In other news...Loki twice as good as Blade

FallencircusFallencircus Member Posts: 339 ★★★
in General Discussion
Was the pricing of the latest Loki deal a mistake? I can’t imagine people wanting to spend $20 for a shot at Loki. Especially when Blade/Mourningstar was $9.99 and they hadn’t even been released yet. It might not be your intent but even offering a deal like this (of course you don’t have to buy it) makes it seems like you don’t care about consistency or the players.
Yes, the game has been successful but it could be much much more. Make the game fun to spend money on not content where people feel (subjective) the need to have to spend (ie The Collector)

Thank you.

Comments

  • LurkerLurker Member Posts: 196 ★
    I spent A LOT more money on this game pre-12.0 nerf, pre-Endlessly bugged mechanics, and pre-AW scoring fiasco. I now know you get very little for your money because they take back anything you buy so they can sell it to you again.
  • Viper1987Viper1987 Member Posts: 728 ★★★
    Might be an attempt to capitalize on the new synergies that were released involving Loki. It looks like he will possibly become a top tier champ with those synergies.
  • HugsForEveryoneHugsForEveryone Member Posts: 82 ★
    edited November 2017
    Fallencircus wrote: »
    Was the pricing of the latest Loki deal a mistake? I can’t imagine people wanting to spend $20 for a shot at Loki. Especially when Blade/Mourningstar was $9.99 and they hadn’t even been released yet. It might not be your intent but even offering a deal like this (of course you don’t have to buy it) makes it seems like you don’t care about consistency or the players.
    Yes, the game has been successful but it could be much much more. Make the game fun to spend money on not content where people feel (subjective) the need to have to spend (ie The Collector)

    Thank you.
    Loki will be better than blade with his new synergies at least it’s looking that way
  • Draco2199Draco2199 Member Posts: 803 ★★★
    HugsForEveryone wrote: »
    Fallencircus wrote: »
    Was the pricing of the latest Loki deal a mistake? I can’t imagine people wanting to spend $20 for a shot at Loki. Especially when Blade/Mourningstar was $9.99 and they hadn’t even been released yet. It might not be your intent but even offering a deal like this (of course you don’t have to buy it) makes it seems like you don’t care about consistency or the players.
    Yes, the game has been successful but it could be much much more. Make the game fun to spend money on not content where people feel (subjective) the need to have to spend (ie The Collector)

    Thank you.
    Loki will be better than blade with his new synergies at least it’s looking that way

    As a person that has an r4 5* Blade I would have to say theres no chance even with those synergies that Loki is better.
  • HugsForEveryoneHugsForEveryone Member Posts: 82 ★
    Draco2199 wrote: »
    HugsForEveryone wrote: »
    Fallencircus wrote: »
    Was the pricing of the latest Loki deal a mistake? I can’t imagine people wanting to spend $20 for a shot at Loki. Especially when Blade/Mourningstar was $9.99 and they hadn’t even been released yet. It might not be your intent but even offering a deal like this (of course you don’t have to buy it) makes it seems like you don’t care about consistency or the players.
    Yes, the game has been successful but it could be much much more. Make the game fun to spend money on not content where people feel (subjective) the need to have to spend (ie The Collector)

    Thank you.
    Loki will be better than blade with his new synergies at least it’s looking that way

    As a person that has an r4 5* Blade I would have to say theres no chance even with those synergies that Loki is better.
    5drda5bm0b6l.gif

Sign In or Register to comment.