**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
An alternative to rank-down tickets
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
In a single player game, no. In a multiplayer game, yes. In a multiplayer game, you forfeit the right to say no one else should care about what you want and what you get at the door. That's basically rule zero about MMOs. At some point, everyone thinks it. You're not alone. But no MMO indulges that idea.
Yep, because he is not asking for RDT He is trying to come up with a compromise for those that just did things like grind and spend a lot of time of resources on champs like Dormammu for the sole purpose of using them in AW defense.
Those that have the smaller rosters are the ones hurt the most by the change. I'm fortunate enough, and have played long enough, this has had no real impact on me but this is very discouraging to newer players.
When part of the argument for the change to AW and eliminating defender kills was to as @Kabam Miike, put it "make players not feel like they are helping the other alliance" then this suggestion makes a lot of sense because right now players ARE helping the other alliance by not having a lot unique champions and they have already spent their resources based on ranking for the old system which was just thrown out on them out of nowhere.
I had to edit this whole thing because I thought you quoted a different comment I made.
The OP did ask for RDT's. Just RDT's with a minor change
Smaller rosters weren't hit as hard as those with much larger rosters who used way more resources for r5 4*s and r4 5*s. I don't understand that argument.
Your third argument I have no clue what you were getting at
Wrong.
So are only a certain number of players allowed to change their prestige with RDTs and the rest could not? Because that's what your argument sounds like.
The last line is wrong and is the whole reason for your selfish argument.
Selfish would be demanding RDT's given out for uses they were never intended for.
No. What he meant was some would be able to abuse them. Not that some are entitled to abuse them.
In the short term you're right. In the long term, these are just returning resources that you've earned and used on a champ, which can go to those same champs the other guy used them on. You are not forced to use the rank-down materials immediately.
Fear of someone having a better roster than you is a incredibly selfish reason to oppose something that would help that vast majority of players.
That is not even close to what he was saying.
who cares it would all balance out and with talk of 6* champs and the fact that we cant even r5 a 5* this doesnt matter in the grand scheme of things
Even I can tell you twisted his words there to fit your agenda. Argue or debate with validity. Don't make things up
RDTs are for when champs or the content is significantly changed. The changes to AW are well within the vague lines of RDTs.
Miike even said, "Champions that you think right now might be less useful than they were before, might just become your favorites again". That strongly implied that the value/usefulness of champions has changed.
Like I said, fear that RDTs will help someone more than you as your whole basis of opposing them is selfish.
No champs were changed. And when RDT's were introduced champs were nerfed and the entire fundamentals of the game were altered. Your comparing the entire game as a whole changing vs AW alone, and AW is still going through changes that none of us no where its gonna end.
As for what Miike said, Im well aware of this since I quote it often. It was not an unknown fact to us or Kabam that diversity was gonna remove who we might use as defenders so its not like he was covering tracks there to suggest mistakes were made on devaluing champs. There intentions were clear to give us a new strategy to remove some known defenders for diversity, as flawed as it was. Our feedback was heard and they made a change to diversity. No need for RDT's there
I think you're neglecting the fact that we all use them in the same manor