Labyrinth Completion awards

@Kabam Miike

I'm curious. Will you be going through the list of the first 300 players that completed Labyrinth of Legends 100% and received the Legend Tag/Kang reward, and subtracting them from the allotted 300 awards.

Then going through the players who just finished after the cap was reached and determine who the rightful recipients should be?

Thanks

Comments

Primmer79

LoL rewards were already highly vetted and investigated for those finishers

LocoMotives

What @Primmer79 said. The first 300 were being checked as they happened, that's why the Legend tag and Kang were not immediate rewards upon exploration.

Idontinkso

I don't understand why manual checking is even necessary for the bulk of it. There should a roster crosscheck whenever you log in that runs an algorithm to determine who likely cheaters are. Pretty simple math for a lot of it...just some qualifying IF statements such as.. if playerX_ rating<100K and playerX_ roster contains (duped not trash hero) then flag for review. IF playerX_level <40 and playerX_ roster contains 5* ultron then deny login and flag for ban, etc...the game is too big to do a manual check for everything, it needs to be more efficient.

MCOC makes enough revenue to afford a few more programmers to put some cross checks in place and to have trained staff who can mitigate DDOS and high utilization issues as well.

As players there are terms of service. As a service provider Kabam has a responsibility to provide that service free of defects and as advertised. If you do the minimum and state that service is 'as is' and neglect to spend enough time or resources to make sure your contests are fair, you will continue to lose even more paying customers as faith in your service declines.

The arenas are never up and playable for time period it states, there are service interruptions pretty much every time. The Arena contests obviously haven't been administered fairly for some time now as it's filled with cheaters and the cutoff inflation is out of control due to a failed strategy to make them more fair.

It is going to take some definitive action other than just a reactionary cheater ban to gain my faith in the arenas back enough for me to go past the milestones

Thawnim

Idontinkso wrote: »

I don't understand why manual checking is even necessary for the bulk of it. There should a roster crosscheck whenever you log in that runs an algorithm to determine who likely cheaters are. Pretty simple math for a lot of it...just some qualifying IF statements such as.. if playerX_ rating<100K and playerX_ roster contains (duped not trash hero) then flag for review. IF playerX_level <40 and playerX_ roster contains 5* ultron then deny login and flag for ban, etc...the game is too big to do a manual check for everything, it needs to be more efficient.

MCOC makes enough revenue to afford a few more programmers to put some cross checks in place and to have trained staff who can mitigate DDOS and high utilization issues as well.

As players there are terms of service. As a service provider Kabam has a responsibility to provide that service free of defects and as advertised. If you do the minimum and state that service is 'as is' and neglect to spend enough time or resources to make sure your contests are fair, you will continue to lose even more paying customers as faith in your service declines.

The arenas are never up and playable for time period it states, there are service interruptions pretty much every time. The Arena contests obviously haven't been administered fairly for some time now as it's filled with cheaters and the cutoff inflation is out of control due to a failed strategy to make them more fair.

It is going to take some definitive action other than just a reactionary cheater ban to gain my faith in the arenas back enough for me to go past the milestones

I agree there are programs and checks that can run automatically for things like labyrinth, RoL, Act 5, special events and special challenges. But if something is flagged then there still would need to be a manual review of all the data at that point. It's just like in Excel when you get a weird number so you start digging in to find what is driving it. Sometimes it takes 5 minutes, sometimes it takes longer.

ThrawnsClone

@Kabam Miike @Primmer79

I understand the vetted the LoL run that was made. And one muse assume that because Kabam forewarned they would be scrutinizing the completion heavily...

That does not mean that the people who are part of the first 300 could not have cheated to obtain the champs or rank up items needed to make the run.

The game is 2.5 years old. If someone on the first 300 list has been banned as part of this ban wave, I find it hard to believe the took up cheating "recently"