Potential Delay to v44.1 Launch

We are currently working through some issues that may affect the release window of v44.1. This means that the update may not release on Monday as it usually does. We are working to resolve the issue holding us up as quickly as possible, but will keep you all updated, especially if the delay results in any changes to the content release schedule.
Options

AQ Map 6 costs need to be addressed

Is there a reason the previous post was deleted? @Kabam Miike @Kabam Wolf @Ad0ra_

Current costs to open map 6 need to be discussed and addressed by the game team. Why haven’t they been lowered by now considering they aren’t only being run once or twice by only a few alliances?

Comments

  • Options
    DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Posts: 21,087 ★★★★★
    Because that post derailed quickly into something non-constructive. Also if you are wanting Map 6 costs lowered, you will need to come up with a better excuse that "being run twice a cycle". That isn't anywhere near a good enough reason to change the costs. Also, stop tagging Wolf. He hasn't logged in since February.
  • Options
    VoluntarisVoluntaris Posts: 1,198 ★★★
    4loki runs map 6 full time and has no issue with the AQ Map 6 costs.
  • Options
    Voluntaris wrote: »
    4loki runs map 6 full time and has no issue with the AQ Map 6 costs.

    Speak for yourself, Nerf Map 6 cost and Voluntaris in patch 21.0
  • Options
    DocJCDocJC Posts: 74
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    Because that post derailed quickly into something non-constructive. Also if you are wanting Map 6 costs lowered, you will need to come up with a better excuse that "being run twice a cycle". That isn't anywhere near a good enough reason to change the costs. Also, stop tagging Wolf. He hasn't logged in since February.

    Lol why is it on the OP to provide better reasoning. He’s right.

    Map 6 costs are out of whack.

    4Loki please....they take just as much advantage as the black market to get donations.

    That every single alliance needs outside help to have enough resources to run map 6x5 should be enough reason that the costs are out of whack.

  • Options
    DocJC wrote: »
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    Because that post derailed quickly into something non-constructive. Also if you are wanting Map 6 costs lowered, you will need to come up with a better excuse that "being run twice a cycle". That isn't anywhere near a good enough reason to change the costs. Also, stop tagging Wolf. He hasn't logged in since February.

    Lol why is it on the OP to provide better reasoning. He’s right.

    In general, the burden of proof is on the person asking for change, because the default is no change.
Sign In or Register to comment.