**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Description in Sabertooth's ability
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I am still waiting for the answers to my question, but ill give you more, what is between your ears? is it your ears or is it a brain? If you sit between Paul and Mike, are you sitting on them?
The first sentence was not evidence. It was your opinion of what the sentence means, not what it actually means. That's not bias, but observation. Got more? Show me a source that supports your argument. Without sources your evidence will remain in the realm of opinion. But ad hom to you too.
Additionally, by asking for the cliffnotes you revealed more to your detriment than to your advantage.
1) “Interesting, instead of offering any evidence you resort to powerful and denigrating language.”
The first statement is evidence showing how people are using defintions that exclusively fit thier beliefs at the exclusion of other possibilities, sort of like a false dichotomy.
2)”Now you are just trolling. The evidence is given to you. You don't deliver any objective evidence, but refuse to admit you were wrong (which is not a weakness...). We can't debate like this, good day sir.”
Fallatic argumentation from the ad hom at the start.
Evidence presented from 3rd party sources and dismissed by you does not mean it didn’t happen.
You obviously can debate like this as you are continuing to.
Im not back tracking anymore at this time.
Anyways back to playing. Good luck.