**UPDATES TO ENLISTMENT GIFTING EVENT:**
To prevent exploitation, we will prevent new Accounts from being able to Gift enlistment crystals. We will also be taking action on those who are using 3rd Party Sellers, Bots and other farms to gift themselves mass amounts of Enlistment Crystals. Lastly, we will be adding an expiration timer to Enlistment Crystals. All unopened Enlistment Crystals will expire on Oct 18 @ 17:00 UTC. For more information, please see this post: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/346104/updates-to-enlistment-gifting-event
To prevent exploitation, we will prevent new Accounts from being able to Gift enlistment crystals. We will also be taking action on those who are using 3rd Party Sellers, Bots and other farms to gift themselves mass amounts of Enlistment Crystals. Lastly, we will be adding an expiration timer to Enlistment Crystals. All unopened Enlistment Crystals will expire on Oct 18 @ 17:00 UTC. For more information, please see this post: https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/346104/updates-to-enlistment-gifting-event
Comments
Among the small number that use him, they use him effectively. Meaning the cross-section that uses him, uses him well. That's the point I was making about a variety of demographics. The Crystal is not aimed at the Top Players, or any specific demographic, really. It's a mixture of all, at least from what I've gathered. It's been explained that the point was not to fill it with the "best", but to avoid the worst performing. There are different levels of Players, and different demographics. A fair cross-section looks at a variety, not just the top.
That's a stretch. I said they look at more demographics than the top, and their effort is to try and exclude the poor performing ones based on their findings. The definition of the worst can vary from Player bracket to Player bracket. The data doesn't have an opinion.
You can look at figures as much as you like, but in the real world the majority of those champs offer little utility and what little utility they offer is outshined by many other champs in the game.
Most are not effective tools, and not even close to being VERY EFFECTIVE tools.
Let me re-quote it.
"I didn't say most used, but they are among the most effective."
Most of them are definitely NOT among "the most effective". Not even close. His wording is clearly comparing them to other similar tools in the MCOC toolbox (regen, power control, ability accuracy reduction etc...) and most of these champs get significantly outperformed by better performing tools. So they are not among the most effective.
Seriously wise of you to ask players who actually play,so you would have real effective options.The only Effective one in AQ or AW Doc Oc. I bet you probably tested these champs and rated it for complicated abiliteies. In fact i think you probably copied a tier list from a big youtuber and decided to permanently leave out omni or god tier champs. My point is it was good thinking to ask actual players unlike employees.
What??? Your living in the past dude.Out of those 18 Beast and Venompool are decent. But cyclops!!!???
I agree and want to see something.You will not potentially need to change a little.YOU MUST CHANGE A LOT!!!!
"There is a smaller group of players that use him......"
That's the part you're missing. They're not trying to put the most effective in the Crystal, and they never indicated as much. They're trying not to add the ones that perform the poorest based on their data.
That list you have compiled is your own checklist. There is no indication that those are the areas they are looking at. Which is why they're relying on their own data and not popular opinion. No one demographic is determining what goes into the Crystal. You may personally believe that effectiveness is determined by the top, but that's not what the data collected over all parts of the game and levels of Players necessarily reflects. That's the most effective FOR YOU. There's a difference.
Most is moot because the process is not about including the most effective. It's about avoiding the least.
Good luck with that !
No. That's not what I'm saying. That's a loophole.
“Cyclops scores very high on the list “ hahah .. “there is a smaller group of players use him”.....thanks for answering about cyclops by yourself ..
There’s a reason why only smaller number of people use cyclops
Yassss I will beat collector with Antman and cyclops
There's a difference between using them effectively and preference.
Antman will repeat
They look at all the data. Not just the top Players. Yes, what you're saying is true, but it has nothing to do with what I said. Technically, I'm sure they could find people who use all Champs "effectively" at different points. That's not the point I'm making.
I said they look at all demographics. Meaning they don't just rely on the data from the Top Tier. You would find that the list of Champs used is very acute. They look at others as well. Most likely on an individual basis. Meaning they look at all Champs, and how they perform among those that use them.
Do I know this for fact? No. I do not have access to their data. Can I see this from various comments and the results in the Crystal? Absolutely.
They're not trying to find the most effective. They're trying to not include the ones that performed the worst, and I suspect those results are the ones they're working on buffing, at least starting with Luke and Rulk.
What you're saying is not what I'm saying. I didn't say they can include any Champ because they can find people who use any Champ effectively. That's contrary to what they have said themselves. Clearly they're looking for the ones not doing so well, and that is among the Players that use them.