking definition it was miscommunication and miscommunication which could have been fixed with one simple reply. So while you are free to disagree, you are objectively wrong. You may want to look up the definition of miscommunication.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » As I said before, I don't agree that it was a miscommunication because I don't believe they even knew what course of action they were going to take at that time. When the Moderator gave the response, it was my understanding it was in response to whether people should proceed or not. It's really that simple for me.