**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Worknprogress ★★★★★
Kommentare
-
Defenders will no longer be locked out of solo content
-
I'd be insanely embarrassed to get caught doing something so pathetic and so much worse coming out and admitting it. Yikes.
-
Unless you couldn't. Wind up against someone that's nullify immune with class advantage and you're screwed. You can play around unblockable with literally anyone by just not blocking. If you're someone that relies on needing an ideal counter for fights then yeah you probably liked last week better bc there were more ideal…
-
It's far easier to play around unblockable with anyone than unstoppable 🤷
-
I like it better than last week so far personally
-
Disintegration isn't non damaging though is it?
-
Not finding AW enjoyable is totally understandable but not sure how one could find it boring. It's basically the last area of the game, besides now BGs, that you actually have to put any thought into.
-
Finishing VT in battlegrounds gets the most
-
It's so much more confusing for new players seeing a rotation done with a champ, trying it themselves and not realizing why it doesn't work bc there was a rank difference between what they watched and what they have.
-
Why? I much prefer it the way its being done. Then when you get 7*s, champs that have hit count specific rotations still work out of the box at R1. I can't think of a single reason why anyone would want to continue with the status quo
-
This is one of the few examples you'll see posted of actual bad matchmaking
-
I didn't say anything about 5-25%. As far as I understand 7*s will have the current R5 (4-6*) CPR from R1 - R6 which is why when they were introduced in the previous month's SQ people thought there was some additional power gain happening. I've not heard anything about lower rarity combat power rates being changed but just…
-
It's not. The adrenaline type ability has yet to be disclosed. The CPR was a design choice for balancing champ rotations going forward. Also with 7*s having an additional rank, a R6 would theoretically have an even higher CPR so as far as I know it was decided to just eliminate the CPR change with ranks to streamline things
-
Did you rank or add sigs to Herc in between rooms? Crossfights have been bugged since they've existed just about. Plenty of old posts about people randomly losing Horseman mid quest. A lot of times it was after ranking or adding sigs to said champ, sometimes after force quitting a fight to get a restart, but others just…
-
Maw does the same as well.
-
Until 7*s. They have the same CPR (the max of other rarities Iirc) through all ranks
-
He was made to have a high skill cap very much intentionally. That's one of the things that actually makes him balanced unlike someone like Herc that has multiple cheats built into his kit so that even the worst players can look like they know what they're doing with him.
-
Unfazed mastery
-
Surfer is far from a prestige only champ as well. He's been a staple as a BG attacker for many top level players across multiple metas.
-
It's pretty random. This morning I've had fights with just the unstoppable nodes working and no health modifier and others where both the health and unstoppable nodes work fine.
-
I don't think they would have the stronger position personally. Just bc someone does something for a living doesn't mean they're particularly good at it. Now I'm certainly not saying I'm definitively right here as I obviously don't know, but I've dealt with enough completely clueless individuals in my own profession to…
-
The unstoppable buff will still proc but won't actually do anything as long as slow is up
-
I'm not saying start people the following season in the GC but I don't see the harm in starting the people that finish VT in a week or two at the bottom of Platinum and giving those rewards personally. People playing enough to finish VT that quickly aren't just going to stop playing as those are your most competitive…
-
They did earn them in this situation though. They were earned by completing the previous season's VT faster than everyone else. For people finishing VT in the first week or even two weeks, it's just a formality. It's a question of when they'll finish based on how much they want to play as opposed to whether they'll string…
-
He's definitely not immune to poison and his fury is passive so no it doesn't work
-
I'm not sure why "giving" the previous milestone rewards from a staggered start is considered such a taboo thing personally. This is also why I'd rather the stagger be based on how quickly one completes VT or their ending point within VT from the previous season as opposed to staggering just based on title though. I see…
-
I don't like the current system at all personally. I also am not sure what the better system actually is as long as everyone is in the same reward pool. If you make matchmaking truly random (my personal preference as long as everyone is in the same pool) then players lower in the progression ladder are obviously going to…
-
I think one of the biggest issues is player expectations personally. I don't understand why people that are lower in the progression ladder or higher up but not particularly good at the game feel entitled to finish VT at all. A lot of that has to do with Kabam I'm sure in that they've gone out of their way to hide the fact…
-
Farming event points 🤷
-
So the answer in punishing those that aren't struggling and making them play more to finish VT?