Summoners, due to a technical issue, this week's series of Alliance Quests will be cancelled at 4pm PT. There will not be any Rewards for this series. The next series of Alliance Quests will start on April 18 at 12pm PT. We will be assessing the impact on Alliances and compensating accordingly, as well as returning Alliance Tickets.

Take 3*s out of Cavalier Crystals

Why in God's name are 3*s in the Cavalier Crystal? I understand that whales can take advantage of duping 4*s for 5* shards, but good grief. 4*s are no longer relevant with the release of act 6 and yet you still want us to buy a bunch of 3*s?

Just another reason why 4* restrictions are demoralizing.... Kabam has quite a few wrinkles to iron out...
«13

Comments

  • xNigxNig Posts: 5,635 ★★★★★
    Haha. This means, on average, you'll get at least a 4* from spending 400 units. Better than the FGMCs now lol
  • ClydaniaClydania Posts: 441 ★★
    edited March 2019
    You only have a 50% chance for them. Which is quite good if you'r elooking for a balance between a good crystals and not extendng the whale ftp gap too much
  • LormifLormif Posts: 7,346 ★★★★★
    xNig said:

    Haha. This means, on average, you'll get at least a 4* from spending 400 units. Better than the FGMCs now lol

    On average means over 1000 crystal openings or more.
  • xNigxNig Posts: 5,635 ★★★★★
    Lormif said:

    xNig said:

    Haha. This means, on average, you'll get at least a 4* from spending 400 units. Better than the FGMCs now lol

    On average means over 1000 crystal openings or more.
    Yeah. Lol
  • IsItthoughIsItthough Posts: 254 ★★
    Ben93 said:

    If you want a crystal with no 3*, then the price should be 1000 units at least... It is exactly the same price as GMC with 6* in it, 11% 5* and 38% 4* and you are complaining ? OMG... This is ONLY 200 units and you will get one of these crystals each week instead of 2 weeks for GMC.

    What is the next step ? 6* crystal for 50 units ?

    And I currently enjoy the 3* I get every two weeks, so I'm sure the additional 55 4* shards will come in hand each week.
  • RektorRektor Posts: 673 ★★★
    So you need to clear act 6 chapter 1 to get a crystal with an 88% chance that you will get a champ that you can’t use in act 6.

    Cool story bro
  • SyndicatedSyndicated Posts: 132
    for 200 units, will be a lost from Kabam side if they place only 4-5-6*, they must place a lost for the players, is common sense my friend.
  • IKONIKON Posts: 844 ★★★★
    If they remove 3*, the cost would be 400 units per. Think of it as free 4* shards instead.
  • IKONIKON Posts: 844 ★★★★
    V1PER1987 said:

    IKON said:

    If they remove 3*, the cost would be 400 units per. Think of it as free 4* shards instead.

    Free 4* shards that cost 200 units.
    As per my previous post, the crystal would likely cost 400 units if you remove 3*. 2x 200 would give on average, a 3*, and a 4*, 5*, or 6*.

    So yes, free 4* shards.
  • Wakandas_FinestWakandas_Finest Posts: 590 ★★★
    edited March 2019
    IKON said:

    V1PER1987 said:

    IKON said:

    If they remove 3*, the cost would be 400 units per. Think of it as free 4* shards instead.

    Free 4* shards that cost 200 units.
    As per my previous post, the crystal would likely cost 400 units if you remove 3*. 2x 200 would give on average, a 3*, and a 4*, 5*, or 6*.

    So yes, free 4* shards.
    So removing 3* is going to makes the crystal more expensive when adding 6* didn't? Not sure I follow your logic. Kabam should have made the cavalier crystal the similar to the grandmasters crystal but have 4-6 stars instead of 3-5 star champs. There really is no logical reason to include 3* in the cavalier crystal since anyone who completes act 6 most likely has no need for 3 star champs not even for 4* shards
  • StarhawkStarhawk Posts: 303 ★★
    IKON said:

    If they remove 3*, the cost would be 400 units per. Think of it as free 4* shards instead.

    It is hard to think of it as free 4* shards when you are speculating the cost if 3* were not included. I might as well speculate the cost would be 50 units if 2* were included.
  • ẞlооdẞlооd Posts: 1,937 ★★★★
    edited March 2019
    I'd be cool if they left that, but upgraded the bi-weekly GMC to drop 4* or higher. (After they achieved cavalier status of course).
  • BigPoppaCBONEBigPoppaCBONE Posts: 1,423 ★★★★

    for 200 units, will be a lost from Kabam side if they place only 4-5-6*, they must place a lost for the players, is common sense my friend.

    They aren't paying miners to get these crystals. How do you figure there's a loss in selling MORE of a digital item when they make the item more desirable to more people?
  • 57R34K_the_MERC57R34K_the_MERC Posts: 22
    I decided to give the cavalier crystals a shot. Bought 12 of them.. 9 3*s and 3 4*s...

    This is the first and last time I purchase a crystal with units on this account.
  • LormifLormif Posts: 7,346 ★★★★★

    I decided to give the cavalier crystals a shot. Bought 12 of them.. 9 3*s and 3 4*s...

    This is the first and last time I purchase a crystal with units on this account.

    I bought some as well, about 200 worth and got 6 5*s, your poor luck does not mean they are bad.
  • LormifLormif Posts: 7,346 ★★★★★

    for 200 units, will be a lost from Kabam side if they place only 4-5-6*, they must place a lost for the players, is common sense my friend.

    They aren't paying miners to get these crystals. How do you figure there's a loss in selling MORE of a digital item when they make the item more desirable to more people?
    because it makes it harder to sell other packages, meaning they make less money.
  • LurkerLurker Posts: 196
    Lormif said:

    I decided to give the cavalier crystals a shot. Bought 12 of them.. 9 3*s and 3 4*s...

    This is the first and last time I purchase a crystal with units on this account.

    I bought some as well, about 200 worth and got 6 5*s, your poor luck does not mean they are bad.
    @Lormif

    I'm not sure I am reading this right. you bought approximately 200 crystals? roughly 40,000 units? and got 6 5*?

    statistically you should've gotten 2 6* and 22 5* but claim you had reasonable luck getting 6 5*?

    I feel like there are some words missing from your post or you meant that you bought 20 instead of 200...
Sign In or Register to comment.