GroundedWisdom wrote: » I'm speaking for my own experience. It's a Poll. I don't need people to tell me what's hard and what's not for where I'm at. I do it every month. I haven't really said much at all about EQ difficulty. This one I did. There's truth to that. Seriously, people need to back off and let me speak for myself.
Saiyan wrote: » djr17 wrote: » Saiyan wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Just pointing out that your in the minority of players who see this as hard. Which proves it's not a upgraded challenge but a skills gap This is exactly it, it's a skill gap and that's all there is to it. He isn't like Dark Guillotine from some months ago, now that was alittle much. Saying there is a skill gap implies there is an upgraded challenge. And I hit the wrong option. I DO NOT think it should be nerfed. We could use the word upgraded but he also falls short in other ways. No sp3, the unblockable at the end is made easier by the power again to be able to bait, even the regen makes the unblockable easier as you can get him over 25% to finish him off, his move set is standard and lame. He's a heavy downgrade from 5.4 Ultron so it's not that bad. I also forgot the mention that Proxima can parry him even at 25%
djr17 wrote: » Saiyan wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Just pointing out that your in the minority of players who see this as hard. Which proves it's not a upgraded challenge but a skills gap This is exactly it, it's a skill gap and that's all there is to it. He isn't like Dark Guillotine from some months ago, now that was alittle much. Saying there is a skill gap implies there is an upgraded challenge. And I hit the wrong option. I DO NOT think it should be nerfed.
Saiyan wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Just pointing out that your in the minority of players who see this as hard. Which proves it's not a upgraded challenge but a skills gap This is exactly it, it's a skill gap and that's all there is to it. He isn't like Dark Guillotine from some months ago, now that was alittle much.
Dropfaith wrote: » Just pointing out that your in the minority of players who see this as hard. Which proves it's not a upgraded challenge but a skills gap
djr17 wrote: » Saiyan wrote: » djr17 wrote: » Saiyan wrote: » Dropfaith wrote: » Just pointing out that your in the minority of players who see this as hard. Which proves it's not a upgraded challenge but a skills gap This is exactly it, it's a skill gap and that's all there is to it. He isn't like Dark Guillotine from some months ago, now that was alittle much. Saying there is a skill gap implies there is an upgraded challenge. And I hit the wrong option. I DO NOT think it should be nerfed. We could use the word upgraded but he also falls short in other ways. No sp3, the unblockable at the end is made easier by the power again to be able to bait, even the regen makes the unblockable easier as you can get him over 25% to finish him off, his move set is standard and lame. He's a heavy downgrade from 5.4 Ultron so it's not that bad. I also forgot the mention that Proxima can parry him even at 25% Yes, but no sp3 means it can chain a sp2 into a sp1, which is it's own challenge, regardless of how tired the move set is.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Let me speak for myself. If I want advice, I'll ask. If I'm sharing my experience, the last thing that's helpful is someone telling me I'm wrong, because their experience was different. Unless you're me, you can't dispute that.
Hulksmasshh wrote: » I think the problem arises from those unwilling to accept any advice or suggestions from others that go against their mindset. It's an ego issue. If someone comes onto the forum with the pre-determined mindset that "this content is too difficult no matter" while automatically deeming any useful counters, guides, tips that fellow summoners have provided as condescending, there's no constructive criticism that can come out of a discussion. It's an intolerant behavior and ranting - which is against forum rules.
Raganator wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » Let me speak for myself. If I want advice, I'll ask. If I'm sharing my experience, the last thing that's helpful is someone telling me I'm wrong, because their experience was different. Unless you're me, you can't dispute that. So basically you are admitting to being stubborn to your own opinion. People offer help, you don't want their help or to try different tactics, but rather (in your opinion) the champ should instead be nerfed so that your standard questing team (whoever that may be) should be able to walk through every champ like they do every other month. I think that is an adequate summary.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » You mean I'm not open to being forced to accept opinions? No. When I'm asked my feelings and thoughts on something, that's what I'm giving. I'm capable of asking what people did to deal with it, what I'm doing wrong, what's the best solution, etc. What's really stubborn is persisting on someone because they don't see things the same. I think it was too amped up. That's what my experience was, that's how I feel, that is the topic. I don't need to be badgered into taking unwarranted advice and thinking I'm wrong.
DrZola wrote: » I remember Joe Fixit... Honestly, the only beef I have with opponents like the Hydra Adaptoid is that they often require high precision game play in a game notorious for lags and frame rate problems. Dr. Zola
Sighsohard wrote: » DrZola wrote: » I remember Joe Fixit... Honestly, the only beef I have with opponents like the Hydra Adaptoid is that they often require high precision game play in a game notorious for lags and frame rate problems. Dr. Zola I never thought I would agree with Zola. But he’s 100% right. It’s the lag that isn’t the problem. Not the champion. When you swipe back to evade and the screen freezes for 2-3 seconds and you’re desperately continuously swiping only to get hit with an easy L1..... That’s the issue.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Oh, I see. You just wanted to take jabs at me. I just agreed with you partly. I said the lag was a contributor. If you're just going to make it personal, we don't need to speak.
Vger wrote: » Honestly...to me Heimdall is worse with his immediate power gain and 2 bar start. If he doesn't SP2 immediately you are toast unless you have duped Ice, duped Cage, or duped Gwenpool to tank that SP3. Maybe something else I'm not thinking of, but I don't know. Seems much more limited in your options than the Hydra Adaptoid.
Shaun01 wrote: » GW is salty because he picked a team and got to the boss and got wiped. Instead of backing out and reassessing the situation, he "pushed through" and dumped a bunch of revives and health pots. Then gets on forums to complain about the difficulty and sees that many in the community have found the answer, like always. Patience is a virtue. It pays to not "power through" on day one of the EQ. The More You Know****
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Shaun01 wrote: » GW is salty because he picked a team and got to the boss and got wiped. Instead of backing out and reassessing the situation, he "pushed through" and dumped a bunch of revives and health pots. Then gets on forums to complain about the difficulty and sees that many in the community have found the answer, like always. Patience is a virtue. It pays to not "power through" on day one of the EQ. The More You Know**** The largest suggestion people came up with is going in with a 2* or 3* Ronan and creating a Stun loop. That's a clear indication there's something to what I'm saying, but you're trying to make it about me. Not the topic.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're trying to argue my own thoughts and feelings. There is no wrong.
LeNoirFaineant wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're trying to argue my own thoughts and feelings. There is no wrong. Thoughts and feelings can be wrong... as you have proven today.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » LeNoirFaineant wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're trying to argue my own thoughts and feelings. There is no wrong. Thoughts and feelings can be wrong... as you have proven today. That's about as arrogant as it comes. People wouldn't even be arguing this much if it wasn't me commenting. Here's a very simple concept. OP asks what people think (feel). People respond. There's no debate, no right or wrong, just opinions. One person thinks there's nothing wrong with it. One person thinks it's too much. End of story. It's a Poll. Not a trap into argument. You can't tell someone they're wrong when they're expressing their own thoughts and feelings based on THEIR OWN experience. You can't speak for them. Instead, it turns into an overpowering of opinions because people think they're right and someone else is wrong. Don't tell me my experience is wrong. You're not me. You don't speak for me or my experience. My thoughts are that it's too much, and I don't give a flying fig who thinks I'm wrong. That's my view. It should be respectfully disagreeing instead of pushing someone's view into a corner because people are worried it will be taken seriously.
Snizzbar wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » LeNoirFaineant wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » You're trying to argue my own thoughts and feelings. There is no wrong. Thoughts and feelings can be wrong... as you have proven today. That's about as arrogant as it comes. People wouldn't even be arguing this much if it wasn't me commenting. Here's a very simple concept. OP asks what people think (feel). People respond. There's no debate, no right or wrong, just opinions. One person thinks there's nothing wrong with it. One person thinks it's too much. End of story. It's a Poll. Not a trap into argument. You can't tell someone they're wrong when they're expressing their own thoughts and feelings based on THEIR OWN experience. You can't speak for them. Instead, it turns into an overpowering of opinions because people think they're right and someone else is wrong. Don't tell me my experience is wrong. You're not me. You don't speak for me or my experience. My thoughts are that it's too much, and I don't give a flying fig who thinks I'm wrong. That's my view. It should be respectfully disagreeing instead of pushing someone's view into a corner because people are worried it will be taken seriously. I can see your point, and I somewhat agree, but in that case why do you so often comment on things that relate to Uncollected difficulty?
GroundedWisdom wrote: » The largest suggestion people came up with is going in with a 2* or 3* Ronan and creating a Stun loop. That's a clear indication there's something to what I'm saying, but you're trying to make it about me. Not the topic. Going by what you are saying, Blades synergies are a "loophole". Using a bleed immune against say, Hawkeye would be a "loophole". When one one my alliance mates suggested Ronan I said, Oh, just like Venom in Act 4? He said exactly. So using Ronan like this isn't anything new. People just get locked into a set of Champs for questing. People forget about the different abilities that all these champs have, myself included. It isn't a loophole.