Yeah and it could lead to its own What IF animated episode on Disney+ In a manner of speaking, Earth-616 is a What If? version of the MCU and this sort of already happened. Also the MCU Earth is Earth 616 Earth-616 is the designation of the main Marvel universe from the comics. The MCU is canonically an alternate reality. I assume you are referencing the scene from Far From Home, but a) that is a potentially very unreliable narrator, and b) the Living Tribunal doesn't assign unique ID numbers in the sky, so it is entirely possible that the MCU is referred to as "Earth-616" by Beck because that really is what the MCU is designated as on his own Earth (if he really is from another dimension).But to us humans here on Earth-1218, Earth-616 normally refers to the main Marvel comic continuity. What they said I don't know if you're unaware of the entire history of the Marvel universe, or you just don't care, but I also don't think it is worth figuring out either. I know a lot, you’re the one making assumptions
Yeah and it could lead to its own What IF animated episode on Disney+ In a manner of speaking, Earth-616 is a What If? version of the MCU and this sort of already happened. Also the MCU Earth is Earth 616 Earth-616 is the designation of the main Marvel universe from the comics. The MCU is canonically an alternate reality. I assume you are referencing the scene from Far From Home, but a) that is a potentially very unreliable narrator, and b) the Living Tribunal doesn't assign unique ID numbers in the sky, so it is entirely possible that the MCU is referred to as "Earth-616" by Beck because that really is what the MCU is designated as on his own Earth (if he really is from another dimension).But to us humans here on Earth-1218, Earth-616 normally refers to the main Marvel comic continuity. What they said I don't know if you're unaware of the entire history of the Marvel universe, or you just don't care, but I also don't think it is worth figuring out either.
Yeah and it could lead to its own What IF animated episode on Disney+ In a manner of speaking, Earth-616 is a What If? version of the MCU and this sort of already happened. Also the MCU Earth is Earth 616 Earth-616 is the designation of the main Marvel universe from the comics. The MCU is canonically an alternate reality. I assume you are referencing the scene from Far From Home, but a) that is a potentially very unreliable narrator, and b) the Living Tribunal doesn't assign unique ID numbers in the sky, so it is entirely possible that the MCU is referred to as "Earth-616" by Beck because that really is what the MCU is designated as on his own Earth (if he really is from another dimension).But to us humans here on Earth-1218, Earth-616 normally refers to the main Marvel comic continuity. What they said
Yeah and it could lead to its own What IF animated episode on Disney+ In a manner of speaking, Earth-616 is a What If? version of the MCU and this sort of already happened. Also the MCU Earth is Earth 616 Earth-616 is the designation of the main Marvel universe from the comics. The MCU is canonically an alternate reality. I assume you are referencing the scene from Far From Home, but a) that is a potentially very unreliable narrator, and b) the Living Tribunal doesn't assign unique ID numbers in the sky, so it is entirely possible that the MCU is referred to as "Earth-616" by Beck because that really is what the MCU is designated as on his own Earth (if he really is from another dimension).But to us humans here on Earth-1218, Earth-616 normally refers to the main Marvel comic continuity.
Yeah and it could lead to its own What IF animated episode on Disney+ In a manner of speaking, Earth-616 is a What If? version of the MCU and this sort of already happened. Also the MCU Earth is Earth 616
Yeah and it could lead to its own What IF animated episode on Disney+ In a manner of speaking, Earth-616 is a What If? version of the MCU and this sort of already happened.
Yeah and it could lead to its own What IF animated episode on Disney+
Finally made time in my schedule to see it just now....it was mediocre. They did a lot of dumb things with a number of characters (obviously, IMO). To be honest, all Marvel movies are pretty mediocre when I take away my huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge love for Marvel bias. I love the characters from the comics. The MCU is trash (again, IMO) and poorly represents many of those characters. Hulk is by far my favorite character of any comic...I just want to see 1 movie (from the MCU) do him justice That said, I still enjoy the movies because I finally get to see the heroes from my childhood
Lol I love this. I think the most accurate name for that scene would be pandering.1) Carol don’t need your help. (Obviously)2) I mean, what are the chances that not a single boy looks up and says, “hey, I’m gonna help too!l lol3) They could’ve gotten backlash for killing off a female character when there are somewhat less already had they not shot this scene to distract from that. tbh what bothered me more was cap giving the shield to falcon instead of his best friend and emotional motive for superhero-ing mostly (civil war). Reason? One’s black, one’s white. There are canon reason’s to be argued, but to me Bucky makes more senseI know Sam becomes cap in the comics and whatnot, but idk it just sorta made me sad that Bucky will be in the sidekick spot for the rest of Stan’s 9-picture deal.
I think the overall movie was done well. But I do think that time travel in general is lazy writing. It is a cop out tactic when you write yourself into a corner and can't seem to get out of it. Time travel is stupid and makes zero sense.
Calling it now. Kang is the new big bad That's one possibility. Here's another one. Endgame creates the multiverse. In one of those timelines a scientist determines that his timeline is only a branching timeline from a main cosmic universe and tries to figure out a way to escape his universe before it collapses. He builds a special craft to survive the collapse and emerges into the main MCU universe, only the journey transforms him into a celestial being like Ego. Only this one is very, very hungry.
Calling it now. Kang is the new big bad
Pushing the Feminism? Do you mean the power scene at the end? That was bad-ass. The only reason why it happened was the hard left Brie Larson. Who isn’t even a good actress
Pushing the Feminism? Do you mean the power scene at the end? That was bad-ass.
Lol I love this. I think the most accurate name for that scene would be pandering.1) Carol don’t need your help. (Obviously)2) I mean, what are the chances that not a single boy looks up and says, “hey, I’m gonna help too!l lol3) They could’ve gotten backlash for killing off a female character when there are somewhat less already had they not shot this scene to distract from that. tbh what bothered me more was cap giving the shield to falcon instead of his best friend and emotional motive for superhero-ing mostly (civil war). Reason? One’s black, one’s white. There are canon reason’s to be argued, but to me Bucky makes more senseI know Sam becomes cap in the comics and whatnot, but idk it just sorta made me sad that Bucky will be in the sidekick spot for the rest of Stan’s 9-picture deal. Yeah, it was pandering but so was captain America saying avengers assemble when a vast majority of heroes there weren't Avengers nor could they have heard him in that huge crowd. The entire film is filled with fanservice, while it felt forced I don't really understand why people are so averse to the scene. Cap giving the shield to sam makes more sense to me than Bucky. The shield and mantle is a symbol, bucky even though he is his best friend is a recognized terrorist and is facing a whole host of psychological issues due to his slavery to hydra. Sam is a veteran with no adverse history in the public eye and has been by cap's side since WS. As a symbol to America of hope the shield fits with sam far better.
trash
You're taking one Scene that grouped all the strong Women together and making it some kind of Political Statement. Are we really still this Misogynistic in 2019? Making a movie made to entertain about politics is a problem to meI don’t care what people do but once you shove it my face that’s when I don’t like itAnd don’t say they were grouping the strong women. They purposely made peter look weak and helpless so the Strong and Amazing Women could save the Weak and Lame BoyI’m not against Women at allAll I’m saying is That scene could have been done a lot better and more subtleLastly Why are you jumping directly to misogynism I just don’t want politics in my movies and you said Misogynist Wow Great criticism Your view IS misogynistic. Your issue is with having a Scene with strong Women, and you're calling it a Political "in your face" Statement. You even went so far as to say that Black Panther was about him and not her. Your issue is you think Men should dominate. That is misogynistic. I guess that’s ur opinion Some white knight beta males thirst can’t ever be quenched can they?Argument over Don’t really care anymore
You're taking one Scene that grouped all the strong Women together and making it some kind of Political Statement. Are we really still this Misogynistic in 2019? Making a movie made to entertain about politics is a problem to meI don’t care what people do but once you shove it my face that’s when I don’t like itAnd don’t say they were grouping the strong women. They purposely made peter look weak and helpless so the Strong and Amazing Women could save the Weak and Lame BoyI’m not against Women at allAll I’m saying is That scene could have been done a lot better and more subtleLastly Why are you jumping directly to misogynism I just don’t want politics in my movies and you said Misogynist Wow Great criticism Your view IS misogynistic. Your issue is with having a Scene with strong Women, and you're calling it a Political "in your face" Statement. You even went so far as to say that Black Panther was about him and not her. Your issue is you think Men should dominate. That is misogynistic.
You're taking one Scene that grouped all the strong Women together and making it some kind of Political Statement. Are we really still this Misogynistic in 2019? Making a movie made to entertain about politics is a problem to meI don’t care what people do but once you shove it my face that’s when I don’t like itAnd don’t say they were grouping the strong women. They purposely made peter look weak and helpless so the Strong and Amazing Women could save the Weak and Lame BoyI’m not against Women at allAll I’m saying is That scene could have been done a lot better and more subtleLastly Why are you jumping directly to misogynism I just don’t want politics in my movies and you said Misogynist Wow Great criticism
You're taking one Scene that grouped all the strong Women together and making it some kind of Political Statement. Are we really still this Misogynistic in 2019?
I think the overall movie was done well. But I do think that time travel in general is lazy writing. It is a cop out tactic when you write yourself into a corner and can't seem to get out of it. Time travel is stupid and makes zero sense. they made it make sense if you listened although i did feel that way going into it, but they didnt really have any other options lol
Lol I love this. I think the most accurate name for that scene would be pandering.1) Carol don’t need your help. (Obviously)2) I mean, what are the chances that not a single boy looks up and says, “hey, I’m gonna help too!l lol3) They could’ve gotten backlash for killing off a female character when there are somewhat less already had they not shot this scene to distract from that. tbh what bothered me more was cap giving the shield to falcon instead of his best friend and emotional motive for superhero-ing mostly (civil war). Reason? One’s black, one’s white. There are canon reason’s to be argued, but to me Bucky makes more senseI know Sam becomes cap in the comics and whatnot, but idk it just sorta made me sad that Bucky will be in the sidekick spot for the rest of Stan’s 9-picture deal. Yeah, it was pandering but so was captain America saying avengers assemble when a vast majority of heroes there weren't Avengers nor could they have heard him in that huge crowd. The entire film is filled with fanservice, while it felt forced I don't really understand why people are so averse to the scene. Cap giving the shield to sam makes more sense to me than Bucky. The shield and mantle is a symbol, bucky even though he is his best friend is a recognized terrorist and is facing a whole host of psychological issues due to his slavery to hydra. Sam is a veteran with no adverse history in the public eye and has been by cap's side since WS. As a symbol to America of hope the shield fits with sam far better. But Shuri fixed the mind control issue during bucky’s stay in wakanda, one of the “broken white boys” she had to fix. And caps whole arc is that he is straying from the straight laced Patriot he once was. Bucky makes more sense in almost all respects.