dkatryl wrote: » People asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT are focusing on how USELESS those champs are without MD, and other hyperbolic comments, and trying to keep the narrative firmly there. What they are glossing over is that they knew exactly how OP MD was. That any kills by their 'otherwise useless' mystic champs were, by extension, entirely due to MD. They knowingly participated in exploiting a broken relationship between Dexterity and MD, and enjoyed the benefits of this with more defensive kills, increasing the likelihood of getting AW wins, which means better rewards. So now that they have reaped those benefits, they want to be able to just shift their resources into the new AWD hotness, such as auto-parry champs. With relatively no consequence. And expect everyone to just universally agree that is fair, including those that didn't participate in the MD nonsense. So, my question is how many people would still be asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT's if they had to refund those rewards they got while using those R4/R5 Mystics on defense?
GroundedWisdom wrote: » dkatryl wrote: » People asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT are focusing on how USELESS those champs are without MD, and other hyperbolic comments, and trying to keep the narrative firmly there. What they are glossing over is that they knew exactly how OP MD was. That any kills by their 'otherwise useless' mystic champs were, by extension, entirely due to MD. They knowingly participated in exploiting a broken relationship between Dexterity and MD, and enjoyed the benefits of this with more defensive kills, increasing the likelihood of getting AW wins, which means better rewards. So now that they have reaped those benefits, they want to be able to just shift their resources into the new AWD hotness, such as auto-parry champs. With relatively no consequence. And expect everyone to just universally agree that is fair, including those that didn't participate in the MD nonsense. So, my question is how many people would still be asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT's if they had to refund those rewards they got while using those R4/R5 Mystics on defense? Agreed. People got more than enough out of the Mastery. My issue is that's not what the Tickets are for. They're not for changes to anything other than the Champs themselves, specifically the Champs. I'm also not going to subscribe to the idea of how those Champs NEED MD to be useful. That's not logical or even accurate. No Champ depends on MD for functioning. This is what happens when people spend valuable Resources for one area of the game alone. Anything can change. There's a great deal of argument on how valuable those Resources are, but very little introspect at how there was little forethought in selection. If you're going to spend valuable Resources for one aspect that is changing, like War or AQ, then you run the risk of less useful Champs later on when that aspect changes. In this case, the Mastery changed, but same principle. Ranking is irreversible. With valuable Resources, it's best to look at all-around usefulness.
If you're going to spend valuable Resources for one aspect that is changing, like War or AQ, then you run the risk of less useful Champs later on when that aspect changes.
So, my question is how many people would still be asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT's if they had to refund those rewards they got while using those R4/R5 Mystics on defense?
So now that they have reaped those benefits, they want to be able to just shift their resources into the new AWD hotness, such as auto-parry champs. With relatively no consequence. And expect everyone to just universally agree that is fair, including those that didn't participate in the MD nonsense.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » dkatryl wrote: » People asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT are focusing on how USELESS those champs are without MD, and other hyperbolic comments, and trying to keep the narrative firmly there. What they are glossing over is that they knew exactly how OP MD was. That any kills by their 'otherwise useless' mystic champs were, by extension, entirely due to MD. They knowingly participated in exploiting a broken relationship between Dexterity and MD, and enjoyed the benefits of this with more defensive kills, increasing the likelihood of getting AW wins, which means better rewards. So now that they have reaped those benefits, they want to be able to just shift their resources into the new AWD hotness, such as auto-parry champs. With relatively no consequence. And expect everyone to just universally agree that is fair, including those that didn't participate in the MD nonsense. So, my question is how many people would still be asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT's if they had to refund those rewards they got while using those R4/R5 Mystics on defense? Agreed. People got more than enough out of the Mastery. My issue is that's not what the Tickets are for. They're not for changes to anything other than the Champs themselves, specifically the Champs.
Lewaspl wrote: » I made 5 star ghost rider to rank 5 I gave him generic awakening Stone Ale 100 signatures and Also md to rank5 and now it will be less usefull in both aw and quests where I mainly use ghost rider and I wont get back my awakening signatures and rank down even when I know I wont use him anymore in aliance war I will get just some loyality wich I dont need.i think this is really not fair because I just lost most of act5 progresion and I wont get anything.
Badrose wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » dkatryl wrote: » People asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT are focusing on how USELESS those champs are without MD, and other hyperbolic comments, and trying to keep the narrative firmly there. What they are glossing over is that they knew exactly how OP MD was. That any kills by their 'otherwise useless' mystic champs were, by extension, entirely due to MD. They knowingly participated in exploiting a broken relationship between Dexterity and MD, and enjoyed the benefits of this with more defensive kills, increasing the likelihood of getting AW wins, which means better rewards. So now that they have reaped those benefits, they want to be able to just shift their resources into the new AWD hotness, such as auto-parry champs. With relatively no consequence. And expect everyone to just universally agree that is fair, including those that didn't participate in the MD nonsense. So, my question is how many people would still be asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT's if they had to refund those rewards they got while using those R4/R5 Mystics on defense? Agreed. People got more than enough out of the Mastery. My issue is that's not what the Tickets are for. They're not for changes to anything other than the Champs themselves, specifically the Champs. I'm also not going to subscribe to the idea of how those Champs NEED MD to be useful. That's not logical or even accurate. No Champ depends on MD for functioning. This is what happens when people spend valuable Resources for one area of the game alone. Anything can change. There's a great deal of argument on how valuable those Resources are, but very little introspect at how there was little forethought in selection. If you're going to spend valuable Resources for one aspect that is changing, like War or AQ, then you run the risk of less useful Champs later on when that aspect changes. In this case, the Mastery changed, but same principle. Ranking is irreversible. With valuable Resources, it's best to look at all-around usefulness. This is totally nonsense. It is (was) MYSTIC dispersion, not a GENERIC mastery to increase something for every class, so you cant's say "I'm also not going to subscribe to the idea of how those Champs NEED MD to be useful". If you change a specific mastery you destroy a specific class for which you spent tons of resources, time and MONEY. No one with a grain of salt would have ranked his Juggernaut without MD, not even Dormammu. If else, you simply don't understand how MD changed the use of some champs. Was MD too powerful? Yes! Nerf needed? Yes! But it was their mistake and now all they have to do is give us MYSTIC rank down tickets to avoid a fraudolent action. If you're going to spend valuable Resources for one aspect that is changing, like War or AQ, then you run the risk of less useful Champs later on when that aspect changes. One aspect that is changing? Too easy... According to this theory we don't have to spend in anything just because everything may change in the game. While we accept that the game may change, they have to accept to refund their customers. Other quotes... So, my question is how many people would still be asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT's if they had to refund those rewards they got while using those R4/R5 Mystics on defense? This is even more nonsense. Just explain why we should refund rewards after regularly using a mastery they've created. As it was, MD was not an exploit, it was supposed to work exactly as it worked, it was just too powerfull just like many other things in this game. I don't ask to cut war rewards for those guys who are so lucky to have Blade on their attack phase and Domino on D-fence. So now that they have reaped those benefits, they want to be able to just shift their resources into the new AWD hotness, such as auto-parry champs. With relatively no consequence. And expect everyone to just universally agree that is fair, including those that didn't participate in the MD nonsense. Nonsense after nonsense. No consequences? We now have totally useless heros! What else do you want?
Toukolou wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » dkatryl wrote: » People asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT are focusing on how USELESS those champs are without MD, and other hyperbolic comments, and trying to keep the narrative firmly there. What they are glossing over is that they knew exactly how OP MD was. That any kills by their 'otherwise useless' mystic champs were, by extension, entirely due to MD. They knowingly participated in exploiting a broken relationship between Dexterity and MD, and enjoyed the benefits of this with more defensive kills, increasing the likelihood of getting AW wins, which means better rewards. So now that they have reaped those benefits, they want to be able to just shift their resources into the new AWD hotness, such as auto-parry champs. With relatively no consequence. And expect everyone to just universally agree that is fair, including those that didn't participate in the MD nonsense. So, my question is how many people would still be asking for R4/R5 Mystic RDT's if they had to refund those rewards they got while using those R4/R5 Mystics on defense? Agreed. People got more than enough out of the Mastery. My issue is that's not what the Tickets are for. They're not for changes to anything other than the Champs themselves, specifically the Champs. I'm also not going to subscribe to the idea of how those Champs NEED MD to be useful. That's not logical or even accurate. No Champ depends on MD for functioning. This is what happens when people spend valuable Resources for one area of the game alone. Anything can change. There's a great deal of argument on how valuable those Resources are, but very little introspect at how there was little forethought in selection. If you're going to spend valuable Resources for one aspect that is changing, like War or AQ, then you run the risk of less useful Champs later on when that aspect changes. In this case, the Mastery changed, but same principle. Ranking is irreversible. With valuable Resources, it's best to look at all-around usefulness. Doesn't matter what we rewards were reaped or why people ranked a particular mastery up. Kabam set the way it works up, allowed it to continue for a couple of years while more and more people ranked specific champs up according to the function of that mastery. Players didn't make the mastery OP, Kabam did. They are now fundamentally changing the function of that mastery. Players need compensation for the choices that were made using the rules kabam set up. Kabam changed those rules.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » People are being compensated for the change. The Mastery is what's changing. That's what's being compensated. Not the Champs, those aren't changing at all.
Demonzfyre wrote: » Lewaspl wrote: » I made 5 star ghost rider to rank 5 I gave him generic awakening Stone Ale 100 signatures and Also md to rank5 and now it will be less usefull in both aw and quests where I mainly use ghost rider and I wont get back my awakening signatures and rank down even when I know I wont use him anymore in aliance war I will get just some loyality wich I dont need.i think this is really not fair because I just lost most of act5 progresion and I wont get anything. @Lewaspl This is exactly the type of mis-information that shouldn't be in these threads. Ghost Rider will be changed very little by the changes made to MD. MD activates on buffs expiring and being nullified. GR excels at nullifying buffs through L1/L2. Just like before, he can benefit from using these specials with MD. GR will still be highly effective champ like he always has. I suggest re-reading the announcement post again for a better understanding of the MD changes.
winterthur wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » People are being compensated for the change. The Mastery is what's changing. That's what's being compensated. Not the Champs, those aren't changing at all. It is not true that changes to champ which 'weakens' the champ ability is followed by issuing RDT. I could be wrong but there was none when Gwenpool was changed.
GroundedWisdom wrote: » winterthur wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » People are being compensated for the change. The Mastery is what's changing. That's what's being compensated. Not the Champs, those aren't changing at all. It is not true that changes to champ which 'weakens' the champ ability is followed by issuing RDT. I could be wrong but there was none when Gwenpool was changed. The Champ's Ability is separate from MD, and in no way are the Champs dependent on MD to fucntion. It enhances their Power Gain. I also didn't say any and every change. A significant change to the way they were fundamentally intended to perform. GP wasn't significant. It was a fix for an exploitable mechanic.
Sirnoob2 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » winterthur wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » People are being compensated for the change. The Mastery is what's changing. That's what's being compensated. Not the Champs, those aren't changing at all. It is not true that changes to champ which 'weakens' the champ ability is followed by issuing RDT. I could be wrong but there was none when Gwenpool was changed. The Champ's Ability is separate from MD, and in no way are the Champs dependent on MD to fucntion. It enhances their Power Gain. I also didn't say any and every change. A significant change to the way they were fundamentally intended to perform. GP wasn't significant. It was a fix for an exploitable mechanic. ur logic does not work if it did we would've gotten rank down tickets when they re worked luke cage
GroundedWisdom wrote: » Sirnoob2 wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » winterthur wrote: » GroundedWisdom wrote: » People are being compensated for the change. The Mastery is what's changing. That's what's being compensated. Not the Champs, those aren't changing at all. It is not true that changes to champ which 'weakens' the champ ability is followed by issuing RDT. I could be wrong but there was none when Gwenpool was changed. The Champ's Ability is separate from MD, and in no way are the Champs dependent on MD to fucntion. It enhances their Power Gain. I also didn't say any and every change. A significant change to the way they were fundamentally intended to perform. GP wasn't significant. It was a fix for an exploitable mechanic. ur logic does not work if it did we would've gotten rank down tickets when they re worked luke cage I swear, any angle...... Let me put it more plainly. We aren't talking about buffs. We're talking nerfs. Major nerfs. To the Champs. Not content. Not Masteries. Nerfs. We haven't seen any like that in a year and a half.