Alliance War Tanking Off Season Needs to be fixed

HungaryHippoHungaryHippo Member Posts: 1,086 ★★★★
in Suggestions and Requests
What will Kabam do about the blatant tanking during off season? Sure they’re losing shards now but they’re investing into the season so they can match against lower tier alliances to smash them. [insert kabam comment about breaking the spirit of the game or whatever they said]. This needs to be addressed already. If Kabam is okay with this then just sell war decay items on the unit store and make some money off this at least. Someone bring GW in here.

l4abpoafeicm.jpeg
dq7slw65r0m7.jpeg


Comments

  • HungaryHippoHungaryHippo Member Posts: 1,086 ★★★★
    @Kabam Miike
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • thegrimmlingthegrimmling Member Posts: 167 ★
    They won't acknowledge this issue....ever.
  • LegendLegend Member Posts: 25 ★
    When an alliance commits to a search they should be committed to play.

    Just a waste of champs being locked in a mode that becomes a waste of time when I can be using them in other game modes.

    Spirit of the game is the unwritten rule of the contest. Kabam need to penalise. If alliances want a lower war rating they should get a lower multiplier too for the season.
  • PaytoPlayPaytoPlay Member Posts: 762 ★★★
    What happen when both alliances have empty maps and both finish 100%? Is that a tie? Lol
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,392 ★★★★★
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    What happen when both alliances have empty maps and both finish 100%? Is that a tie? Lol

    Yes it is and a loss for both
  • PaytoPlayPaytoPlay Member Posts: 762 ★★★
    edited October 2018
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    What happen when both alliances have empty maps and both finish 100%? Is that a tie? Lol

    Yes it is and a loss for both

    Sounds like a means to collusion. Tank at the same time . Lol
  • PaytoPlayPaytoPlay Member Posts: 762 ★★★
    edited October 2018
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    What happen when both alliances have empty maps and both finish 100%? Is that a tie? Lol

    Yes it is and a loss for both

    Sounds like a means to collusion. Tank at the same time . Lol

    You cant coordinate it though. You just have to hope they others do it.

    Tanking isnt against the rules as it's not in the ToS. Is it generally viewed as a negative. Yes but not illegal.

    Which I do agree if you see my other responses in a similar thread, but I never considered a double tank situation like this one until now. Going into attack phase with empty maps actually allow the alliances to collude during the attack phase (by getting a tie) arguably that will be illegal.
  • Batman05Batman05 Member Posts: 351 ★★
    If you didn’t want to tie just don’t explore as much as the other team if both teams didn’t want to place a defense that is
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • PaytoPlayPaytoPlay Member Posts: 762 ★★★
    edited October 2018
    Batman05 wrote: »
    If you didn’t want to tie just don’t explore as much as the other team if both teams didn’t want to place a defense that is

    You miss the point... Both teams want the tie (both places empty map). So their war rating will drop aka tanking
  • CFreeCFree Member Posts: 491 ★★
    edited October 2018
    Legend wrote: »
    When an alliance commits to a search they should be committed to play.

    Just a waste of champs being locked in a mode that becomes a waste of time when I can be using them in other game modes.

    Spirit of the game is the unwritten rule of the contest. Kabam need to penalise. If alliances want a lower war rating they should get a lower multiplier too for the season.

    An unwritten rule is not a rule. It would be silly to punish someone for that. If they want to prevent it, then make it a rule and enforce it.
  • GerbilGerbil Member Posts: 50 ★
    Hmm... Maybe my ally can capitalize by tanking IN-season & racking up off-season mwaauhahaha.... Wait...
  • GerbilGerbil Member Posts: 50 ★
    This would totally explain why we were getting crushed last season tho... I mean... There's no way my alliance just actually sucks.... Right?
  • HulksmasshhHulksmasshh Member Posts: 742 ★★★
    Off-season gonna off-season. That said, it is a bit surpising to see such ‘unspirited competition’ from thou holiest of holy alliances 😂
  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,336 ★★★★★
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    What happen when both alliances have empty maps and both finish 100%? Is that a tie? Lol

    Yes it is and a loss for both

    Sounds like a means to collusion. Tank at the same time . Lol

    You cant coordinate it though. You just have to hope they others do it.

    Tanking isnt against the rules as it's not in the ToS. Is it generally viewed as a negative. Yes but not illegal.

    Which I do agree if you see my other responses in a similar thread, but I never considered a double tank situation like this one until now. Going into attack phase with empty maps actually allow the alliances to collude during the attack phase (by getting a tie) arguably that will be illegal.

    Going into attack phase with empty maps on both sides, and both alliances “try their best” and 100% both maps with 0 deaths. How is this considered collusion? Lol
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • PaytoPlayPaytoPlay Member Posts: 762 ★★★
    xNig wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    Demonzfyre wrote: »
    PaytoPlay wrote: »
    What happen when both alliances have empty maps and both finish 100%? Is that a tie? Lol

    Yes it is and a loss for both

    Sounds like a means to collusion. Tank at the same time . Lol

    You cant coordinate it though. You just have to hope they others do it.

    Tanking isnt against the rules as it's not in the ToS. Is it generally viewed as a negative. Yes but not illegal.

    Which I do agree if you see my other responses in a similar thread, but I never considered a double tank situation like this one until now. Going into attack phase with empty maps actually allow the alliances to collude during the attack phase (by getting a tie) arguably that will be illegal.

    Going into attack phase with empty maps on both sides, and both alliances “try their best” and 100% both maps with 0 deaths. How is this considered collusion? Lol

    That's assuming both will actually 100% both map. If only 1 alliance 100% (or higher % than the other alliance) the map or if someone moved even one tile the other team tanks. Just saying there's potential.
  • Kabam PorthosKabam Porthos Moderator Posts: 4,676
    Hey guys, there are already a few active discussions about this topic, one of them is located HERE. If you wish to discuss this topic further, please do so by contributing to that thread. To help keep the Forum tidy, I'll go ahead and close this one.
This discussion has been closed.