Did you see a void nerf for you personally

Prof hoffs new video has a interesting topic in that people have seen the stats of voids sig reduced i havent checked my void and other people seem to not have this my question is did you

Comments

unknown

This content has been removed.

CoatHang3r

#StahpProf

Crazyjack719

Dont listen to his propaganda. Void is the same as he always has been.

Sabrefencer

RandomizerRuns_4 wrote: »

Prof Hoff is an idiot Lol. He is stupidly gullible & will literally believe ANYTHING he sees on the internet.

He's had to make NUMEROUS retractions on videos because he's been so wrong.

unknown

This content has been removed.

unknown

This content has been removed.

Demonzfyre

He is comparing a noded up void from an EQ when void was released. He was ramped up too much during the EQ and they reduced the stats. Void hasn't been nerfed, touched, tweaked or anything else. Prof Hof needs to stick to "reviewing" offers instead of champion reviews and information. He's not reliable for anything at all. Do some simple forum research and you will see for yourself. Stop feeding the tinfoil hat people.

Nemsa_M4n

I have a sig 200 5*R5 void. Sometimes when fear of the void is active the debuffs still take 10 seconds to apply rather than the 60% faster stated in his sig ability

phil56201

I commented on his video yesterday about the whole EQ stat increase and today had a notification that someone had replied to my comment. Went to check it out, and the video is gone.

Demonzfyre

phil56201 wrote: »

I commented on his video yesterday about the whole EQ stat increase and today had a notification that someone had replied to my comment. Went to check it out, and the video is gone.

I couldn't find it either.

DrAwkwardPhD

He took it down. Because he was wrong again. Like he was with the SymSupreme “nerf”. And about 2 dozen other rants that he has posted and then retracted. Don’t look to Prof Hoff for information pertaining to gameplay. He doesn’t seem to have much of a clue, and follows unsubstantiated trends.

MaximumOverload

Can any of the people who said yes send a screenshot of what most people say is fake just out of curiosity?

phil56201

Its not fake. They are screenshots from the UC EQ he was boss in. Check the void nerfed twice thread.

Eb0ny-O-M4w

You can just compare his spotlight (which wasn't changed since his introduction) with any Void in the game. You will get better results if the Void has max sig ability

Demonzfyre

phil56201 wrote: »

Its not fake. They are screenshots from the UC EQ he was boss in. Check the void nerfed twice thread.

@phil56201 the EQ VOID was changed because of unintended damage output was too high.

gohard123

Nemsa_M4n wrote: »

I have a sig 200 5*R5 void. Sometimes when fear of the void is active the debuffs still take 10 seconds to apply rather than the 60% faster stated in his sig ability

you missed the part in his passive abilities section that says +4 seconds if one intimidating presence debuff is already active.

Hammerbro_64

Demonzfyre wrote: »

phil56201 wrote: »

Its not fake. They are screenshots from the UC EQ he was boss in. Check the void nerfed twice thread.

@phil56201 the EQ VOID was changed because of unintended damage output was too high.

*definitely intended damage output was too high to screw with the players and boost sales.

Typos happen all the time 😉

phil56201

Demonzfyre wrote: »

phil56201 wrote: »

Its not fake. They are screenshots from the UC EQ he was boss in. Check the void nerfed twice thread.

@phil56201 the EQ VOID was changed because of unintended damage output was too high.

I know. Hence why there are 2 different screen shots of different damage outputs, both higher than what the actual playable Void was ever intended to have.

Demonzfyre

Hammerbro_64 wrote: »

Demonzfyre wrote: »

phil56201 wrote: »

Its not fake. They are screenshots from the UC EQ he was boss in. Check the void nerfed twice thread.

@phil56201 the EQ VOID was changed because of unintended damage output was too high.

*definitely intended damage output was too high to screw with the players and boost sales.

Typos happen all the time 😉

My bad my bad @Hammerbro_64 lol

Demonzfyre

phil56201 wrote: »

Demonzfyre wrote: »

phil56201 wrote: »

Its not fake. They are screenshots from the UC EQ he was boss in. Check the void nerfed twice thread.

@phil56201 the EQ VOID was changed because of unintended damage output was too high.

I know. Hence why there are 2 different screen shots of different damage outputs, both higher than what the actual playable Void was ever intended to have.

You arent understanding apparently. New champs in EQ are always super beefed up. They beefed up void too much, the f
7k screenshot, so they backed him down to 4k, 2nd screenshot. The 2k is a normal 5* void and where he should be/always was. Void was never nerfed for the player owned ones, just the EQ version.

Kabam Lyra

Going to close this down as it seems the discussion was based upon a misunderstanding and is not constructive.